Hitler blamed the ills
of Germany, indeed the world, not only on Marxists, Socialists, Jews, democracies,
and parliaments but on a current favorite whipping boy of nearly all American
radio talk show hosts, i.e., liberalism. Because liberalism, as opposed
to Marxism, has a far larger following on the American political scene
it receives far more attacks, assaults, and denunciations from American
Rightists. What is worthy of note is that current denunciations of
liberalism on the American landscape sometimes mirror attacks leveled decades
earlier by Hitler himself. The liberalism of the Nazi era was seen
as the enemy by Hitlerites, even though some of the criticisms are of a
different nature than those spewed out today.
The tone begins to
materialize when Hitler utters comments such as:
What
you preach is liberalism, nothing but liberalism.
HITLER AND I by Otto
Strasser, 1940, page 107
Hitler attributes multiple
ills to liberalism such as:
It
imprisons the mind. As yet, almost everyone is imprisoned in the
liberalistic attitude.
HITLER--MEMOIRS OF
A CONFIDANT, by Otto Wegener, 1985, page 56
It is corruption destroying
the state:
In
the liberalistic state, this may be a matter for each individual to resolve
alone. That is what they call human rights, free control of one's
own person, democratic liberty! In reality, it is slovenliness, decadence,
a tendency to snobbish gangsterism and nihilism, which cannot help but
eventually lead to the decline of Volk and state.
HITLER--MEMOIRS OF
A CONFIDANT, by Otto Wegener, 1985, page 282
It destroys relations
between nations.
The preface to the Italian
edition of Mein Kampf states:
...the "immortal ideas" of liberalism which confuse and destroy the relations
between nations.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 446
Hitler claimed liberalism
had failed to save Germany just as American talk show hosts claim it has
failed to save the United States. At the Tempelhof Airport on 28
September 1937 he stated:
In
our country, the ideals of Liberalism and Democracy have not rescued the
German nation from the worst violations conceivable in history. Therefore,
National Socialism has had to establish a new and more effective ideal
in order to restore to our Volk those basic human rights which had been
denied it for one-and-a-half decades.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 948
It fosters unfettered
science:
The
idea of free and unfettered science, unfettered by hypotheses, could only
occur in the age of Liberalism. It is absurd.
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION,
by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, page 223
Very much in line with
crypto-fascist radio talk show attacks on liberalism, Hitler alleged liberals
are cowards who foment degeneracy:
Again
and again [during WWI] I was surprised at the courage of simple men, how
they performed heroic acts as a matter of course. Only liberals remain
cowards, even in battle.
Their world ends with their skin. Therefore they are afraid of losing
their skins. They cannot conceive of anything greater and more significant
than their skin. They do not believe in sacrifice. Patriotism
is a superstition to them. So they tremble for their dear little
selves. They are the dead end of each culture, the drones of civilization.
The sooner they are eliminated, the healthier for a nation.
I AM ADOLPH HITLER,
by Adolph Hitler, Ed. by Werner/Lotte Pelz, 1971, Page 89
He depicted them as
gutless panty-waists afraid of war:
War
is the father of all things. War makes everything new. I who
had always loathed the idea of joining a group went mad with joy when I
received the communications stating that my application had been accepted.
I was a member of the German Wehrmacht.
I can already hear the surviving liberal... --and they will survive, they
will survive.-- I can hear them moan and wring their hands: "War is cruel.
War is dirty. Men get hurt, oh my, oh my! Men get killed, you
know, one shoots, ouch, ouch. Family life is broken up. Economic
life is ruined. Culture suffers."
Let me tell you this, meine
Herrn Liberalen [my gentlemen liberals]: War gives rise to love and friendship,
more than to hatred. It intensifies life. Makes it significant.
Its cruelty is incidental. Life is cruel. Death is cruel.
I AM ADOLPH HITLER,
by Adolph Hitler, Ed. by Werner/Lotte Pelz, 1971, Page 85
Man
is born to battle. Especially the masses. For battle and for
sacrifice. The old, virile religions were right here. Particularly
the Incas and Aztecs with their human sacrifices. Nothing a man desires
more than to pour out his blood that something greater and stronger than
he may become still stronger: the tribe, his fatherland, his God.
Liberals do not understand this. They come from comfortable homes
with soft music and armchairs. They have money and education.
They never had to fight. Not even for their money or their education!
