Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 06:32:42 -0000
From: fractor@swlink.net
Subject: [lpaz-discuss] John Wilde's Response to "Status"
To: lpaz-discuss@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-discuss@yahoogroups.com

John, I disagree 100%

In my mind, there is never a dichotomy or divergence between what's fair and what's just.

You claim that the ALP can not compromise, even if to do so would be "fair". I don't agree that doing the fair thing - the just thing - is a compromise at all. Or maybe what I heard was that if the ALP is threatened by potential law suits, then it's okay to be "unfair".

But isn't that the argument of those in ALP, Inc. or LPUS - that if we're threatened (by not being able to be more successful), it's okay to compromise?

Well, of course, your way out of it is to merely proclaim that whatever course of action you choose is the only way that doesn't involve compromise of our principles - regardless of the fairness of the results.

But then, your argument is that you have ath


Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Check out Atheists United - Arizona
Visit my atheist friends at Heritics, Atheists, Skeptics, Humanists, Infidels, and Secular Humanists - Arizona
Arizona Secular Humanists
Paul Putz Cooks the Arizona Secular Humanist's Check Book
News about crimes commited by the police and government
News about crimes commited by religious leaders and beleivers
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!
Libertarians talk about freedom
1