From the beginning
of his movement Hitler sought to awaken Germany from what he viewed as
the communist threat. Sounding the alarm thundered through his speeches
and writings like a call to arms. He repeatedly portrayed himself
and his movement as the new messiah beckoning millions to salvation in
a manner presaging Bush decrying al Qaeda.
In his speech at the Industry
Club in Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932 he said:
Today
we stand at the turning-point of Germany's destiny. If the present
development continues, Germany will one day of necessity land in Bolshevist
chaos,...
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, page 824
Even
the elections for the Reichstag, with their outward swelling of the Marxist
votes, announced the more and more rapidly approaching internal, and, with
it, external, collapse.
MEIN KAMPF, Adolph
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 453
An electoral campaign
was opened by Hitler's speech in the Sportpalast in Berlin on 24 October
1933 when he said:
The
German people laid down its arms when there was a danger that all Europe
might possibly slide into Bolshevism. A military disaster may lead
to a national catastrophe, and a people may fall into chaos: it may then
be infected by bacilli which may spread to other countries. The danger
of infection has not grown less: it has only increased.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1111
From the outset Hitler
clearly demonstrated that he would spare no effort to expunge Marxism from
Germany, and using similar techniques Bush now declares he will remove
al Qaeda as a threat to the United States. In the Proclamation by
the Government to the German Nation on 1 February 1933 the Fuhrer stated:
Germany
must not, Germany shall not go under in the chaos of Communism.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 113
In Berlin on 1 May
1933:
We
intend by no means to eliminate Marxism only in an external sense.
We are resolved to remove its very foundations. We want to spare
coming generations the mental confusion it causes.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 314
...
other peoples will also defend themselves against the bolshevist and Jewish
chaos, for we must make our determination plain to the world. We
have already gained friends abroad because we have made clear our position
against bolshevism and world Jewry. We will tolerate no lackeys of
the Jews in our midst-- whether in the press, the economy, or the diplomatic
service.
SECRET CONVERSATIONS
WITH HITLER, Edited by Edouard Calic, 1971. Page 49
In his speech at the
Harvest Celebration on 3 October 1937:
The
international Jewish Bolshevist leaders must let me say: wherever they
may make their way, at the boundaries of Germany they will come up against
a wall of iron.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1365
In the Reichstag on
15 September 1935:
...
we are resolved to combat the Bolshevist revolutionary agitation in Germany
with the effective weapons of National Socialist enlightenment.
The Party Congress has certainly left no room for doubt that National Socialism--if
an attempt is made by Moscow-Bolshevism to establish a foothold in Germany
or to drive Germany into a revolution--will most definitely put a stop
to this plan and such attempts.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 705
On 24 August 1936:
If now a Bolshevist authority declares with cynical frankness that in certain
circumstances it will be the task of the Bolshevist army to impose from
without through the intervention of the Red Army revolution upon those
countries which would resist internal Bolshevist agitation, National Socialist
Germany in the face of such an announcement will capitulate just as little
as it capitulated before the threats of the Moscow-paid agitators in Germany
itself....
History has taught us that it is better, if necessary, to make great sacrifices
for external peace rather than to be overwhelmed in Bolshevist chaos.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1327
On 14 September 1936:
May,
however, that very Bolshevism of which we learned only a few months ago
that it intends to arm its forces in order to open the door to revolution
among other peoples with force, if necessary; may this Bolshevism know
that the new German Army stands guard at the German door.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 840
In Nuremberg on 7 September
1937:
There
is one comforting certainty the German nation can then call its own: even
if the world around us catches on fire, the National Socialist State will
rise forth from the Bolshevist flames like platinum.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 923
In a speech to the
Reichstag on 30 January 1937:
However,
in view of the unresolved political situation, I shall not fail to do anything
which might serve to guarantee to the German Volk its existence even after
other states have succumbed to the Bolshevist infection.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 867
For
if the result of German action with respect to the French Ruhr invasion
had been simply the annihilation of Marxism internally, success would thereby
already have been ours. A Germany liberated from this deadly enemy
of its existence and its future would have possessed a potency which not
even the whole world could any longer have strangled. On the day
when Marxism is smashed in Germany, its chains will really be broken forever.
MEIN KAMPF, Adolph
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 987
On 7 March 1936:
I
am a German, I love my Volk and I am attached to it. I know that
it can only be happy if allowed to live in accordance with its nature and
its way. The German Volk has been able not only to cry, but also
to laugh heartily all its life, and I do not want the horror of the Communist
international dictatorship of hatred to descend upon it.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 767
Hitler had no hesitation
about using force against the Marxists if he considered it necessary.
In a speech to the Reichstag on 30 January 1937 he stated:
Only
where the murderous lust of Bolshevism believed itself capable, even after
January 30, 1933, of preventing the triumph or the realization of the National
Socialist idea by force have we naturally countered with force--and have
done so with the speed of lightning.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 862
In Berlin on 8 October
1935:
We
are fighting with the Communists here, and we will beat them into the ground
if necessary.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 717
In a proclamation at
a party convention on 9 September 1936:
We are National Socialists. We have never been afraid of Bolshevism.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolf Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 396
On 14 September 1936:
No
one will harbor a single doubt that National Socialism will defend itself
everywhere and under any circumstances against the attacks of Bolshevism,
and will conquer and destroy it.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 840
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 260
Not only did Hitler
declare the purpose of Nazism was to save Germany from Marxism with force
when needed, but he went even further by announcing that depending on the
period under discussion his followers had either accomplished their mission
or were holding the communists in political and ideological chains.
He never ceased proclaiming himself the savior of Germany.
In the New Year's Proclamation
for 1 January 1932 Hitler stated:
Were
the National Socialist Movement to cease existing today as a counterbalance
to Marxism, Germany would be Bolshevist tomorrow.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 80
In Berlin on 13 September
1933:
We
have smashed international Marxist solidarity within our Volk in order
to give the millions of German workers another and better solidarity in
exchange. It is the solidarity of our own Volk,...
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 358
In an interview with
the American journalist, Baillie, on 28 November 1935:
Germany
will continue to fight Communism with the weapons which Communism itself
uses.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 732
In his address to the
political leaders of the Party at the Nuremberg Parteitag on 10 September
1937:
It
is a ridiculous undertaking to try to introduce into Germany once more
the disease which we have driven out. But if this attempt should
be undertaken from outside instead of from within our country, then we
all know: the German nation under the leadership of its Party will protect
Germany and never allow her to pass away.
And with this knowledge is bound up our faith. The Almighty has permitted
us to follow this wondrous path and He will bless us still.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1358
In that speech to the
Industry Club in Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932:
For though even today there are many in Germany who believe that we National
Socialists would not be capable of constructive work--they deceive themselves!
If we were not, already today there would be no more bourgeoisie alive
in Germany: the question Bolshevism or not Bolshevism would long ago have
been decided. Take the weight of our gigantic organization--by far
the greatest organization of the new Germany--out of the scale of the nationalist
fortunes and you will see that without us Bolshevism would already tip
the balance--a fact of which the best proof is the attitude adopted towards
us by Bolshevism. Personally I regard it as a great honor when Mr.
