Slashdot | "War On Terror" Board Game Confiscated In UK
Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Slashdot
Search
News for nerds, stuff that matters
Log In
Create Account
Help
Subscribe
Firehose
Why Log In?
Why Subscribe?
Log In Nickname Password Public Terminal
[ Create a new account ]
Sections
Main
Games
Help
FAQ
Bugs
Stories
Old Stories
Old Polls
Topics
Hall of Fame
Bookmarks
Submit Story
About
Supporters
Code
Services
Jobs
Special Offers
Sponsor Solutions
Jobs
Slashdot Log In
Log In Nickname Password Public Terminal
[ Create a new account ]
"War On Terror" Board Game Confiscated In UK
Posted by kdawson on Fri Aug 15, 2008 01:19 Mario Brothers Allstars Game Tips PM
from the security-theater-as-low-comedy dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The board game The War On Terror is a satirical game in which George Bush's 'Axis of Evil' is reduced to a spinner in the middle of the board, which determines which player is designated a terrorist state. That person then has to wear a balaclava (included in the box set) with the word 'Evil' stitched onto it. Kent police said they had confiscated the game because the balaclava 'could be used to conceal someone's identity or could be used in the course of a criminal act.' Balaclavas are freely sold all over the place in the area." Schneier has blogged this stupidity, of course.
[+] security, humor, politics, streisandeffect, censorship (tagging beta)
Related Stories
Firehose:War On Terror Board Game declared criminal in UK by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
"War On Terror" Board Game Confiscated In UK More | free world of warcraft game card Login
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.
"War On Terror" Board Game Confiscated In UK 50 Comments More | Login /
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
More | Login
Please Log In to Continue
Log In Nickname Password Public Terminal
[ Create a new account ]
Loading... please wait.
Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by mlwmohawk (801821) on Friday August 15, @01:22PM (#24617849)
All too often Police confuse "fighting crime" and "protecting the peace" with authoritarian "because I said so and I have game crazy at hollywood video a gun" mentality.
I refrain from a rant, but Gamespot Pro Streets Game Guides the more police I meet, the more I hate the police.
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by Bryansix (761547) on Friday August 15, @01:24PM (#24617901) Homepage
I agree with you there. Sometimes Police take matters in their own hands when they should be busy enforcing the actual laws on the books. In addition many new game reviews police just act above the law when off duty simply because they are police during the day. Really the police should be policed more rigorously then the general public.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by Atheil (1184445) on Friday August 15, @01:55PM (#24618449)
I don't disagree with this, they should be policed more rigorously than the general public, and they usually are. If a cop comes under investigation for a crime, it is a lot more likely to make it to Court than if it is a private citizen, at least in Canada anyways. The best solution to this problem is to allocate more money to police budget so that you have more people wanting to become police officers (since now you'll have an actual benefit to the drinking card game kings amount of work they have to do) and can be pickier with who you choose.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 15, @02:39PM (#24619281)
In Canada recently a women's car was hit from behind by an off-duty cop in the wee hours of the morning, after being pulled over by an on duty cop.
The off duty cop was returning from a cop party, he was not given a sobriety test and all the cops who were asked to testify as to his soberness declared that they could not recall.
This is just one example fun game from many.
I totally distrust the police. The only attitude to take is us vs them. We are expected to testify against offenders but the police will *never* testify against their own.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Friday August 15, @03:24PM (#24619943)
I don't disagree with this, they should be policed more rigorously than the general public, and they usually are. If a cop comes under investigation for a crime, it is a lot more likely to make it to Court than if it is a private citizen, at least in Canada anyways.
Wow, that is certainly not the case in the US. In my state we actually have special exemptions in our handgun laws for police officers because normal people convicted of domestic violence are not allowed to carry concealed pistols... but so many police officers have such a conviction, they made sure to exempt them. My brother used to be a cop. When pulled over for excessive speeding, the police saw he was a cop, chatted a bit, and let him go with no mention of the speeding, not even a warning. I suppose a lot of that falls under the category of police not being investigated when they are likely suspects in crimes, but in general the police are not policed well in the US.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by k1e0x (1040314) on Friday August 15, @03:55PM (#24620399) Homepage
I don't disagree with this, they should be policed more rigorously than the general public, and they usually are. If a cop comes under investigation for a crime, it is a lot more likely to make it to Court than if it is a private citizen, at least in Canada anyways. The best solution to this problem is to allocate more money to police budget so that you have more people wanting to become police officers (since now you'll have an actual benefit to the amount of work they have to do) and can be pickier with who you choose.
