Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:43:03 -0800
From: auvenj@mailcity.com ("Jason Auvenshine")
Subject: [lpaz-xcom] Re: Fw: (no subject)
To: lpaz-xcom@eGroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-xcom@eGroups.com
Ernie,
This is rich. I had a very short conversation with Peter today where
he expressed great consternation over the fact that ALP would even
consider placing someone other than the nominee of the LNC on the AZ
presidential ballot. Be assured he's going to be looking real hard,
starting now, for a way out of this one...
"ernest hancock" <ernesthancoc-@inficad.com> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/lpaz-xcom/?start=1010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bergland <dpbergland@earthlink.net>
> To: Ernest Hancock <ernesthancock@inficad.com>
> Cc: SteveDasbach@compuserve.com <SteveDasbach@compuserve.com>
> Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 10:12 AM
> Subject: Re: (no subject)
<snip>
> >Of course, my greatest concern is for the health of the Party in
Arizona
> >and how what's going on there might affect ballot status for the LP
> >presidential ticket and other candidates. I'd like to know your
views
> >on that question. I do assume that you don't want to do anything to
> >jeopardize ballot position. So please let me know if there is any
> >reason for concern and, if so, what might be done about it.
> >
> >David Bergland
You might want to send Mr. Bergland a copy of the resolution that was
passed regarding who ALP will place on the ballot, and then ask HIM if
he thinks "there is any reason for concern and, if so, what might be
done about it." Duh. If there isn't some resolution to this feud my
impression is there's going to be a big reason for concern.
--Jason Auvenshine