Trotsky calls upon German Communism at any price to act together with the
Social Democrats, since National Socialism must be regarded as the one
real danger for Bolshevism. That is for me all the greater honor....
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 821
In his Proclamation
to the Nuremberg Parteitag of 1933:
The
line which separated the National Socialists from the bourgeois parties
was their clear recognition of the conditions necessary for a successful
attack upon Marxism and their consequent action.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 196
In his Reichstag speech
on 7 March 1936:
I
do not believe that close association with the political doctrine and outlook
on life which are destructive of national existence can be helpful to statesmen.
We have had many experiences of this in Germany within the past 20 years.
The first contact with Bolshevism, in 1917, brought on us the revolution
itself a year later. The second time that Germany entered into relations
with Bolshevism the result was within a few years she herself was brought
to the brink of a communistic collapse. I severed that connection
and by so doing I saved the country from destruction.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1281
In a 28 March 1933
appeal to all party organizations:
We
were able to come to terms with the Marxist agitators in Germany; they
will not force us to our knees, even if they are now proceeding with their
renegade crimes against the people from abroad.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 301
In Nuremberg on 14
September 1936:
We
rejected and fought Bolshevism, not because it intended a revolution, but
because its leaders intended a slaughter, such as took place once in Russia
and now in Spain, and because we simply did not desire that our people
for a second time should be ashamed of the history of their past....
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 257
Hitler even claimed
to have saved art.
In Nuremberg on 9 September
1936 he stated:
In
Germany, therefore, the period of Bolshevik infatuation in art has come
to an end, for this Bolshevik and futurist art is anarchical retrogression.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 150
When the Frenchman,
Bertrand de Jouvenel, suggested in his 21 February 1936 interview with
Hitler that the latter rewrite his attacks on France in Mein Kampf Hitler
implicitly attributed weakness to France by stating:
I
must not lose sight of the fact that Soviet Russia is a political factor
which has at its disposal an explosive, revolutionary idea and a gigantic
store of arms. It is my duty as a German to account to myself for
such a situation. Bolshevism has no chance to penetrate in Germany,
but there are other major peoples who are less immune than we against the
Bolshevist bacillus.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 758
As far as Hitler was
concerned his ascendancy marked the elimination of Marxism and its destruction
was wholly attributable to the efforts of himself and his followers.
He would have mankind believe that he was not only saving Germany but he
saved Germany, past tense. In a Stuttgart speech on 15 February 1933
he said:
The
period of international Marxist disintegration and destruction is past.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 242
In the New Year’s message
of 1934 Hitler announced that:
Marxism
is destroyed and Communism trodden underfoot.... Marxism in Germany
exists no longer.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 668
I am not only the conqueror but also the executor of Marxism--of that part
of it that is essential and justified, stripped of its Jewish-Talmudic
dogma.
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION,
by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, page 185
In his closing speech
at the Nuremberg Parteitag of September 13, 1937:
Besides
for us Germans the thought that this Europe could be directed or ruled
from Moscow of all places is simply intolerable.... For us at least
the very idea of receiving orders from a world that stand so far below
us is as ridiculous as it is revolting....
There should be no illusions on the point: National Socialism has banished
the Bolshevist world peril from the domestic life of Germany: it has taken
care that the scum of Jewish writers who are alien to the German people
shall no longer play the dictator over the German proletariat, i.e. over
the German workman, but that the German people shall at length understand
its own mission and find in its own body its leaders. National Socialism
has, further, made our people and therefore the Reich immune from a Bolshevist
infection.... It was through our attacks upon this enemy that we
National Socialists gained our power. In a struggle lasting more
than 15 years we have in fact annihilated him--intellectually and in his
outlook on the world--and neither his countless murders and other acts
of violence nor the support which he received from the then Marxist rulers
of the Reich could stay our victorious march. Today we will keep
strict watch and ward that never again shall such a danger come upon Germany.
But should anyone venture to bring this danger from without to the frontiers
of Germany or to introduce this danger into Germany he should know that
the National Socialist State has forged for itself those weapons which
with lightning speed would crush any such attempt.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 710
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 941
On 28 March 1933 in
an appeal issued to all party organizations:
Now
that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the Volk
itself, what we have long been waiting for will now come to pass.
The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual instigators,
who, having made off with their capital stocks across the border in the
nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous campaign of
agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 298
In front of the
Rathaus in Wilhelmshafen on 1 April 1939:
State
after State will either fall a victim to the Jewish-Bolshevist plague or
must take measures for self-protection. That is what we have done
and we have now raised up a national German people's State.... Whether
the world will be Fascist, I know not! That it will be National Socialist
I do not believe. But that in the end this world will protect itself
from this Bolshevist menace, the gravest menace imaginable, of that I am
most profoundly convinced.
... Only when this Jewish bacillus infecting the life of peoples is destroyed
can one hope to bring about a co-operation of the nations founded on a
permanent understanding.... Abroad we are not perhaps loved, but
folk pay heed to us and respect us, and that is the decisive point!
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1601
Hitler would have everyone
believe saving Germany was a close call. In his Proclamation read
at the Nuremberg Parteitag of 1933 he said:
At
the beginning of this year there were weeks when we were but a hair's breadth
from Bolshevist chaos: National Socialism has done for Germany what Fascism
did for Italy.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 198
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1086
And he also sought
to persuade people that peasants played a key role in the process.
In a statement on the Enabling Act to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933 he
said:
Without
the counterweight of the German peasantry, Communist madness would already
have overrun Germany by now and thus conclusively destroyed the German
economy.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 280
As a result of his
repressive deeds, he announced the restoration of law and order, failing
to note, of course, that it was a placidity similar to that which one would
experience in a prison lockdown.
In an 18 October 1933 interview
with Ward Price of the Daily Mail Hitler stated:
Whereas
before our time, German streets and squares were controlled by Communism
and the entire Volk was suffering from the bloody terror of this arsonist
pack, we have now restored safety, law and order. That is the achievement
of my SA.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 383
Let
me tell you that the hardened criminal is in for a very bad time in Germany
in the near future;...
HITLER'S TABLE TALK,
1941-1944, Translated by Cameron & Stevens, 2000, page 68
And all too often “hardened”
criminals included those effectively and persistently opposing the Nazi
tyranny.
One of the most fortuitous events to occur in the Nazi era was
the burning of the Reichstag which occurred shortly after the Nazi takeover
and provided justification for the subsequent imposition of virtual martial
law. The parallels that can be drawn between this event and its aftermath
and what occurred in the US following 9/11 are unnerving to say the least.
Both were blamed on Enemy Number One and both fostered a series of laws,
rules, and regulations that were either unconstitutional or excessive and
beyond reasonable precautions. The Enabling Act, quickly passed following
the Reichstag Fire, bestowed upon Hitler dictatorial authority for all
practical purposes and marked the end of democracy in Germany. Hitler,
like Bush and his advisors, saw the opportunity a national catastrophe
provided and later gave an interesting account of the efforts made by him
and Goebbels to awaken others to the opportunity created. While recounting
this event during the early 1940’s he said:
During
the Reichstag fire, I went in the middle of the night to the offices of
the Voelkischer Beobachter. It took half an hour before I could find
anyone to let me in. Inside there were a few compositors sitting
around, eventually some sub-editor appeared heavy with sleep. He
was quite incapable of grasping what I was telling him, and kept on repeating:
"But really! There's no one here at this time of night; I must ask
you to come back during business hours!" "Are you mad!" I cried.