Are you kidding me? You want to pay them MORE?? Are you insane?
Here is what happens.
1. Cops do something terrible. (Tazer a man to death, shoot an unarmed man at point blank range, raid the wrong house and shoot grandma, dump a quadriplegic out of his wheelchair, etc.)
2. The police department starts an official investigation.
3. The officers are suspended with pay. This is in effect a paid vacation.
4. After several months the department concludes that no wrong doing took place.
5. Police officers involved in the incident return to work, and sometimes are even promoted.
I can cite case after case after case of this happening.. search google for "police cleared of wrong doing" .. it will make you sick.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 15, @02:49PM (#24619419)
I'm curious how closely you've dealt with the Military. I used to work loss prevention for AAFES and I've gotten a pretty good glimpse into Military Justice. I'd say that if anything the majority of the time the Military is harder on their people than civilians. On top of all the punishments that come at a soldier from civilian court they face further discipline up to and including loss of their career for their actions.
If crimes are committed on post they may be relegated to the command to handle and commanders can issue punishments including loss of rank, loss of pay, confinement and separation from the military. If the crimes occur off post the civilian courts get first crack followed by the commanders.
I have to disagree that it's likely to be dismissed out of hand.
Thanks
Eric
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by jacquesm (154384) <{j} {at} {ww.com}> on Friday August 15, @03:26PM (#24619971) Homepage
Well, this is going to be based on what I can glean from the news, so it's biased at best, but just about all the cases involving the military that I can remember were pretty hard on the lower echelons but the people higher up almost always escaped real punishment.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by swb (14022) <mobocracy@gmail.com> on Friday August 15, @04:02PM (#24620507)
As a gun enthusiast myself and someone acquainted with a fair number of police officers, I will tell you that the average police officer doesn't have all that much interest in guns, either. Most cops shoot just enough to qualify (which doesn't involve much!) and don't know much about guns at all, including their own service weapons.
Generally speaking, though, you're right -- police officers tend to be blue collar (or light-blue-collar junior college types) and not terribly interested in making subtle distinctions.
But at the same time, having done ride-alongs and gotten to know some of them well enough, its easy to see why. There is a certain percentage of the guy game the population willing to believe that cops are always wrong and that crime is actually the rational response of the oppressed, the police bureaucracy in most larger departments is viciously political, and their job is entirely thankless.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by lgw (121541) on Friday August 15, @04:15PM (#24620645) Journal
This confisaction happened at a protest rally, not in game stores. The police confiscated items which seemed likely to be used by troublemakers, including bolt cutters and balaclavas with the word evil stiched on them.
Still a horrible abuse of police power, IMO, but not the work of drooling idiots.
Parent
Re:Fascist state (Score:5, Insightful)
by Ihmhi (1206036) on Friday August 15, @06:17PM (#24622069)
There's an interesting documentary on the subject called V For Vendetta.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by kalirion (728907) on Friday August 15, @02:02PM (#24618577)
There should also be an effort made to ensure that the Police are in fact aware of what the laws are.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by Aphoxema (1088507) * on Friday August 15, @02:16PM (#24618853) Homepage Journal
The only way law enforcement can truly hold any power over mind is if the command equal parts fear and admiration.
With this lack of discretion becoming more common, people Pro Streets Game Guide are losing both.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by EchaniDrgn (1039374) on Friday August 15, @02:32PM (#24619129)
Case in point: I sold wicked game singer a car (on a trailer) to an off duty police officer. When I said I'd tow the car to his place because the registration wasn't current he said he could just drive it home. I pointed out the expired tags and he said, "It's OK, if I get pulled over I'll just Badge 'em."
I wish I were lying.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by fiannaFailMan (702447) on Friday August 15, @02:26PM (#24619031) Journal
I disagree. The GP makes a valid point about how the police need to be policed more rigorously than other citizens. When a 'normal' citizen steps out of line, that's one thing. When someone with the power of arrest and considerable other powers steps out of line, that's a very serious matter. Nothing undermines society more than corrupt officials who should be enforcing the rules.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by Shotgun (30919) on Friday August 15, @03:12PM (#24619769)
You do realize this happened in the UK, right?
