Home.    Parts.    Specs.    Gallery.    Mumbo Jumbo
 
Updates

Update 10/11/03

Apparently some pics of the upcoming Mustang have leaked onto the net. The story goes that some Ford bonk snapped the pictures and published them, then got canned for doing so. Now I've heard about 97,000 stories exactly like this over subjects ranging from cars to computer games, so I really don't believe it. But the pictures are real, and besides the obvious aspects, they're not Photochopped.

I'm going to open with how utterly disappointed I am in these pictures. They're obviously "production" models, with all the concept niceties that adorned the Detroit Auto Show model MIA.

Some of the parts that are missing were expected. The ram-air hood is gone. I'm happy it's gone, because I was afraid they would tack on fake air ducts like on the current Mustang... which I hate. (The air ducts, not the Mustang.)

I initially didn't like the Mustang when I saw it. I believe it's because I had built up so much anticipation for a new and futuristic design beforehand. Instead I got an old and futuristic design, if that's possible. At least they got 1 out of 2, that's more than most Ford vehicles lately.

Even with my poor first impressions, I loved the rear end of the concept. The rest of the car be damned, for I loved the overhanging trunk lid and full width tail lights. I had heard a rumor that Ford was changing the rear end. I hoped OH so hard that they didn't... it looks like they did. Now the rear end looks like a boxier version of the current Mustang, which is a BAD thing.

The interior has also gone to shit. What'd they do? Steal it out of an F-150? You think they could have managed an interior at least close to the concept, but no. No, they didn't. It looks like a minor upgrade from the current Mustang, which has a very nice interior.

At the beginning of this project, Design Chief Jay Mays said that the Camaro died because it lost contact with it's roots. Mustang is losing contact with it's roots. Well mr Mays, I'm sorry... You're wrong. The Camaro failed because it was a shitty car. It had an inefficient engine, barbaric interior, and overdrawn, bulbous exterior lines.

The Mustang isn't shit. The new Mustang isn't shit. But I hate to see penny's being pinched when they're trying to sell an icon.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the new, 2005 Mustang! A few things of note in these shots. the side scoop doesn't appear to exist, I think it's just a notch. the rear end has been butchered. The Exhaust ports through the bumper are understandable gone. The car rides an easy inch and a half higher. The glass roof is gone, and the b-pillars window is now a real window instead of a weird sheet of metal. It's also on current Mustang GT wheels.

 
     
My bane, the new rear end. The ail lights look like they're right off a current Mustang. The sexy lines wrapping around the bumper as the exhaust poked out of two holes are gone.
 
     
I like this new shot the best. While I'm still pissed about the side scoops being fake again, which I think are silly. The wheels are obviously stock wheels off a current GT, but they fill out the car nicely. If you look at the wheel wells, you'll notice that the hood line is very, very high in this model in comparison to the concept. The overly protruded wheel wells also don't exist anymore, which is bad. They were a nice spot on the concept.  
     
The front is totally different. The front bumper from the concept, and it's split corner lamps, are gone. In their place are small corner slits, and homage to the late 60's Mustang with driving lamps in the grille. They made the grille sides vertical instead of slanted: another mistake. The overly look of this version is less refined, and more cluttered. Far inferior to the concept.
 
     
Here's the shitty interior. The dash is expansive and blank of any character. The center control panel is cluttered, and the boxiness of it's overall design looks like an 80's Mustang.
 
     
More shots of the shitty interior. This one shows standard seats, and center console that seems to be inferior to the current Mustang's. The back seat appears more spacious that previous 'Stangs, that might be an optical illusion though. The doors are uninspired and inferior to current 'Stang doors as well.
 
     

The instrument cluster is cool, but stupid. There's a very good reason we don't use instrument designs from the 60's anymore.. because they sucked. The steering wheel is a pussified version of the concepts.

 
     
 

All in all, it's a depressing state of affairs with the new Mustang. The rabid excitement that had built up in me after seeing the concept and is completely gone, and I mean completely. The car is higher, taller, bulkier, and one fourth as sexy as the concept. It actually seems like it's riding on a completely different platform. If this is what Ford's "revolutionary" new Mustang looks like, fuck it. I'll buy a used 99, or a Nissan 350Z. At least that car still looks kick ass.

Well that's my two cents. I hope Ford pays attention, because I know how much unsecured debt it has. It can't afford to produce a lackluster vehicle and that's what this is. In a world of RX-8's 350Z's, and and the upcoming Supra successor, this Mustang isn't being given much of a chance.

 
     

The grille is very "Ferrari" and a welcome sight on an overall car that certainly isn't. The bulging wheel wells topped with an edge that looks sharp enough to carve meat is over done and looks like it should be a styling cue on a much older car. The obvious references to past sports cars reminds me of the new Ford GT. The overall front impression is low, mean, and Ferrari-ish, but the front is bulky, pointless, graceful as buffalo, and a sad shadow of other, well designed sports cars that this car is obviously trying to copy.

The side looks "ok." the wind wells coming off the front wheels look like thay stole the side paneling off an old Corvette... and bolted it onto the side of a new Corvette. The taillights appear to be ripped off the Enzo, but the curving tail is very Italian. the bulk of the rear section, though, looks like a fatter Mustang Fastback. The outside of the cabin is elegant and well designed, which only makes the parts of the car that are shit stand out further.
The interior is the saving grace of the car. As with the current crop of Bimmers. I'm sure the in-car dynamics will also be like driving sex, but that's beyond the point. The doors are curvy and mold into the dash lines when closed very beautifully. The over-all looks reminds me of Robin Williams' Andrew Martin in robot form from Bicentennial Man, and that's anot a bad thing. The machine-like curves, the edges are all gorgeous. The drivetrain hump is so curvy and beautiful it reminds me of a lissom woman. All in all, whoever designed the interior should get a raise, whoever the exterior, should be fired.

 

UPDATE: 5/31/03

Well I just finished up my runs at local auto shows and reading up on the biggies at my favorite car site Edmunds.com.My general impressions of the future auto industry are good, but certain aspects of it make me either want to laugh or cry, sometimes I can't tell which.

----> More

UPDATE: 3/11/03

New update about the safety of the ol' B2. This one comes compliments of Global Auto Systems.

Controversy over the Bronco II: company accused by environmental group of having paid off an expert witness in a personal-injury lawsuit in the 1990s


Ford is being accused by an environmental group of paying off an expert witness in a trial that questioned the safety of the Bronco II back in the 1990s. "It is time to make truth Job One," says Heather White, general counsel for the Environmental Working Group, which alleges Ford paid engineer David Bickerstaff $5 million. In exchange, the group says, Bickerstaff complied with Ford's request to testify that rollover rates of the Bronco II were not worse than those for comparable vehicles, which the group says is not true. The Environmental Working Group is now asking NHTSA to reopen a long-closed investigation into safety of the SUV.

The environmental organization says these strong allegations come from its research into court documents in lawsuits filed in the 1990s. One such lawsuit, filed in 2001, saw a former Bronco II owner accusing Ford of conspiracy to hide safety evidence on the vehicle. In that case, a U.S. District Court judge in West Virginia ruled that Ford had conspired with Bickerstaff to commit fraud, and the automaker settled out of court. However, a Ford spokesman told the Detroit News that Ford has faced and won all other lawsuits related to the conspiracy charge, which he said totaled five.

 

 

 

All the crap on this page is copyright © Aaron Martin- Colby. Except for the pictures... I stole those.
e-mail me at alphamc@bellatlantic.net

 

1