Whistle Blower
Statement of the Situation
A strategic planning manager for a multinational
organization, which owns and manages tea plantations in a developing country,
is facing a critical issue. An organization has been the subject of a series of
critical articles in a national paper about: the exploitative pay and
conditions on the plantations; and an arrangement has made with the country's
government for the repatriation of profits.
Coke
is an example of Whistle Blower scenario. Coke had been found to have
pesticides in their products. However, they issued advertising along with many
other methods to deny the fact.
Background of the
Situation
A strategic planning manager for a multinational
organization, which owns and manages tea plantations in a developing country,
is facing a critical time. While the organization's advertising emphasizes the
organization's 'partnership with the developing world', it has been the subject
of a series of critical articles in a national paper about the exploitative pay
and conditions on the plantations and for the repatriation of profits with the
government. The information is accurate; and it is being supplied by a member
of an organization. An organization has a rule that a member of staff “must not
disclose commercial information to unauthorized persons” and another one, which
says that “all contacts with the press must be handled by the properly
authorized officers of the organization.”
A member of your department inadvertently makes it
plain that it is she, who has been supplying the information to the newspaper.
She immediately recognizes what she has done and says, “that you 'must ignore
what I've said or I'll be sacked”.
Coke
had been found to have pesticides in their products. The test results found high concentrations
of pesticides and insecticides, including lindane, DDT, malathion
and chlorpyrifos, in the colas, making them unfit for consumption. Coca-Cola
Issues to be Resolved
The issues are the Corporate Ethics on communicating with
Media by the employee and Social Responsibility of corporations, and Coca-Cola
in
Procedures Employed
According to the organization rule, an employee has violated it. However, her action is necessary because she did ring a bell about corporation practice. The corporation practice is absolutely unethical and lack of social responsibilities. A member who did supply the information should be appreciated rather than being punished. Even the articles has tarnished the corporation image, however, the image can be rebuilt with the right and corrective actions like improving pay and working condition, running an ethical business and being more socially responsible.
For Coca-Cola in
Outcomes
As a responsible and ethical corporation, the company should handle the root of problem like create a great and friendly working environment, conducting necessary action to enhance ethical behaviors as well as whistle blowing actions. Any harmful or unethical actions shall be brought to the public to prevent in the future.
Summary of Case
A member of an organization bravely blew a whistle about her
organization practice of exploitative pay and working condition as well as repatriation of profits to the
government. Even it is against the organization rule, but it is very necessary
and it is a corrective action to do.
Coca-Cola
in
Principles of Practice Demonstrated
The ethical behaviors are valued and preserved. Any whistle blowing actions are encouraged to keep the organization being socially responsible and preserving ethics and values.
Identify the Competencies Demonstrated
A member who supplied the information is truly a valuable leader, who honors ethics and social responsibilities. She was so brave to blow a whistle even she knew she would face many tough consequences.