"Don't you realize that an event of incalculable importance is actually
now taking place!" In the end I got hold of Goebbels, and we worked
till dawn preparing the next day's edition.
HITLER'S TABLE TALK,
1941-1944, Translated by Cameron & Stevens, 2000, page 649
Because the Enabling
Act was so critical to the legalized subversion of Germany’s democracy,
because of its brevity, and because all Americans should be alert for similar
legislation, a detailed recitation of its contents is warranted.
The full name of the Enabling Act was Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk
und Reich (Law in Order to Remedy the Misery of the People and the Reich)
and, like so many escapades of the Bushites, such as the Patriot Act and
Operation Iraqi Freedom, was given a deceptive title for propaganda purposes.
As with most of the laws passed in the process of Gleichschaltung, the
Enabling Act is quite short, considering its consequences.
It states:
1. Other than through the procedure prescribed by the constitution, laws of the Reich may be decided upon by the government of the Reich as well. This includes laws as referred to by articles 85 subsection 2 and 87 of the constitution. [These articles refer to the parliamentary budget rights.]
2. Laws decided upon by the government of the Reich may deviate from the provisions of the constitution insofar as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat as such. The constitutional rights of the Reichspräsident shall remain intact.
3. Laws decided upon by the government of the Reich shall be issued by the Chancellor [i.e. Hitler] and announced in the Reich Law Gazette. They shall take effect on the day following the announcement, unless they prescribe a different date. Articles 68 to 77 of the constitution shall not be applied to laws decided upon by the government of the Reich. [These articles regulate the ordinary procedure of legislation.]
4. Contracts of the Reich with foreign states which affect matters of Reich legislation shall not require the approval of the bodies concerned with legislation. The government of the Reich shall issue the prescriptions required for the execution of such contracts.
5. This law shall take effect with the day of its announcement. It shall become invalid on April 1, 1937 or earlier, if the present Reich government is succeeded by a different one.
The provision within Article #2 stating “Laws decided upon by the government of the Reich may deviate from the provisions of the constitution insofar as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat as such” is sufficient within itself to destroy any semblance of democracy, as it’s only another way of saying the government, i.e., the Nazi leadership, can ignore the constitution any time of its choosing as long as the Reichstag and the Reichsrat remain unaffected.
While later addressing
those who passed the Act Hitler stated:
My
Party Comrades! Deputies! Men of the Reichstag! It is
to you who once established for me the foundation for my work by ratifying
the Enabling Act,...
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 1033
That’s only another
way of thanking them for granting him dictatorial powers. In a transparent
endorsement of the Enabling Act through fostering fear and uncertainty
Hitler said to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933:
The
disintegration of the nation into irreconcilably opposite Weltanschauungen
which was systematically brought about by the false doctrines of Marxism
means the destruction of the basis for any possible community life.
The dissolution permeates all of the basic principles of social order.
The completely opposite approaches of individuals to the concepts of state,
society, religion, morality, family, and economy rips open differences
which will lead to a war of all against all. Starting with the liberalism
of the past century, this development will end, as the laws of nature dictate,
in Communist chaos.
The mobilization of the most primitive instincts leads to a link between
the concepts of a political theory and the actions of real criminals.
Beginning with pillaging, arson, raids on the railway, assassination attempts,
and so on--all these things are morally sanctioned by Communist theory....
The burning of the Reichstag, one unsuccessful attempt within a large-scale
operation, is only a taste of what Europe would have to expect from a triumph
of this demonical doctrine.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 276
In a speech delivered
at the Ten Year Commemoration of the "Putsch" of 8-9 November 1923 the
Fuhrer summarized his attitude from the beginning by saying:
I have never fought shy of any adversary yet and I do not do so today.
For many a year I uttered warnings against Bolshevism, and the bourgeoisie
only laughed at me. I assess the Communists at what they in fact
are--a power which within Germany I could conquer because I restored order
in the internal life of our people. I do not fight shy of Communism
abroad because I know it for what it is worth and because I prepared the
German people beforehand against all eventualities. For if Communism
should ever desire to link itself up with us from abroad, then it will
share the same fate as it suffered within Germany. If ever this power
should seek to fall upon Germany, then the same thing would happen to it
as happened to the Communists who once thought that within Germany they,
too, could fall upon us. Here in Germany we cleared the streets,
and we would do this same in the other case.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 680
Approximately nine
months earlier on 8 February 1933 Hitler had already predicted the permanent
crushing of Marxism when he addressed the editors of those newspapers which
were favorable to his new government and said:
[I can assure you that] in 10 years there would be no more Marxism in Germany.
HITLER'S SPEECHES by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 498
Several years after
the destruction of Marxism in Germany he ventured so far as to contend,
without providing any specifics for corroboration, that Germany was in
the throes of progress, brotherhood and unity when, in fact, those who
refused to join the imposed love feast were either killed, imprisoned,
exiled, or terrorized into silence. In a speech to the Labor Service
on 10 September 1936 Hitler stated:
Here
there is building going on! Here there is comradeship! And
here above all is the faith in a better humanity and hence in a better
future! What a difference from another country in which Marxism is
attempting to gain power. There the cities are in flames, there the
villages are being reduced to rubble, there a man no longer knows whom
he can trust. Class is fighting against class, rank against rank,
brothers are destroying brothers. We have chosen the other path:
instead of tearing you apart, I have joined you together.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 832
After smashing Marxism
in Germany Hitler turned his attention to Europe in general feeling that
it too needed saving and was falling to Marxism. In a proclamation
at a party convention on 9 September 1936 he stated:
Unrest,
hate, and mistrust fill the world about us. With the exception of
one major Power and a few other States, we encounter throughout Europe
the convulsions of bolshevistic rioting and revolution.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 391
He repeatedly stated
that he quivered at the very thought of a Marxist victory in Europe.
On 7 March 1936 Hitler stated:
...I
tremble for Europe at the thought of what would lie in store for our old,
heavily populated continent were the chaos of the Bolshevist revolution
rendered successful by the infiltrating force of this destructive Asiatic
concept of the world, which subverts all our established ideals.
I am perhaps for many European statesmen a fantastic, or at any rate uncomfortable,
harbinger of warnings. That I am regarded in the eyes of the international
Bolshevist oppressors of the world as one of their greatest enemies is
for me a great honor and a justification for my actions in the eyes of
posterity.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 767
In a speech at the
Harvest Thanksgiving held on the Buckeberg on 4 October 1936:
For
to all of us it is clear that if Europe today were to sink into the madness
of Bolshevism then no one could help us, we should be left to our own resources.
And then we should either master our distress or distress would overwhelm
us.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 678
In his closing speech
to the Nuremberg Parteitag on 14 September 1936:
Every
successful rising of Bolshevism in one country encourages other countries.
If these methods succeed, Europe will go under in a sea of misery and blood.
