Date: Tue Oct 19 19:52:35 1999 From: weavert@PRIMENET.COM ("T. Weaver") Subject: Fwd: Oct. 20 column -- women need guns To: AZRKBA@asu.edu

Here is a message we need to get out to people....guns save lives!!

>Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:08:08 -0600
>X-Sender: vin@dali.lvrj.com
>Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:01:32 -0700
>To: vinsends@ezlink.com
>From: Vin_Suprynowicz@lvrj.com (Vin Suprynowicz)
>Subject: Oct. 20 column -- women need guns
>Resent-From: vinsends@ezlink.com
>X-Mailing-List: <vinsends@ezlink.com> archive/latest/753
>X-Loop: vinsends@ezlink.com
>Resent-Sender: vinsends-request@ezlink.com
>
>
>     FROM MOUNTAIN MEDIA
>     FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATED OCT. 20, 1999
>     THE LIBERTARIAN, By Vin Suprynowicz
>     Give these women guns
>
>
>     The newspapers reported Donna Hernandez of Las Vegas did everything she
>could to protect herself. Fearing that her estranged husband was going to
>kill her, she repeatedly informed the police that she feared for her life.
>She even went to court and got protection orders.
>
>   Seven of them.
>
>   It didn't help. Two weeks ago, Donna Hernandez was found stabbed and
>strangled in her home. Her ex-husband is now in jail, facing murder
>charges.
>
>   About a third of all slayings in the Las Vegas Metro police jurisdiction
>stem from domestic violence. In October of 1997, 17-year-old Maureen
>McConaha obtained a protective order against her ex-boyfriend. Weeks later,
>she was shot to death. The ex-boyfriend, Johnny Walker, is awaiting rial
>on murder charges.
>
>   In January of 1998, police found Judy and Ronnie Norman dead inside the
>couple's Las Vegas home. Next to their bodies police found a protective
>order that Judy Norman had taken out against her husband. Police ruled the
>deaths a murder-suicide.
>
>   In October of last year, Brenda Denise James was shot to death in front
>of her six children, days after she applied for and received a protective
>order against her ex-boyfriend, Robert Lee Carter, 30. A murder charge
>against Carter is pending.
>
>   While court-issued protective orders are "a good tool for law
>enforcement, they don't stop a bullet or knife, and we need to make sure
>everyone knows  that," offers Clark County Domestic Violence Commissioner
>Patricia Doninger.
>
>   "We have to find a better way to protect people like Donna Hernandez,"
>says a frustrated District Judge Nancy Saitta.
>
>   But that better way has long been available. God may have made women, but
>Colonel Colt made women equal, and carrying the tool he invented remains
>the constitutional right of every American.
>
>   The problem is, so far as can be determined, Donna Hernandez, Maureen
>McConaha, and Brenda Denise James did (start ital)not(end ital) do
>everything they could to protect themselves and their children: They did
>not buy and carry handguns, and acquire the skill to use them.
>
>   Police cannot provide an armed bodyguard for every woman who's been
>threatened. Therefore, police should actively recommend that such women
>acquire appropriate, effective weapons for self-defense, and the minimal
>training necessary to handle them safely.
>
>   In fact, if any arbitrary "background check" or "concealed-carry permit"
>paperwork delays stand in the way of a woman who holds such a valid
>"protection order" and wishes to acquire a handgun, our state lawmakers --
>and particularly U.S. Rep. Shelley Berkley, a proponent of women's rights
>and an avowed supporter of the Second Amendment -- should immediately
>introduce legislation to provide for aninstant waiver of any such waiting
>periods or bureaucratic delays, authorizing the immediate, legal placement
>of a handgun in any such woman's purse.
>
>   Those with an irrational phobia of firearms -- though they would never
>propose that we send our boys to Bosnia armed with nothing more than a
>whistle on a key ring -- will whine that "A woman is in greater danger if
>she has a gun; the assailant will just take it away and use it on her."
>
>   In fact, Gary Kleck, professor of criminology at Florida State University
>in Tallahassee, examined the statistical evidence for that concern in his
>book, "Targeting Guns."
>
>   Guns are taken away from their owner and used by an assailant in fewer
>than 1 percent of defensive handgun uses, Professor Kleck determined. Nor
>is there any indication that more widespread gun ownership would turn our
>neighborhoods into "shooting galleries": Dr. Kleck also found that in more
>than 90 percent of defensive handgun uses, the weapon isn't even fired.
>
>   "It's one of the great lies of the anti-gun people, that people are so
>incompetent that they're going to have their guns taken away from them,"
>says David Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute in
>Golden, Colo. and author of the book "Guns: Who Should Have Them?"
>
>   In fact, if the authorities would send out a notice that the victim is
>now armed, along with the court "keep-away" order, most of these attacks
>might never occur, at all.
>
>   "There's very strong evidence that knowledge that victimshave guns is a
>great deterrent to attacking," adds Don Kates, a criminologist with the
>Pacific Research Institute in California. "The National Institute of
>Justice has sponsored extensive surveys of criminals in prisons, and ...
>they attest that they were far less likely to commit crimes against people
>when they knew that they were likely to be armed.
>
>   "The other thing is, it is universally reported that women respond much
>better to firearms training than men do, because the problem with men is
that their testosterone levels get in the way," Mr. Kates explains.
>"They're supposed to already know about guns, and so you have to get them
>to unlearn things that they know that are wrong, and they're very stubborn
>about that."
>
>   So, if at-risk women find it easy to learn to use guns safely and
>effectively, why aren't they all urged by authorities to go out and get
>themselves a Smith & Wesson?
>
>   "That's to admit that the whole system is a complete failure," explains
>criminologist Kates. "Noticethat the whole thing with restraining orders
>is a failure designed to remedy a failure. We already have laws against
>violence, so why do we need restraining orders? Because police won't
>enforce laws against violence within the family."
>
>   October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month, a time when our political
>leaders annually call on us to reflect on the number of domestic-violence
>incidents that occur each year, and to take action to stop them.
>
>   OK then. Let's stop mooning and moaning. Let's o something that works.
>
>   It's not big, sturdy men who fear to be the last person leaving the
>shopping mall late at night, walking across that darkened parking lot. It's
>America's women.
>
>   Let's really reduce violence against our womenfolk. Let's give them guns.
>
>
>Vin Suprynowicz is the assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas
>Review-Journal. His new book, "Send in the Waco Killers," is available at
>1-800-244-2224, or via web site
>http://www.thespiritof76.com/wacokillers.html.
>
>***
>
>
>
>
>Vin Suprynowicz,   vin@lvrj.com
>
>"The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -- John
>Hay, 1872
>
>"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and
>thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series
>of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken
>
>* * *

Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Visit my atheist friends at Arizona Secular Humanists
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!
1