Author: Rising Sun
E-mail: jagrslc@yahoo.com
The FF of Rising Sun is archived at: http://www.geocities.com/jagrslc
For updates on FF by Rising Sun join:
jagrslc-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Rated: PG-13
Classification:
vignette
Summary: The
case of LaMott v the Judge
Advocate General of the Unites States Navy
Spoiler: NONE
Disclaimer: First
Monday and JAG characters portrayed belong to Donald P. Bellisario, CBS and
Paramount Television. No copyright infringement intended. All other characters depicted are purely
fictional and any similarities to actual people are purely coincidental.
Author’s Notes:
Part one of a cross over story arc that includes:
All available at http://www.geocities.com/jagrslc/cross_over/cross_story/onefftoc.htm
In case you print this you may vote at http://www.geocities.com/jagrslc/cross_over/cross_story/justice.htm
Feedback: This is a little different to the usual FF so I am really interested in readers thoughts.
Story Written February
22, 2002
Citation: 531 U.S. 98 (2010)
Docket # 347-2010/1407
Dates: Argued on July 14, 2010
Decided on July 15, 2010
Advocate: Colonel Sarah Mackenzie, Unites States Marine Corps, argued the
cause for petitioner the Judge Advocate General of the Unites States Navy.
Following the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces decision in LaMott v the Judge Advocate General of the Unites States Navy. The Judge Advocate General filed a request for review by the US Supreme Court.
1 – Is the reason that attempted murder is not regarded equally with murder because something has happened to interrupt the intent from being completed?
2 - Is an extension of the Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 43 – Statutes of Limitations from that of five years to that of infinity violate the Due Process Clauses of the Constitution?
You be a US Supreme Court Justice and
decide by registering your vote.