Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 23:04:53 -0700 From: pls@thekeep.com (Paul Schauble) Subject: Re: [lpaz-Pima] The ALP 2001 Convention: The good, the bad, and the ugly To: lpaz-Pima@yahoogroups.com, lpaz-discuss@onelist.com (lpaz-discuss) Reply-To: lpaz-Pima@yahoogroups.com
>There were no objections to the handling of my removal from the ALP GovCom for
>the crime of being elected to ALP, Inc. Ernie Hancock summed up the feelings of
>the delegates, "it was short, sweet, and hard to beat". No need to take time or
>muddy the waters with inconvenient things like fact-finding, requiring proof of
>wrong-doing, or allowing the accused to formally present his case.
Excellent report, Jason. This paragraph is the only thing I have a comment on.
We all know that the issue you want fact finding on is your claim that ALP, Inc. is not a political party. To be blunt, Jason, no one else in the ALP buys that, and it has been argued and voted on twice now.
like your report, this note is going to lpaz-Pima also. I'm curious how many of the Pima people will agree that (whatever the name), the entity that Peter is chair if is not a political party. Anyone?
++PLS
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: lpaz-pima-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/