![]() Main Menu Links Bulletin Board Contact Us |
May
28, 2006 Cawson
St. Church of Christ Mural
Worthey Elements of
Conversion Introduction Recently we
discussed the conversion of Saul of Tarsus.
Two things stand out about his conversion concerning who he was. Saul was not a prodigal who lived his life
wastefully in sin. Neither was he a
mainline Jew responding to the Messiah.
Saul was a Pharisee who could not see his need for the promised Messiah. It should have been a natural process for
Jews to accept the Messiah when he came.
Thousands did just that. But Saul
was a Pharisee. His conversion was even
the more remarkable for that reason. We
also noted his own personal commitment to keeping a good conscience before God
before and after his conversion. (Acts
23:1; 24:16; 26:9.) Saul did not have a
guilty conscience until he understood what a mistake he had made concerning the
Christ. Then, he faced his own
sinfulness in the flesh and mistake in rejecting the Savior. ( I want to
discuss today some other conversions in the Bible that are different from
Saul’s, and then to draw some conclusions about our own. Jews Looking for the Messiah (John 1 & Matt 4) The early
chapters in the Gospel accounts record Jesus calling disciples to come and
follow Him. Andrew and Peter, James and
John, Philip and Nathaniel were among the first to follow Jesus. It is obvious that these Jews were not among
the Pharisees. They were looking for the
Messiah. Andrew said to Peter, “We have
found the Messiah, which is being interpreted, the Christ.” (John 1:41.)
Philip said to Nathaniel, “We have found him of whom Moses in the law
and the prophets did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.” (John 1:45.) John the
Baptist had prepared the way for the Messiah by his teaching and reminding the
Jews about the prophecies concerning the Christ and the time of this
arrival. It was to occur according to
Daniel in the days of the fourth empire from This is the
way that it was supposed to have occurred.
The storm of Saul’s conversion was not what God had planned. The failures theologically of the Pharisees
caused that problem. “Jesus came unto
his own and his own received him not,” was not the plan of God. (1:11.) Were their
conversions really that easy? John just
gave them a refresher course in OT theology, pointed out the Messiah to them,
and they followed them. No, real
conversions are never really that easy.
It is always easier to convince people than it is to convert them. Several years later and just before the
cross, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “When thou are converted, strengthen the
brethren.” (Luke 22:32.) Jesus called James and John, boanerges, or sons of thunder. (Mark 3:17.)
These two disciples wanted Jesus to burn up a Samaritan village, but
Jesus rebuked them. (Luke 9:52-56.) What can we
learn from the conversions of the mainline Jews who were looking for the
Messiah? They did not have the same
dramatic experience that Saul did, but they nevertheless had sinful fallen
inclinations that needed to be put to death.
Putting the flesh to death is never an easy matter. Conversion is not easy; baptizing someone is
easy. Repentance is difficult and never
complete; we must die daily. Due to our
sinful nature, everyone wrestles with some problem in the flesh. It is pride, lust or covetousness. It is a boisterous, vengeful spirit desiring
to destroy others, like James or John. For
some it is a lack of faith and commitment; weakness instead of wickedness
(according to Dietrich Bonhoffer). Conversion of Gentiles
(Acts 10) The
conversion of Cornelius and his family has always been a topic of great
interest to Bible students. He was a
military man, a centurion of the Italian band.
Just that description alone might cause you to stop and not approach
Cornelius. He had to be tough to be a
commander in the Roman army, the most powerful military force in that day. But the conversion of Saul and Cornelius
ought to teach us that present religious beliefs or occupations do not
necessarily mean that they are opposed to God and his will. It depends upon the kind of heart that is under
the uniform and the conscience that the religious person possesses. Are they, are we, honest? Do we really seek after God’s will? Those are the right considerations. We remember
that Cornelius was a religious man who worshipped God, gave much alms to the
people, and guided his whole house in spiritual devotion. God heard his prayers and sent a messenger,
Simon Peter, to teach him about the Christ. Cornelius
was not a prodigal. He was not a
Pharisee; neither was he a pagan worshipping false gods. Of what did his conversion consist? It consisted of a great need, as is the case
in all conversions, of the knowledge of the Savior and our explicit trust in
Him. It surely included relief at
finally understanding how a person is saved, how guilt is removed, and
assurance of salvation. Cornelius was
not accustomed to offering animal sacrifices as were Jews. He probably did not understand his great need
for a sin-offering or atonement for sin.
Cornelius probably had the least number of stumbling blocks in his way
to Christ. The feminine
counterpart to Cornelius is As The Prodigal & Elder Brother (Luke 15:11-32.) In one
powerful story, Jesus told two accounts about conversion. He told about a father which had two
sons. One was a prodigal, which means
wasteful. He wasted his inheritance with
reckless, riotous living. He dishonored
his father, more than we will ever understand in the West. When a severe famine came, he began to be in
need and was hungry. If you live in sin
long enough after awhile a famine is going to hit. The party will soon be over. Sin will destroy you. The “fun” will last only for a little
while. Then, there are bills to pay. There are
many commendable things about this young man.
1) He did not sneak around and do wrong.
He asked his father for his part of the money; his father gave it to
him. There was an openness and transparency about him that is good. 2) When he was in trouble and hungry, he came
to himself. (Luke 15:17.) Some people never do. They just keep on hurting and dying as if
everything is alright. 3) He was
humble. He said, “Father, I have sinned
against heaven and before you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son;
just make me a hired servant.”
(15:18-19.) How few there are who
will humbly say these things. 4) He
accepted his father’s embrace and place at home again. It takes a great person to return and accept
grace as the means of his position with the Father. Most want to work their way back; just make
me a hired servant. The
description of the elder brother is that of a Pharisee. He never did anything that was wrong; except
his heart was wrong. He pouted because
the father was so loving to receive his brother back without any penance and
penalty. He would not come in and
celebrate. A self-righteous person is
usually without joy, and wants others to be like him. The story ends with the conversion of the
prodigal, but with no conversion of the elder brother. There are not many commendable things about
the older brother. The story is really
about him. The beginning of Luke 15 sets
the context for the three stories that follow. Conclusion There are
many accounts of conversion in the Bible, but there are likewise many accounts
of non-conversion. Most people who heard
Jesus and the apostles were not converted.
They remained lost in sin and rebellion against God. Where are you today? |