European culture which has a history of nearly 2500 years would be superseded
by the most frightful barbarism of all times.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1331
At the opening of the
Electoral Campaign in the Sportpalast in Berlin on 24 October 1933:
...the
way which Europe went was the straight path to Bolshevism, and what this
Bolshevism would have meant for Europe, that I need not paint in detail.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1115
In Berlin on 7 February
1934 before a student gathering:
If
allowed to triumph in Europe, in the next 500 years Communism would necessarily
bring about the complete annihilation of even the last vestiges of the
fruits of that Aryan spirit which, providing the roots of culture and in
its many-faceted boughs and branches, has bestowed upon the entire world
the general foundations of our culture and thus our truly human foundations
in the millenniums upon which history has shed light.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 432
In a speech to the
Reichstag on 30 January 1937:
If in fact Europe does not awaken from the fever of its Bolshevist infections,
I fear that, despite the good intentions of individual statesmen, international
trade will not increase, but ultimately decrease. That is because
this trade is built not only upon the uninterrupted and thus secured production
on the part of one specific nation, but on the production of all nations.
Initially, however, one thing is certain: every single Bolshevist disruption
will of necessity lead to a more or less lengthy disruption in orderly
production.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 867
Feeling that Europe
was succumbing to Bolshevism and having destroyed Marxism in Germany, Hitler
concluded his next commission was to eradicate Marxism from Europe in general
and he made comments to that effect in many speeches. In Nuremberg
on 13 September 1937 the Fuhrer stated:
I
am merely stating a fact! Therefore we have a serious interest in
preventing this Bolshevistic plague from spreading even further in Europe.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 941
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 263
In his closing speech
at the Nuremberg Parteitag on 3 September 1933:
If
a single people in Western or Central Europe were to succumb to Bolshevism,
this poison would spread farther and would destroy that which is today
the oldest and fairest cultural treasure in the world. By taking
upon herself the struggle against Bolshevism Germany is but fulfilling,
as so often before in her history, a European mission.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 667
On 3 September 1933:
In
devoting ourselves in this way to caring for our own blood, a blood which
Fate has entrusted to us, we are best helping to protect other peoples
from diseases which spread from race to race and from Volk to Volk.
If a single Volk were to fall prey to Bolshevism in Western or Central
Europe, this poison would continue its corrosive work and devastate today's
oldest and most beautiful cultural possession on earth. In taking
this fight upon itself, Germany is but fulfilling, as so often in its history,
a truly European mission.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 357
In his speech in the
Reichstag on 30 January 1937:
The
Treaty of Versailles brought the first division of Europe--a division of
the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the
latter nations being outlawed; the second division has been caused by the
Bolshevist doctrine which its exponents try to enforce on all nations.
Our attack upon Bolshevism has been not only in defense of our own civilization,
but in defense of European civilization as a whole.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1338
In the same speech:
For
Mr. Eden, Bolshevism is perhaps something sitting in Moscow; for us, however,
Bolshevism is a plague against which we have been forced to defend ourselves
in a bloody fight; a plague that has attempted to make of our country the
same desert it has made of Spain, that had begun the same shooting of hostages
we were now witnessing in Spain! National Socialism did not seek
contact with Bolshevism in Russia; rather, the Jewish international Muscovite
Bolshevism attempted to penetrate Germany! And it is still attempting
to do so today! And we have fought a difficult battle against this
attempt, upholding and thus defending not only the culture of our Volk,
but perhaps that of Europe as a whole in the process.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 868
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 412
And also in that speech:
In
January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle
against this barbarism was being fought out, had Germany been defeated
and had the Bolshevik field of destruction and death extended over Central
Europe, perhaps a different opinion would have risen on the banks of the
Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 260
In his closing speech
at the Nuremberg Parteitag of 1937:
Four
years past, for instance, it [The League of Nations] has been forced to
spread its energies on trying to support the various Marxist and Jewish
emigrants to keep them alive.
I am only stating facts. We have a very real interest in seeing to
it that this Bolshevist plague shall not spread over Europe....
In this community of the civilized nations of Europe Jewish World Bolshevism
is an absolutely alien body which makes not the smallest contribution to
our economic life or to our civilization but only creates confusion.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 707
In his New Year’s Proclamation
issued on 1 January 1936:
To
remain such a bulwark of national European discipline and civilization
against the Bolshevist enemy of mankind will in the coming year, too, be
our fervent endeavor. The Bolshevist attempt, through continual revolutions,
bloody uprisings, and disturbances, to undermine the order of the world
and to incite peoples one against the other we in Germany, in the future
as in the past, shall successfully counter.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1257
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 648
In his New Year’s Proclamation
to the Party on 1 January 1937:
Germany
will ever be, even more than in the past, a bulwark of European culture
and civilization against the Bolshevist foe of humanity, and thereby at
the same time a sure guarantor of a strong European peace.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1333
To the Reichstag on
7 March 1936:
In
the year 1932, Germany stood at the brink of a Bolshevist collapse.
What this chaos in such a large country would have meant for Europe is
something perhaps certain European statesmen will have an opportunity to
observe elsewhere in the future. For my part, I was only able to
overcome this crisis of the German Volk, which was most visibly manifest
in the economic sector, by mobilizing the ethical and moral values common
to the German nation. The man who wanted to rescue Germany from Bolshevism
would have to bring about a decision on--and thus a solution for--the question
of Germany’s quality of rights. Not in order to do harm to other
peoples, but on the contrary: to perhaps even spare them great harm by
preventing a catastrophe from engulfing Germany, the ultimate consequences
of which would be unimaginable for Europe.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 765
And in his speech to
the Reichstag on 23 March 1933:
...for
the elimination of communism in Germany is a purely domestic German affair.
The rest of the world may well have just as great an interest in it, for
the outbreak of communistic chaos in the densely populated German Reich
would lead to political and economic consequences of inconceivable extent,
especially in the rest of Western Europe.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1015
Not surprising is the
fact that Hitler denied any responsibility for the Reichstag Fire as Bush
denies any responsibility for 9/11. In all fairness evidence incriminating
the former is far in excess of that which implicates the latter, despite
claims to the contrary by some. Bush and his cohorts do not appear
to have yet taken America to a juncture of that magnitude. Unlike
the Hitlerites, the Bushites are merely capitalizing on an unforeseen event,
as opposed to having induced it. While denying culpability during
an interview with Mr. Sefton Delmer, the correspondent of the Daily Express,
Hitler replied to the suggestion that the Reichstag Fire "was nothing but
a put-up job” designed to give Hitler the pretext for waging a merciless
war against the Communists and Socialists by saying:
It
is nothing but a damned lie and a malicious libel. As base as it
is ridiculous.
Of course, there is one way
in which I could settle these reports once and for all. I could have
the Communist who was caught hanged from the nearest tree. That would
dispose forever of this vile insinuation that he is an agent of ours.
But these lies are really too absurd even to discuss seriously. But
I would tell you another thing. Europe, instead of suspecting me
of false play, should be grateful to me for my drastic action against the
Bolsheviks. If Germany went Communist, as there was every danger
of her doing until I became Chancellor, it would not have been long before
the rest of civilized Europe fell a prey to this Asiatic pest.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 234
If it is a malicious
libel, then how is Hitler to explain strong testimony incriminating him
in this matter provided by one who associated on a personal basis with
the Nazi hierarchy and is certainly in a position to know first hand.