No federal government there. And no concept of by or for the people either.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by name*censored* (884880) on Friday August 15, @06:34PM (#24622189)
I have to disagree w/ your signature though. Taking guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens only lets criminals have a free reign.
*sigh*. Find a country that has more stringent gun control - but a higher gun-related crime-rate than USA, then maybe you'll have some credibility. Hell, I'd settle for a comparison between "crimes-thwarted-by-armed-joe-sixpacks" versus "crimes-committed-with-legally-purchased-guns" which favours the former situation (and no, don't tell me that the knowledge of armed victims scares would-be criminals into lawfulness, if it did you'd have less crime). Besides, any "law abiding citizen" can purchase a gun, and then become a "criminal" once they have it - it's not like would-be criminals are born with the word "DANGER" tattooed into their foreheads.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by Hatta (162192) on Friday August 15, @04:18PM (#24620659) Journal
I was born here. I have every right to be here without consenting to any agreement whatsoever.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Funny)
by ozamosi (615254) on Friday August 15, @03:07PM (#24619679) video game programming hardware Homepage
We'll use the slashdot moderation system and let the public police the police that police the police.
What's great about this is that we already have a metamoderation system, so we can police the public that police the police that police the police.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by pilgrim23 (716938) on Friday August 15, @01:28PM (#24617967)
I am older, and was raised to always trust a policeman.
As an adult, I rarely say this: My parents were wrong.
The Republic is now an Empire.. with the centurions carrying assault rifles
Rei Publicae Scutum no longer...
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by TheGratefulNet (143330) on Friday August 15, @01:42PM (#24618211)
I am older, and was raised to always trust a policeman.
As an adult, I rarely say this: My parents were wrong.
The Republic is now an Empire.. with the centurions carrying assault rifles
when I traveled to the UK, many years ago, I ran into the same sentiment - that 'ask a friendly policeman on the corner' if you need help or have a question. nice friendly guys (....)
that ship has sailed. now, the current wisdom is to never talk to cops (2) [youtube.com] never talk to cops (1) [youtube.com]
this is BOTH a copy AND a lawyer giving this advice!
clearly, they are not anymore representing 'the will of the people'. they are anti-freedom and you would be best advised to consider the huge risk by even talking to them, even if you are innoncent. a slip of a casual word CAN be used against you and there is never ever 'off the record' when you talk to cops.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by TheGratefulNet (143330) on Friday August 15, @02:13PM (#24618779)
go watch BOTH, videos, dude. its a cop AND a lawyer. no, its not someone who THINKS they are a lawyer, its the real deal and he's giving valid legal advice.
if you don't believe him, why would you reject the cop's view - it ALSO echo's the same thing. he goes into detail about how they are TRAINED to probe you for info and even an innocent statement can hang you by the 'nads.
this is not 'an interesting video' it should be REQUIRED READING/WATCHING in civics class. people must be taught that the state is now to be held with strong distrust. in fact, that was some of the basic operational concepts in history of the video game Big Game Prowler the founding of america!
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by Darkness404 (1287218) on Friday August 15, @01:51PM (#24618409)
We have nothing to fear but the state itself
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by damburger (981828) on Friday August 15, @02:17PM (#24618855)
Bullshit. The guys who shot Jean-Charles de Menezes were ultimately only convicted of a health and safety violation. As Mark Steel dryly commented, shooting someone in the head 7 times is both unhealthy and unsafe.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by sm62704 (957197) on Friday August 15, @01:57PM (#24618497) Journal
I refrain from a rant, but the more police I meet, the more I hate the police.
I don't. Refrain, I mean; here's my rant from January- Police State: In USSA, cops hassle YOU! [slashdot.org] The police ought to serve a good purpose, protecting us from robbers, thieves, rapists, murderers, etc. But all too often the police themselves are the villians [illinoistimes.com]. The last link is about a cop here in central Illinois who was charged with 49 felonies including one count of obstructing justice, three counts of criminal sexual abuse, seven counts of criminal sexual assault, seven counts of armed violence, 10 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault, and 21 counts of official misconduct. He plead guilty to TWO MISDEMEANORS and got off. Anybody else would have been behind bars for the rest of their lives.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by Kamokazi (1080091) on Friday August 15, @02:05PM (#24618635)
To be fair, from TFA:
"The satirical board game was confiscated along with knives, chisels and bolt cutters, from climate protesters during a series of raids near Kingsnorth power station, in Kent, last week."