They have always been protected. Hot-house products. Their
desires are weakened. Even their desire to give. They think
they can satisfy that desire to give by giving money, alms, by giving people
work, by giving them education--which means, gentlemen, by permitting them
to empty their chamber pots and by pouring something very similar to their
contents into people's heads! Liberals give by giving good advice
and encouraging others to become like themselves.
The simple man has nothing to give. But his ambition to give is much
more passionate. He wants to give himself. The liberal thinks
of giving as giving something to those below him. The simple man
longs to give everything to something above himself. In battle he
has the chance to give himself. And he has the chance to survive
his sacrifice, to grow greater with his country and his God; to become
the God who receives the sacrifice as well as the victim who is offered.
That moment is called victory. Nothing that follows after it can
equal it.
I AM ADOLPH HITLER,
by Adolph Hitler, Ed. by Werner/Lotte Pelz, 1971, Page 86
Adolph even went so
far as to claim Nazis, not liberals, were the real champions of women’s
rights:
There
was a time when liberalism was fighting for "equal rights" for women, but
the faces of German women and German girls were devoid of hope, bleak and
sad. And today? Today we see countless beaming, laughing faces.
And here again it is woman's instinct which tells her for good reason:
we can laugh once again, for the future of the Volk is guaranteed.
HITLER, [Speeches
and Proclamations], by Max Domarus, Vol. 2, page 699
And he branded economic
liberalism as anti-Christ:
For
almost 2000 years the Gospel of Christ has been preached, for 2000 years
the sense of community has been taught: love one another, care for one
another, respect and help one another! But today, at the end of these
2000 years, economic liberalism flourishes as never before.
HITLER--MEMOIRS OF
A CONFIDANT, by Otto Wegener, 1985, page 56
But in Hitler’s view
the most egregious crime of liberalism was its inadvertent, if not surreptitious,
assistance to Marxism, a view cryptically shared by virtually all American
radio talk show hosts today. In his speech delivered at the First
Congress of German Workers on 10 May 1933 Hitler said:
Bismarck once declared that Liberalism was the pace-maker for Social Democracy.
And I do not need in this place to say that social democracy is the pace-maker
for communism. But communism is the pace-maker for death--the death
of a people--downfall. We have begun the fight against communism
and we shall wage it to the end.
MY NEW ORDER by Hitler,
Edited by Raoul de Roussy de Sales, 1941, Page 169
ADOLPH HITLER QUOTATIONS,
by Karl Hammer,1990, Page 36
THE HITLER DECREES,
by James Pollock and Harlow Heneman, 1934, Page 75
In the New Year's Proclamation
for 1 January 1932:
Just
as a figure like Bismarck once rightfully described liberalism as the pacesetter
of Social Democracy, Democracy and the Center [Catholic Center Party] are
today the pacesetters of Bolshevism and thus the parties who are mainly
to blame for our misfortune.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 79
In a 5 September 1934
speech at Nuremberg:
The
world idea of the liberal era invites the international idea of Marxist
socialism as its successor, and this leads to anarchical chaos or communist
dictatorship.
ADOLPH HITLER QUOTATIONS,
by Karl Hammer,1990, Page 30
In his speech in the
Reichstag on 23 March 1933:
The
splitting up of the nation into groups with irreconcilable views, systematically
brought about by the false doctrines of Marxism, means the destruction
of the basis of a possible communal life. The disintegration attacks
all the foundations of social order. The completely irreconcilable
views of different individuals with regard to the terms State, society,
religion, morals, family, and economy give rise to differences that lead
to internecine war. Starting from the liberalism of the last century,
this development is bound by natural laws to end in communistic chaos.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 264
THE HITLER DECREES,
by James Pollock and Harlow Heneman, 1934, Page 63
Liberalism is lumped
together with hated democracy and Marxism:
My
policy only seems dangerous; it is not really so. Success will be
mine because I have fathomed the weaknesses, including Marxism, of all
the spurious great men of democracy and liberalism.
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION,
by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, page 107
In Berlin on 30 January
1937:
The
main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic
concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute
therefor the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the
bond of its common blood....
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 80
Expounding a theme
near and dear to the hearts of American Rightists, Hitler constantly accused
the press of being liberal and undermining the nation:
The
activity of the so-called liberal press was the work of gravediggers for
the German people and the German Reich. One can pass by in silence
the Marxist papers of lies; to them lying is as necessary to their life
as catching mice is to the cat; but its [the liberal press] task is only
to break the people's folkish and national spine in order to make it ripe
for the yoke of slavery....
