![]() ![]() ![]() "A wind that blows from the abyss above us among our brethren who one time existed ripples and shakes the surface of our spirits, and, reflected upon this trembling mirror, the world, too, trembles." --Miguel de Unamuno (1920) [...] MERCILESS Who comes After the subject?, The old canard, The quintessential Question mark ... And what comes First, and, then, Who comes after, Or what comes Before what comes After the Event, The moment, the Majestic, the Je ne sais quoi -- But that which is, And that which was, And that that will Be again, when What was not is Not to be, Nor will be ever Seen again ... And it is not For words that such Is meant to find Its place in thought, Because what’s there Is not for ‘now’, Nor is it for The moment lost ... That is its truth, Its character, Its method and Its ‘coming to’, Its loss of innocence, Its mark, its Coming to itself, Its far and able Nimble pace, The torment after Which its taste Is not so bitter As it’s sweet ... Fermented grapes Its voice may speak, Dionysos, Ariadne, Mystery and paradox, Theseus and Monstrous art, Is not nor will Exact this mark; The Merciless, Miraculous, the Antidote, antithesis, The ‘What’ is Never found ... GK (DRAFT 07/21/07) NOTES - ‘The Merciless’ = The dialectic = The not-not-rational, but not the irrational (not-rational) nor the rational (not-irrational), but what is behind the complex (beyond negations, the ‘negation of negation’), or what in the Gita is called the ‘eternally embodied one’, Nietzsche’s ‘Yes, Yes’ (double affirmation) ... Therefore, to give up all ‘yoga(s)’, to defend the archaic that only ever arrives as ‘futural’ (never arrives) ... Or, that which the Jena Romantics circled endlessly (especially Novalis), and that which Wilhelm von Humboldt found (‘Brahman’) in his humble defense of August Wilhelm von Schlegel’s Latin translation of the Gita (1823) ... Thus, negation upon negation until Some-thing Else ‘appears’ ... "This self-contained essence may indeed also be represented as self-sufficient, in the way that Brahman's self-thinking. Brahman is the universal soul; in creating, it goes forth out of itself as a breath, it contemplates itself, and from then on it is for itself." G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion (1831) ... See Bradley L. Herling, The German Gita: Hermeneutics and Discipline in the German Reception of Indian Thought, 1778-1831 (London: Routledge, 2005) Coda / The True (Soma) ![]() RECYCLED POSTSCRIPT(S) / BIBLIOGRAPHIE / UPDATES VELAZQUEZ - "It is perhaps the very greatest tour de force of western painting. In subject and execution, it is as the French philosopher Michel Foucault wrote in 1966, the representation of representation." Dawson W. Carr, "Painting and Reality: The Art and Life of Velázquez" [pp. 26-53], Dawson W. Carr, et alia, Velázquez (London: National Gallery of Art, 2006), p. 48 / See Estrella de Diego, "Representing Representation: Reading 'Las Meninas', Again" [pp. 150-169], in Suzanne L. Stratton-Pruitt (ed.), Velázquez’s 'Las Meninas' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) ... TRUTH - "Truth is found behind appearances. And what is behind appearances is a great darkness. And it is that darkness that one will have to search for the truth." John Berger, "Los enanos cambian de sitio", in El retrato en el Museo del Prado (Madrid: Anaya, 1994), pp. 376-377, in Suzanne L. Stratton-Pruitt, "Velázquez’s ‘Las Meninas’" [pp. 124-149], in Suzanne L. Stratton-Pruitt (ed.), Ibid., p. 149 (trans. Suzanne L. Stratton-Pruitt) ... See Nightfall ... The (Ir)Real Thing (Looking Awry) ... ![]() ![]() The Editors ![]() |
/S/O(MA) / LANY - 2007