The Word Riot Game Hints game was one of the items they took along with the real dangerous stuff. They were presumably caught planning a break-in to a power plant (the article is scant on important details, and chooses to focus on the board game). It's still kind of stilly that they took the game, but realizing that they had knived and devices intended to break into and probably sabotage a power plant puts a whole different perspective on the situation. I would chalk it more up to police officers being overcautious (or clueless) and siezing anything that could possibly be considered evidence of their intentions. Had they has other baclavas, they probably would have siezed those as well).
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by pluther (647209) <pluther AT usa DOT net> on Friday August 15, @02:37PM (#24619233) Homepage
"The real dangerous stuff" is "...knives, chisels and bolt cutters..."
I have all of those in my home, too. Along with even more dangerous stuff like shovels, hedge clippers, wire cutters, electronics tools, chemicals, an axe, a lawnmower and a couple of rakes.
I also have a good deal of satirical materials, including a card game about Nuclear War.
And I've even been involved in "climate protests" - there are even pictures of me online before the Iraq invasion carrying a mass-made sign proclaiming "Go solar, not ballistic".
Yet, it's never even occurred to me to try to "break into and probably sabotage a power plant". Not even when I lived near one.
Perhaps I'm safe because I don't own a balaclava?
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by mlwmohawk (801821) on Friday August 15, @01:42PM (#24618209)
it's just not a good enough reason to "hate the police."
I'm not going to go on my typical police rant, but this is not an isolated incident, but a general pattern of behavior seemingly for police everywhere.
I know a LOT of police. I have a step brother who is head of a police union. I have plenty of stories.
The police almost NEVER come to your door to "help" you. Even if they save your life, keep your mouth shut. In Boston the last few years we've had fairly peaceful celebrations after some sports wins, and the police are leading the homicide and injury count.
In dorchester and southie (Boston, MA) under-achievers became criminals or cops. The cops are worse.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by Atheil (1184445) on Friday August 15, in the game @01:48PM (#24618343)
According to the article "The satirical board game was confiscated along with knives, chisels and bolt cutters, from climate protesters during a series of raids near Kingsnorth power station, in Kent, last week." So they actually just grabbed a ton of stuff. It's not like the only thing they took was the board game. I agree that they probably should have been more selective, but generally they prefer to be on the thorough side, versus the nicer side.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by damburger (981828) on Friday August 15, @01:44PM (#24618259)
Since when did our police not have guns? The unarmed bobby on a bicycle toting a whistle is very much a thing of the past.
As one unfortunate Brazillian man found out, our police have guns and they are all pickles aliens game too happy to use them.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 15, @02:13PM (#24618781)
Though, I do worry a bit about the highly trained specialist Firearms Unit shooting *eleven* dumdum bullets at the guy on a busy subway train. Three of the bullets actually missed at close range.
It doesn't sound like the work of a trained marksman, it's the sort of behaviour I would expect of a scared lunatic.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by Sockatume (732728) on Friday August 15, @02:20PM (#24618909) Homepage
Indeed, the lofty positions and training of all involved just makes it worse. They're supposed to be the anti-terrorist elite, and they stalk some random guy around London for an hour, let him onto a train, and shoot him to bits in front of the passengers? Begging their pardon, but even if he had been a terrorist, their reactions would've showed a staggering degree of ineptitude. From investigation to execution, it was just plain bad policing.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Interesting)
by damburger (981828) on Friday August 15, @02:00PM (#24618535)
Furthermore, some have suggested that the ridiculously gung-ho attitude displayed by the police on that day may in part be a result of having received counter-terrorism training from the Israelis, hardly renowned for respecting the civil rights of those they consider enemies of the state.
Of course, that hardly exonerates the officers in question, any more than 'we were obeying orders' exonerated Nazis.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by jregel (39009) on Friday August 15, @02:28PM (#24619069) Homepage
The problem with Stockwell wasn't with one individual getting it wrong; it was the entire intelligence operation that couldn't communicate properly and panicked in the aftermath of the 7/7 bombings. The result was a tragic mistake.
I wouldn't call the people who shot Jean Charles de Menezes morons. He/They got the wrong man, but they followed a man who they thought was going to be a suicide bomber down into the Tube to stop him. That actually calls for a fair amount of bravery.
Of course, this might all be completely off-topic because according to The Times [timesonline.co.uk], the "policemen" might have actually been Special Forces Military Intelligence (the super secret SRR).