MEIN KAMPF, Adolf
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 331
It light of the above,
it comes as no surprise that Hitler, like nearly all current American talk
show hosts, felt liberalism should be relegated to the trash heap:
We
must strike off the egg-shell of liberalism, which unconsciously we still
carry on our backs. This is difficult for many of us. We have
gathered ideas from every branch and twig by the wayside of life, and no
longer know their origin.
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION,
by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, page 37
And other nations must
be assisted in acting similarly:
If
ever there is a place where democracy is senseless and suicidal, it is
in South America. We must strengthen these people's clear conscience,
so that they may be enabled to throw both their liberalism and their democracy
overboard.
THE VOICE OF DESTRUCTION, by Hermann Rauschnigg, 1940, page 62
In fact, to go even
further, unlike American Rightist talk show hosts who are yet to be so
candid, Hitler opening admits he would like to physically eliminate liberals:
To
pour doubts into an ordinary man's mind has a similar effect to pouring
arsenic into the coffee of a liberal. Only while the one effect is
highly desirable, the other one is not.
I AM ADOLPH HITLER,
by Adolph Hitler, Ed. by Werner/Lotte Pelz, 1971, Page 90
All of this Hitlerite propaganda was quoted not in order to provide a forum for a mental illness but to expose the degree to which so much of what the Fuhrer proclaimed sounds superficially plausible and could very well be adopted in the minds of many Americans given the right, or perhaps one should say the wrong, conditions. Americans need to be fully apprised of what Hitler represented and even more aware of the fact that the ideology represented by Nazism certainly did not die in 1945. The Hitlerite mentality is just below the surface in the minds of far too many Americans and could very well surface given deleterious conditions and Rightist media control. Understanding why Nazism appealed to millions and the beliefs contained therein is very important since many people have a conception of Nazism that is decidedly at variance with reality. Simply stated, the Nazi ideology is by no means as unusual or out of the American mainstream as many have been led to believe and there are powerful forces on the American political scene who are nascent mouthpieces for that which might very well emerge. To enunciate a maxim as potent as any in physics, vigilance on the part of the American people, especially in light of the current domination by those labeled the neo-conservatives, is of first magnitude in importance.
A song sung by Hitler
throughout his entire career, one very much in line with his anti-class,
anti-Marxist ideology and Rightist credentials, is that individuals rather
than classes or groups make history. This theme, with which the Bushites
would thoroughly agree, permeates nearly all of his rhetoric and is repeated
ad nauseum.
In a speech in Essen on
23 November 1926 he stated:
World
history, like all events of historical significance, is the result of the
activity of single individuals--is not the fruit of majority decisions....
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolf Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 87
In Munich on 29 November
1929:
The
second factor is that of leadership. We say that among nations it
is not the majorities that are decisive but the evaluation attached to
the leader. It is not the sum total but genius itself. There
is nothing of lasting importance in the world which does not owe its origin
to the creative ability of the individual.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 12
In the Berlin Sportpalast
on 10 February 1933:
Thus
we want to break with all the manifestations of a rotten democracy and
place in its stead the everlasting realization that everything which is
great can originate only in the power of the individual and that everything
which is to be preserved must be entrusted once more to the ability of
the individual.
HITLER, SPEECHES AND
PROCLAMATIONS 1932-45, Vol. 1, by Max Domarus, page 248
The
first step which visibly distinguished man from the animal was that towards
invention.
MEIN KAMPF, Adolf
Hitler, New York, Reynal & Hitchcock, 1939, page 662
And this belief understandably
led him to the conclusion that individualism is superior to democracy.
In Munich on 21 November
1927 he stated:
Never
have votes and majorities added one iota to the culture of mankind.