Rauschnigg provides evidence against Hitler that, were comparable information
to surface against Bush regarding 9/11, would be the basis for extremely
serious criminal proceedings not to mention destruction of his political
career:
"Shortly after the
Reichstag fire,... while waiting in the lobby of the Reich Chancellery,
we [Gauleiter Forster & myself] got into conversation with some of
the Nazis celebrities who were also waiting there. Goering, Himmler,
Frick and a number of Gauleiter from the western provinces were talking
together. Goering was giving details of the Reichstag fire, the secret
of which was still being carefully guarded. I myself had unhesitatingly
ascribed it to arson on the part of persons under Communist, or at any
rate Comintern, influence. It was not until I heard this conversation
that I discovered that the National Socialist leadership was solely responsible,
and that Hitler knew of the plan and approved it.
... Goering described
how "his boys" had entered the Reichstag building by a subterranean passage
from the President's Palace, and how they had only a few minutes at their
disposal and were nearly discovered. He regretted that the "whole
shack" had not burnt down. They had been so hurried that they could
not "make a proper job of it." Goering, who had taken the leading
part in the conversation, closed with the significant words:
'I have no conscience. My conscience is Adolf Hitler.'
It was he [Goering]
who ordered the Reichstag building to be burnt at Hitler's command.
He took the responsibility upon himself, just as he did that of the murders
on 30 June 1934, of the bourgeois Nationalists, because he considered Hitler
too soft and vacillating. And this is the essential difference between
Hitler and Goering, that the former, before he can 'act,' must always lash
himself out of lethargy and doubts into a frenzy. But in Goering
amorality is second nature."
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION,
by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, pages 77-78
Hitler’s justification
for his assistance to Franco’s fascists during the Spanish Civil War was
that he was saving Spain and, thus, Europe from Marxism just as Bush’s
involvement in Iraq is now being depicted as intervention required to save
the world from al Qaeda and terrorism. Both operated under what they
viewed as a perceived threat, as opposed to an actual or proven one.
Hitler reiterated his message on many occasions and Bush uses similar arguments.
In his speech at the the
Reichstag held on 20 February 1938 the Fuhrer said:
The
German Government would see in the bolshevizing of Spain not only an element
detrimental to the peace of Europe, but also one disturbing to the balance
of power on the Continent. If Spain were to become a section of the
Moscow Center, there would be grave danger of the spread of this plague
of annihilation and destruction, the consequences of which we could under
no circumstance view with indifferent calm. We are indeed happy in
the knowledge that our anti-Bolshevist attitude is also shared by another
state [Italy].
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1399
In his closing speech
at the Nuremberg Parteitag of 1937:
We
know with absolute certainty that if Spain were to become finally Bolshevist
and if this wave had spread wider, perhaps over the rest of Europe, or
if in the future it should so spread--and Bolshevism itself asserts that
this will certainly happen and that at least is its wish--then that for
Germany would mean a severe economic catastrophe.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 706
In reply to a telegram
of greeting sent by Franco:
In
the sure conviction that the battle which we have waged in common against
Bolshevism, the destroyer of culture and of peoples, has formed a tie of
indissoluble community between the German and the Spanish peoples,...
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1675
If
I had not decided in 1936 to send him the first of our Junker aircraft,
Franco would never have survived.
HITLER'S TABLE TALK,
1941-1944, Translated by Cameron & Stevens, 2000, page 607
On 6 August 1937 at
the reception for the ambassador of Nationalist Spain Hitler expressed
his keen sympathy:
...'with the heroic fight of the Spanish people and with the effort to
build up the Spanish state' and the hope that General Franco might 'succeed
in winning for the Spanish people peace and freedom.'
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1356
In his closing speech
at the Nuremberg Parteitag on 13 September 1937:
It
is a gross perversion of the facts to maintain that the Bolshevist oppressors
of the people are in that country [Spain] the representatives of legal
authority, while the fighters of Nationalist Spain are illegal revolutionaries.
No! We see in general Franco's men the genuine and above all the
permanent Spain and in the usurpers of Valencia as the hireling international
revolutionary troop of Moscow which today ravages Spain and tomorrow perhaps
again some other State. Can we now remain neutral in the face of
such happenings as these?
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 702
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 940
In a speech in Berlin
on 28 April 1939:
...for
if subhuman forces of Bolshevism had proved victorious in Spain they might
easily have spread across the whole of Europe....
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 652
In Nuremberg on 13
September 1937:
In
England and France, one professes to be worried about the idea that Spain
might even be occupied by Italy or Germany; we are just as appalled in
the face of the possibility that it might be conquered by Soviet Russia!
By no means would this conquest have to be effected in the form of an occupation
by Soviet Russian troops; rather, it will become a fait accompli at that
moment when a Bolshevized Spain has become a section, i.e. an integral
component, of the Central Bolshevist Office in Moscow--a branch which receives
both its political directives and its material subsidies from there.
In any case, we principally regard every attempt to further expand Bolshevism
in Europe as a shift in the European balance of power.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 940
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 703
In a speech to an assembly
of NSDAP Kreisleiters on 29 April 1937:
However,
it is desirable for us not to have a Bolshevist state in existence there
[Spain], which might form a land bridge connecting France and North Africa.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 890
In his Reichstag speech
on 30 January 1937:
The
case of Spain, from which country 15,000 Germans have been driven out,
shows the danger of the Bolshevist infection.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1337
In his Reichstag speech
on 20 February 1938:
Or
that Bolshevist revolution, which slaughtered millions upon millions of
people and whose blood-stained murderers hold positions of high esteem
in the councils of democratic institutions? Or should I recall the
carnage of the Marxist mob in Spain, whose victims, according to estimates
of cautious men who themselves come from the lands of democracy, number
half a million or more?
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1379
And finally, in Berlin
on 26 April 1942:
All
of us remember, however, the latest and the decisive duel in Spain where,
under the leadership of one man a clear and unequivocal decision was forced;
and where, after a bloody civil war, the national revolution conquered
the Bolshevik arch-enemy.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 84
In claiming he had
saved Germany from Bolshevism Hitler simultaneously alleged he had saved
Europe itself. In Berlin on 14 October 1933 he stated:
If the Red Revolution had overswept Germany like a firebrand, then the
cultural countries of western Europe would have soon learned that it was
not a matter of indifference to them whether on the Rhine and on the North
Sea a spiritually revolutionary and expanding Asiatic power stood watch,
or the peaceful German peasants and working men who in genuine comradeship
with the other nations of our European culture wished only to earn their
daily bread by honest labor. In saving Germany from this threatening
catastrophe, the National Socialist Movement saved not only the German
nation but also did a historical service to the whole of Europe.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 203
In Berlin on 21 May
1935:
Bolshevism
was defeated in a decisive struggle. National Socialism has saved
Germany, and perhaps all Europe, from the most frightful catastrophe of
all time.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 256
Victory over “bolshevist”
control in Spain was achieved by Germany working in conjunction with its
closest ally, Italy, just as America’s recent victory over Baathist rule
in Iraq was accomplished through unity with its closest ally, Britain.