Although the anti-Police sentiments seem to be popular on Slashdot, my personal, limited experience with the UK Police has always been postive. I find that if you are polite and show them respect, and don't automatically take a defensive position, they tend to be absolutely fine. YMMV.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by jacquesm (154384) <{j} {at} {ww.com}> on Friday August 15, @02:33PM (#24619157) Homepage
The person with the gun is the one that pulled the trigger.
Sure his superiors fucked up, and royally so.
But he was the one to make the call, and by the looks of it anybody with a coat on on a warm day is now subject to possible shootings by overzealous police officers.
I repeat, there was *0* and I really mean absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the person they were following was a terrorist. Whoever gets to follow the orders carries part of the blame, you can not be absolved for killing an innocent person by claiming to simply be doing your job, that sort of excuse went out the window a long long time ago, and for a very good reason.
The hand that pulls the trigger is connected to an arm that is connected to a brain, that is supposed to think for itself, not to blindly follow orders, especially not if they're coming from a group of people that have been known to err before.
The whole system of justice is based on evidence, that's not a thing to throw overboard lightly.
The person that was shot had not committed any crime, Window Girl Online Game Walkthrough was not about to commit any crime, was not charged with any crime (regardless of whether they committed one), had no history of committing crimes that would require that person to be stopped with such force.
ESPECIALLY NOT TO BE SHOT IN THE HEAD FROM POINT BLANK RANGE.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by jacquesm (154384) <{j} {at} the marketing game report tmg {ww.com}> on Friday August 15, @03:09PM (#24619721) Homepage
yeah, well I have some news for you too, look at these two photos side by side and tell me if you can tell the bejeweled game free difference:
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2005/08/17/menezes_osman_wideweb__430x253.jpg [theage.com.au]
The guy on the left is the guy that got shot, the guy on the right is the guy they were looking for.
Some other guy a bit further below posted an excellent link to an article in the register that details just how screwed up the situation really was. This should have *NEVER* happened. Really, there is absolutely no excuse for it.
Police apprehend, they certainly do not kill before having a positive id.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by 49152 (690909) on Friday August 15, @05:05PM (#24621305)
Yes, in the US i suppose you would expect to risk your life. At least if I should believe guys like you on ./, what I read in the newspapers and what we see in American movies and television shows.
I still hope it is a bit exaggerated, and not really representative for the majority of cases.
If not I feel truly sorry for your people.
In most of Europe (in fact most of the world) the police would chase after you but will not open fire unless you start shooting back at them. If they have reason to believe you are dangerous they will still warn you, usually several times before opening fire.
And at least in my country I know for a fact they have instructions to shoot to disable and not to kill.
After all we are not barbarians and have done away with the death penalty a long long time ago.
BTW: The man in question here was unarmed and had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks or any other criminal activities.
It has also been established that he never ran from the police password game show as they initially claimed. The police later issued an official apology after this fact leaked to the press.
He did however resemble slightly the man they were looking for. So does a lot of people in London.
The fact of game console the case is that the police officers in question were jumping the gun in this case. Perhaps understandable after the bombings but that is a poor excuse.
If we surrender our rights, freedom and justice system because of the threat of terrorist then the terrorist have won and we may be safe but not free.
One should also remember that the terrorist threat might be spectacular and frightening but in reality it is relatively trivial.
Many many more people die every year in traffic accidents than are being killed by terrorist.
In fact there is a much higher probability that either of us will commit suicide than become victims of a terrorist attack.
It is a sorry state of affairs but people seems to have lost all perspective about this.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Insightful)
by damburger (981828) on Friday August 15, @02:15PM (#24618839)
OK then you racist, authoritarian tosser, let me tear apart your idiotic rambling
1. His overstaying his visa has nothing to do with it. The punishment for that is not summary execution, outside your right-wing fantasies.
2. He was never given a warning to stop, you are simply lying. If you think otherwise, provide a credible claim for this source of stop pissing on the poor mans grave.
3. The idea that he ran in response to the presence of the police is absurd because the police who were tailing him were in plain clothes. He had no idea what was going on until they entered the carriage and murdered him. I challenge you to prove otherwise.
4. Shut the fuck up you BNP loving organ of the police state, and have some respect for an innocent victim of extreme police brutality.
Scum like you make me ashamed of Britian.