Every accomplishment is solely the result of the work and energy of great
men, and as such, a flaming protest against the inertia of the masses.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 6
In a speech to the
Industry Club in Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932:
To
sum up the argument: I see two diametrically opposed principles: the principle
of democracy which, wherever it is allowed practical effect, is the principle
of destruction: and the principle of the authority of personality which
I would call the principle of achievement, because whatever man in the
past has achieved--all human civilizations--is conceivable only if the
supremacy of this principle is admitted.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 790
In a speech in Munich
on 12 April 1922:
And
then sixthly we grasped the fact that power in the last resort is possible
only where there is strength, and that strength lies not in the dead weight
of numbers but solely in energy. Even the smallest minority can achieve
a mighty result if it is inspired by the most fiery, the most passionate
will to act. World history has always been made by minorities.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolf Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 24
In a speech in Nuremberg
September 10, 1934 Hitler stated:
Peoples
have never yet been successfully led by a majority but always only by a
minority.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolf Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 293
The destiny of a nation
is decided by superior individual leaders according to the Fuhrer.
In Weimar on 12 April 1931:
The
national treasure of a people is its great men. The people with the
most geniuses will be the most highly endowed. The people with the
most celebrated poets, musicians, and architects will be the richest in
the field of art. The people with the greatest number of famous statesmen
and generals will not only achieve the most fame but also the greatest
good which will be won through the power of these great men. The
greatest national treasure of the people lies in the purity of its blood
and in the worth of its important men. It is, therefore, logical
that the destiny of the nation should be determined by its great men.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 13
In that Berlin speech
before workers in the Rheinmetall-Borsig Works on 10 December 1940:
On
the other hand, we National Socialists equally oppose the theory that all
men are equals. Today, when a man of genius make some astounding
invention and enormously benefits his country by his brains, we pay him
his due, for he has really accomplished something and been of use to his
country. However, we hope to make it impossible for idle drones to
inhabit this country.
MY NEW ORDER
by Adolf Hitler, Edited by de Sales, 1941, page 881
And it was his contention,
in line with that of all Rightists such as the Bushites, that Marxism destroys
individualism, although today the Bushites are declaring that it is al
Qaeda and the world’s terrorists who are playing the destructive role.
In a 26 February 1924
speech in Munich Hitler stated:
I understand Marxism to be a teaching which in principle denies the value
of personality and puts mass in place of energy.
ADOLPH HITLER QUOTATIONS,
by Karl Hammer,1990, Page 34
But
what we want is precisely to keep this destructive Bolshevism, which annihilates
culture and economy, from taking further root, so that it destroys our
life as well!
Communism results in a welfare state where the standards are averaged downward.
We want a state that allows for free development of the personality,...
HITLER--MEMOIRS OF
A CONFIDANT, by Otto Wegener, 1985, page 115
In his speech at the
Second Workers' Congress of the Labor Front on 16 May 1934:
One
cannot secure the highest achievements in economic production while one
is putting into practice a principle which from the outset deals a mortal
blow at all personal initiative.
HITLER'S SPEECHES
by Norman Baynes, 1942, VOLUME 1, Page 898
And in Munich on 25
January 1923:
Marxism
necessarily must become a movement of people who, engaged in nothing but
physical labor, do not have the ability to think clearly or as a result
of their work have become hostile to mental labor. It is a gigantic
organization of working animals without spiritual leadership. Marxism,
therefore, must become class warfare, and thereby it becomes what its founders
wanted it to be: An instrument which deprives things of their spirit, an
instrument in the service of a race striving for world domination and deadly
opposed to true socialism [Hitler’s version of socialism]. It is
the weapon needed by the Jew of the international stock exchange in order
to conquer this world. Deep are the impressions which this doctrine
has made on our people. The idea of authority has been overthrown;
freedom of action and the creative opportunities of the individual are
restricted; the genius of leadership is shackled, which paralyzes any free
development. In place of all this there is the democratic principle
of decision by the majority, which always signifies the victory of the
meaner, the more inferior, the weaker, and above all of the cowardly and
irresponsible. The individual is smothered by the masses.
HITLER'S WORDS, by
Adolf Hitler, Edited by Gordon Prange, 1944, page 219-221
The evidence suggests
that many Bushites would agree with this anti-democratic, anti-Marxist
assessment far more than they would ever care to admit publicly.
But, then, one of the redeeming features of Adolf was that by being an
open and unapologetic dictator he was far freer to express his beliefs
without fear of exposure and consequences than the Bushites of today.
The 2000 Presidential
election in which the pronounced winner received approximately one half
million votes less than the declared loser comes readily to mind as an
example of democracy subverted. If the American people are not sufficiently
alert and demanding, this may very well become a harbinger of that which
is to come. The United States is no more immune to stolen elections
and coup d’ etats than any other nation.