In referring to this success in a speech before the Reichstag on 30 January
1939 Hitler said:
The
solidarity of these two regimes [Italy and Germany] is therefore more than
a matter of egotistic expediency. On this solidarity is founded the
salvation of Europe from its threatened destruction by Bolshevism.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1576
In Berlin on 30 January
1939 he noted the alleged contribution of Germany and Italy to European
salvation:
What
Fascism has done for the preservation of civilization is as yet incalculable.
Who can stroll through Rome or Florence without being moved at the thought
of the fate that all these unique documents of human art and civilization
would have suffered if Mussolini and his Fascist Movement had not succeeded
in saving Italy from Bolshevism.... On this solidarity [between Germany
and Italy] is founded the salvation of Europe from its threatened destruction
by Bolshevism.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 290
Hitler felt that some
European nations had already saved themselves and were in no need of German
intervention. In Obersalzberg on 31 August 1938 he stated:
The
greatest threat to Europe is that of a Bolshevist permeation, a threat
similar to that in Germany at the time. I no longer think that such
a permeation is possible in countries such as Holland, Belgium, and France.
These countries have vanquished the Russo-Asiatic communism. While
internal crises may and will take place there yet, France will not, for
instance, fall prey to this philosophy of destruction.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 1137
And he warned France
of bolshevism when he said:
They
[the British and French] will have to defend themselves against Jewish
and Marxist intrigues.
SECRET CONVERSATIONS
WITH HITLER, Edited by Edouard Calic, 1971. Page 63
Hitler eventually concluded
not only European but Western Civilization itself was at risk and sounded
the alarm. In his closing speech at the Parteitag in Nuremberg on
3 September 1933 he said:
If in West or Central Europe but one single people were to fall a victim
to Bolshevism, this poison would continue its ravages, it would devastate
the oldest, the fairest civilization which can today be found upon this
earth.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 481
In an interview with
The Times correspondent in Berlin on 14 October 1930:
The
Bolshevization of Russia had already given the whole civilized world a
jolt; if Germany became an annex of Bolshevist Russia, Western civilization
would get a much worse and probably fatal jolt.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 998
And because of this
assessment of the overall situation he unilaterally expanded the area under
his “protective” umbrella to include all of Western civilization.
In an interview with Mr. Baillie of the United Press in November 1935 he
said:
Germany
is the bulwark of the West against Bolshevism.... Germany will continue
to fight Communism with whatever weapons Communism itself selects.
We will meet propaganda with propaganda, terror with terror, and violence
with violence.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 668
Never one to prefer
micro-management over macro management Hitler understandably came to the
ultimate conclusion that he must save the entire world from bolshevism
just as Bush has concluded his role is one of saving the world from al
Qaeda and terrorism. How could his goal be clearer when he says:
... the Bolshevism which it is our sacred goal to save the world from.
HITLER--MEMOIRS OF
A CONFIDANT, by Otto Wegener, 1985, page 44
In an interview with
Rothay Reynolds, correspondent of the Daily Mail, after the great National
Socialist victory in the election of 1930 Hitler stated:
To
have a strong party in Germany which will form a bulwark against Bolshevism
is in the interest not only of England but also of all nations.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 993
We
shall rouse the anti-communist forces in all countries. If we do
not do so, one day we shall be threatened both militarily and politically
by this bolshevist Russia. The political threat will be there on
the very day we seize power. Even today, therefore, we are thinking
of an anti--Comintern policy in all countries. Once Germany is provided
with a modern army, the Soviet Union would never be a danger to her.
But this Weimar Germany will be an easy prey for the bolshevists.
SECRET CONVERSATIONS
WITH HITLER, Edited by Edouard Calic, 1971. Page 61
In the Voelkischer
Beobachter of December 13/14, 1931:
At
the time of the foundation of our Movement, Germany stood for the first
time on the brink of Bolshevism. From that day on, the Movement had
as its first principle the prevention, under any circumstances, of a development
which would surrender such a great people as the German people to Bolshevism
and therewith to cultureless barbarism.
We were convinced already 12 years ago, as we are today, that the victory
of Communism in Germany would be the beginning of a general world catastrophe.
The political, cultural and economic life of the civilized nations is so
interwoven that a blow directed against Germany would undeniably be immediately
felt beyond her borders. All the hopes for the recovery of the world
from the present suffering and shame would have to be buried at that moment
when the Red Soviet flag would be carried from Moscow as far as Hamburg
and Heidelberg. The effects on the world would be inconceivable.
The struggle against this danger is a tremendous and difficult one.
The political and economic treatment of Germany prescribed by an unreasonable
hate since the dictate of Versailles is responsible for breeding over 6,000,000
full-fledged Communists among us, who declare themselves the advance guard
of the world revolution from Moscow. In America Communism is as yet
comparatively insignificant. If there were in America in the same
ratio [as in Germany] 12,000,000 Communists with the same tendencies and
the same objectives, then America would understand the necessity of our
Movement and America would then take up the struggle against this world
pest with the greatest determination.
In view of this great danger I should like to hope, as a German National
Socialist, that out of an inner impulse for self-preservation, America
will also be sympathetic toward our struggle and that America will help
in removing at least some of the causes of Bolshevism.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 345
In a speech to the
Reichstag on 30 January 1937:
The
second fracture [of Europe] arose as a result of the proclamation of the
Bolshevist doctrine, one of whose integral components is that it does not
confine itself to a single people but aims to be forced upon all peoples.
At issue here is not a special form of life indigenous to, let us say,
the Russian people; rather, it is the Bolshevist goal of world revolution.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 868
A Bolshevik victory
would destroy the world according to Hitler just as would an al Qaeda/terrorist
victory according to Bush:
If
Bolshevism triumphed, mankind would lose the gift of laughter and joy.
It would become merely a shapeless mass, doomed to greyness and despair.
HITLER'S TABLE TALK,
1941-1944, Translated by Cameron & Stevens, 2000, page 322
There was no doubt
in the Fuhrer’s mind that although Germany was immune to bolshevism the
rest of the world was not. In his closing speech at the Nuremberg
Parteitag of 1937 he said:
So
far as we are concerned, Germany like present-day Italy has already become
immune from this danger; i.e. National Socialism, like Fascism, has sought
to remove from the organism of our people those weaknesses which might
have favored the inflow of Bolshevist poisons....
Yet however secure may be the position of Germany today--in spite of the
persistent efforts of the criminal organization in Moscow to smuggle into
Germany its agents and its disintegrating propaganda--we are convinced
that a great part of the world about us is utterly insecure....
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 694
For ulterior as opposed
to humanitarian motives Hitler gave unemployment the highest billing on
the agenda of social ills to be fought in Germany. It lie at the
apex of his ‘hit list’ and he made that apparent on numerous occasions.
In his speech on 17 April
1934 to the organizers of the Winter-Help Campaign he said:
For
the moment our whole effort is concentrated unreservedly on the struggle
against unemployment.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 891
In a speech inaugurating
the second year's battle against unemployment addressed to workers at Unterhaching
on 21 March 1934:
Unemployment
is the gigantic problem which is set before us for solution: in face of
that problem everything else must take second-place.
From the very day when we assumed power we were convinced that we had to
master this evil, and we were determined ruthlessly to subordinate everything
else to the fight against this evil.
MY NEW ORDER by Hitler,
Edited by Raoul de Roussy de Sales, 1941, Page 248
In a speech near Munich
on 21 March 1934:
The
fight for saving the Mittelstand [the middle-class] is primarily also a
fight against unemployment. This is the one gigantic problem which
we are to solve and in view of which everything else must come second.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 442
In the same speech:
At
the head of our present programme I would place once again the demand raised
last year: the battle against unemployment! Create work and thereby
create bread and life!
In the year which lies before us we must wage the campaign against unemployment
with still greater fanaticism, with still greater determination than in
the year which is past. With ruthless severity we must repel everyone
who offends against this idea and its realization.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 887
Also in the same speech:
Above
all, as a menacing danger, they're loomed the scourge of distress--Unemployment.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 879
In the great Machinery
Hall at Elbing on 5 November 1933:
The
problem of unemployment must be solved: we have not an unlimited time for
the task, and on the solution of this problem everything depends, not only
for a State but for everyone.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1134
In his speech on May
Day 1934:
I
do not imagine that when we have solved the problem of unemployment there
will be nothing more for us to do: I have never asserted that there are
no other tasks awaiting us. But I can assure our critics that we
will never rest until we have first accomplished this one task; and I can
further assure them that we are not accomplishing this task in order then
to lay us down to sleep.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 893
In a proclamation at
a party convention on 9 September 1936:
We
are less interested in whether the upper classes get so and so much butter
all the year round, but we are greatly concerned to assure cheaper fats
for the broad masses and, most of all, to keep them from unemployment.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 393
In an interview with
Louis Lochner of the Associated Press on 4 April 1934:
Naturally
the first step must be to eliminate the scourge of unemployment.
However, as soon as our Volk has work again, buying power will also increase,
and then the logical next step is an increase in the standard of living....
I also believe that it is absolutely right that an invention should first
be the property of the inventor;...
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 444
In a statement to the
Reichstag regarding the Enabling Act on 23 March 1933:
The
stagnation of millions of human working hours is madness and a crime which
must inevitably lead to the impoverishment of all.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 281
And in Munich on 24
February 1941:
For
we, the poor, have abolished unemployment because we no longer pay homage
to this madness [maintaining the gold standard], because we regard our
entire economic existence as a production problem and no longer as a capitalistic
problem. We placed the whole organized strength of the nation, the
discipline of the entire nation, behind our economic policy. We explained
to the nation that it was madness to wage internal economic wars between
the various classes, in which they all perish together.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolph Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 336
Hitler’s reference to himself as poor is blatant duplicity of the most egregious order. Talk about playing to the gallery!
Hitler devoted enormous
energy to the elimination of any and all internal societal failings that
engendered Marxism and none were judged by him to be more conducive to
the growth of bolshevism than unemployment. That accounts for its
position at the top of his social agenda. Eradication of the primary
base for Marxism was his ulterior motive and altruism was not even a factor.
He repeatedly proclaimed unemployment to be the major economic evil not
out of any sympathy for the beleaguered masses but only to forestall the
growth of Marxism. Joblessness was seen as the sine qua non perpetrator
of ideological subversion and on more than one occasion Hitler made no
secret of his views in this matter.
On 28 October 1933 he spoke
in Stuttgart and said:
The
scourge of unemployment was the fruitful soil for the growth of Bolshevism,
which, as a doctrine of madness, would only complete the catastrophe and
would infect not merely Germany but the whole world.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1125
In that illuminating
speech at the Industry Club in Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932:
And
in this I am not taking into account what, in my judgment, is at the present
moment the worst evil, an evil which I would characterize as not merely
economic but in the highest sense of the word a national--volkic--evil--I
mean unemployment.
... Do you believe that when 7 or 8 million men have found themselves for
10 or 20 years excluded from the national process of production that for
these masses Bolshevism could appear as anything else than the logical
theoretical complement of their actual, practical, economic situation?
Do you really believe that the purely spiritual side of this catastrophe
can be overlooked and that one day it will not transform itself into bitter
reality--the evil curse following on the evil deed?
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 802
The
crisis has not yet reached its peak. Unemployment cannot be dealt
with by weekly contributions and soup kitchens. Unemployment and
the economic crisis are grist to the communist mill.
SECRET CONVERSATIONS
WITH HITLER, Edited by Edouard Calic, 1971. Page 22
In one of those comments
that no doubt account for much of Hitler’s national support by the downtrodden,
he derided all attempts to minimize the agony of joblessness by saying
being unemployed is far worse than the word itself sounds.
In that infamous speech
to the Industry Club in Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932 he said:
With
this word of employment one is but shamefacedly seeking to put a better
appearance upon hard facts: for the proper term is not "workless" but "existence-less"
and therefore in truth "superfluous." It is the characteristic feature
of our European nations that gradually a certain percentage of the population
is proved statistically to be superfluous.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 800
As a counterbalance
to unemployment and to combat bolshevism Hitler had no hesitancy about
supporting public works projects and said as much.
In an interview with Anne
McCormick on 10 July 1933 he said:
You
ask me what we are going to do on the economic front. The first big
step is the program of public works.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 866
In Berlin on 1 May
1933:
And
this leads to yet another task: elimination of unemployment by a program
providing employment. We are dividing this employment program into
two parts. First of all, there is private provision of employment...
We will also attempt to provide public employment opportunities on a large
scale within the current year. We are installing a program which
we do not want to pass on to posterity, the program of building a new road
system, a gigantic undertaking which will require billions. We will
sweep away resistance and make a great beginning. We will thereby
introduce a series of public works projects which will help to steadily
decrease the unemployment rate.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 315
In another grab for
mass support Hitler sang a melodious but deceptive aria that entranced
many German workers and has been employed with some variations by Bush,
the latter’s supporters, and many of his predecessors.
In a speech in Nuremberg
on 1 September 1933 he stated:
Among
the tasks we face, the most important is the question of eliminating unemployment.
The danger in unemployment is not only a material one. It is neither
logical, nor moral, nor just, to continue taking away from those who are
able to work a part of the fruits of their industry in order to maintain
those unable to work--no matter for what reasons they are unable.
It is more logical to distribute the work itself instead of distributing
wages. No one has a moral right to demand that others should work
for him so that he will not have to work himself. Each has a right
to demand that the political organization of his nation, the State, find
ways and means to give work to all.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 194
And finally, after
being in power for approximately 4 years Hitler proclaimed victory over
unemployment and, thus, concocted an additional deception of the German
people. In Nuremberg on 7 September 1937 he said:
It
is a fact that Germany has solved its most pressing social problem, and
solved it absolutely: there are no longer any real unemployed in our country.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 923
Not only did Hitler
confront unemployment by fair means and foul, but he dealt with the closely
associated topic of the unions in his own iniquitous style. To Hitler
the unions were a breeding ground for Marxism and his task was to separate
the two under the guise of protecting the workers from negative influences
and leading elements seeking only personal aggrandizement.
In a speech at the First
Congress of German Workers on 10 May 1933 he said:
Marxism,
as a conception of the world with disintegration for its aim, saw with
keen insight that the trade-union movement offered it the possibility in
the future of conducting its attack against the State and against human
society with an absolutely annihilating weapon. Not with any idea
of helping the worker--what is the worker of any country to these apostles
of internationalism? Nothing at all! They never see him!
They themselves are no workers: they are litterateurs, an alien Gang!
They saw clearly that by means of the trade-union movement and through
a most friendly encouragement of excesses perpetrated by the other side
they could most easily procure for themselves an instrument which would
both conduct the fight and on the other hand would provide them with their
livelihood. For throughout these decades political Social Democracy
[the Left Wing Parties in general] has lived from this battle and from
this fighting-organization. One had to inoculate the trade union
with the idea: You are an instrument of the class-war and that war in the
last resort can find its political leaders only in Marxism. What
is then more comprehensible than that one should also pay one's tribute
to the leadership? And the tribute was exacted in full measure.
These gentlemen have not been content with a tithe: they demanded a considerably
higher rate of interest.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 846
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 320
Several times he openly
admitted the Nazis were taking over the unions.
In his proclamation issued
on New Year's Day 1934 Hitler said:
We
have endeavored to free economic life from those parasites who saw the
safety of their own existence in organizing divisions amongst the people.
We have accordingly taken the organizations out of the hands of the international
Marxist destroyers of our trades unions as they were originally conceived,...
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 641
In his speech on May
Day 1934:
When
on 2 May we began the destruction of the party-system in Germany by laying
hands upon the trade unions, that was done not in order to rob any Germans
of representative institutions serving a useful purpose, but to free the
German people from those organizations the greatest abuse of which was
that they were forced to encourage abuses in order to prove the necessity
for their own existence. By so acting we have rescued the German
people from an incalculable amount of internal strife and discord which
benefited no one save those who were directly interested in maintaining
that discord, but always wrought fatal mischief upon the whole people.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 892
At the Congress of
the German Labor Front in Berlin on 10 May 1933:
I must now speak of another measure, the freeing of the present existing
unions from the influence of those men who believe that they possess in
those unions a last line of defense.... We are taking them over,
not to preserve everything in the same form for the future but to save
for the German working-man all that he had put by in these organizations
in the way of savings and, furthermore, in order that the German worker
might cooperate in the building of the new state, to enable him to do this
on a basis of equality. We are not erecting a state against him;
no, with him must the new state be built up.
THE HITLER DECREES,
by James Pollock and Harlow Heneman, 1934, Page 75
But far more revealing
are his candid admissions that the unions were being destroyed by his forces.
The executions occurred in a manner not too dissimilar from that employed
decades later against the Air Traffic Controllers’ Union (Patco) by Bush’s
ideological predecessor Ronald Reagan. The reasons were different
but the methods and outcome bore an eerie resemblance.
In a Reichstag speech on
21 May 1935 Hitler stated:
The
destruction of the trade unions, both of employers and employees, which
were based on the class struggle, demanded an analogous removal of the
political parties which were maintained by these groups of interests, which
interests in return supported them.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 911
During an electoral
campaign in a speech delivered to an audience of German workmen in Berlin
on 10 November 1933:
...all
class organizations--not merely the trade unions--had been destroyed....
I answer: the first thing was to get men back to work.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 2, Page 1141
How one accomplishes
the latter while performing the former is anyone’s presumption.
In an attempt to exonerate
rank and file workers from responsibility for their alleged predicament
while masquerading as their benefactor Hitler sought to dissociate the
workers from any adherence to Marxism initially.
In Mein Kampf he said:
It
was an unequaled absurdity to identify the German worker with Marxism in
the days of August, 1914. In those hours the German worker had disentangled
himself from the embrace of this poisonous plague, as otherwise he would
never have been able to start this fight.
MEIN KAMPF, Adolph
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 218
While destroying the
unions under the guise of protecting the workers, he was quick to dissociate
the union movement in general from anti-patriotic sentiments by saying:
It
is nonsense and, furthermore, untrue that the union movement in itself
is unpatriotic. Quite the contrary is true.
MEIN KAMPF, Adolph
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 61
Despite all his pro-worker,
as opposed to pro-union rhetoric, Hitler and his allies stripped the worker
of his primary weapon--the right to strike--in any struggle against property
owners. The following comments are quite similar to Reagan’s comments
prior to the strike of one particular union, Patco. Bush’s mentor,
Reagan, did to one union, what Hitler did to all of them.
In a speech to the Reichstag
on 30 January 1937 Hitler stated:
It
is quite clear that neither strikes nor lockouts can be tolerated in a
sphere where such views prevail. The National Socialist State does
not recognize an economic law of the jungle. The common interest
of the nation--i.e. of our Volk--has priority over the interests of all
its competing components.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 863
In a speech in Berlin
on 30 January 1937:
There
will be no strikes or lockouts in Germany, because everyone has to serve
the interest of the entire nation.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolph Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 409
In his speech at the
Second Workers' Congress of the Labor Front on 16 May 1934:
...But
in fact no one can tolerate strikes. Just as a people, ordered in
a community, cannot permit an individual to fight out his dispute with
another with the fist, so also in the economic sphere. It is always
the whole nation which suffers. Sixty millions have to foot the bill
only because two cannot come to an agreement. Over both parties there
must naturally stand another-- a higher authority, and that is the authority
of the community, the authority of the State, which must be completely
impartial, completely free.... The State is the bailiff neither of
the employer nor of the workman: it stands above both the interested parties,
its task is to safeguard unity according to the laws of equity, justice,
and reason which are the same for all of us. And he who refuses to
observe those laws will find that above his individual profit stands the
common profit of the nation whose representatives we are. Only so
can this problem be solved.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 900
And in the same speech:
...to
let loose a strike is sheer madness--just as mad as to give support to
the unemployed without demanding any service in return. The community
of the people does not exist to burden one part of the nation in favor
of the other. Work must be created.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 899
In his Reichstag speech
on 30 January 1937:
It
is quite clear that, under the aegis of such an outlook on economic life,
strikes and lock-outs can no longer be tolerated. The National Socialist
State repudiates the right of economic coercion. Above all contracting
parties stand the economic interests of the nation, which are the interests
of the people.
... While in other countries strikes or lock-outs shatter the stability
of national production, our millions of productive workers obey the highest
of all laws that we have in this world, namely the law of common sense.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 938
And lastly, strikes,
especially general strikes, were anathema to Hitler because they were considered
merely political instruments used by Marxists.
In a speech at the First
Congress of German Workers on 10 May 1933 he said:
This
class-war leads to the proclamation of the trade union as simply an instrument
for the representation of the economic interests of the working classes
and therewith for the purposes of the general strike. Thus the general
strike appears for the first time as a means for exercising political power
and shows what Marxism really hoped to gain from this weapon--not a means
for the salvation of the worker, but on the contrary only an instrument
of war for the destruction of the State which opposed Marxism.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 847