Parent
Re:Police thugs (Score:5, Informative)
by Sockatume (732728) on Friday August 15, @02:35PM (#24619199) Homepage
Even the police's official stance is actually that he was wearing a light demin jacket and jeans, walked the whole time, used his Oyster card to enter the station, walked down the steps, then ran across the platform to board the train before it left, and at no point did they identify themselves. Surprisingly this version didn't get nearly as much press coverage as the "parka-wearing lunatic dives across ticket barriers as armed police yell at him to stop" version. Guess the media are too busy to run corrections?
Parent
Ironic in so many ways... (Score:5, Insightful)
by jayveekay (735967) on Friday August 15, @01:22PM (#24617855)
One of which is that this is great publicity for the game and will surely increase sales.
Re:Ironic in so many ways... (Score:5, Interesting)
by R_Dorothy (1096635) on Friday August 15, @02:13PM (#24618783)
Deserved publicity. I've played this several times and it's a great game. Never fails to cause humorous infighting with plenty of obvious parallels with current world politics. I'd highly recommend it to anyone with a sense of humour who likes Risk.
Parent
They need another card. (Score:5, Insightful)
by BitterOldGUy (1330491) on Friday August 15, @01:25PM (#24617921)
Terrorists can use special cards such as "suicide bomber", "plane hijack" and "WMDs" to advance themselves.
They need the "Police in free country crack down on their own people for idiotic reasons and abusing their authority thereby turning free country into a less-free country thereby aiding the terrorists" card.
Re:They need another card. (Score:5, Insightful)
by blueg3 (192743) on Friday August 15, @01:35PM (#24618085)
They need the "Police in free country crack down on their own people for idiotic reasons and abusing their authority thereby turning free country into a less-free country thereby aiding the terrorists" card.
Actually, that's how the terrorist player wins the game.
Parent
Re:They need another card. (Score:5, Insightful)
by T.E.D. (34228) on Friday August 15, @01:40PM (#24618187) Homepage
That's kinda long-winded. How about an "Idiots Elected" card instead?
Parent
I don't understand? (Score:5, Funny)
by UberHoser (868520) on Friday August 15, @01:27PM (#24617951)
Why would you wear a dessert on your head? I mean I can see it if the game was like "Spin the bottle" or something of that ilk...
fashion statement (Score:5, Funny)
by Chief_Wiggum (1341031) on Friday August 15, @01:27PM (#24617955)
Because when I think 'hijacking an airplane', I think about wearing a balaclava with the word EVIL stitched to my head.
Context, context (Score:5, Informative)
by Sockatume (732728) on Friday August 15, @01:33PM (#24618051) Homepage
This was a raid (of uncertain provenance) on a protest outside a power station. The other items seized are "knives, chisels and bolt cutters". It seems to me that the police took the balaclava under the quite reasonable assumption that someone was going to put it on and break into the station using some of the tools. That it was part of a board game is entirely incidental.
If the police seize a pack of ladies' stockings from your home, that's absurd. If they seize a crate of ladies' stockings, bank plans, and a toy gun from your car outside a bank, that's reasonable.
Context (Score:5, Informative)
by Bogtha (906264) on Friday August 15, @01:36PM (#24618095)
The satirical board game was confiscated along with knives, chisels and bolt cutters, from climate protesters during a series of raids near Kingsnorth power station, in Kent, last week.
Here's the thing: a bunch of people were protesting by chaining themselves to gates and generally impeding operations at a power station. The police came along, hauled them off, and took away the tools they were using. Knives, chisels, bolt cutters, and balaclavas.
It's got nothing to do with balaclavas being illegal, any more than bolt cutters are illegal. It's got nothing at all to do with the game itself. It's the fact that the masks were being used in the process of shutting down a power station.
Did anybody spot that most of the article was dedicated to describing the game and its distribution hopes, as if it were a game review, while the confiscation itself got just a single sentence in the article? This is a fucking advert. The creators, from Cambridge, heard about it, and got their mate at the local paper, in Cambridge to write about it as a favour. This is a local paper, and the event the article is supposed to be talking about happened in Kent, 100 miles away.
Bloody pigs (Score:5, Interesting)
by damburger (981828) on Friday August 15, @01:38PM (#24618135)
The UK police are a serious threat to liberty, and I say this as someone who used to work for them.
They are monumentally petty, generally taking the view that who they arrest should be based on who they don't like the look of rather than who has done something wrong, and then sort out the crime they are to be charged with later.
A common method is to approach people whose appearance suggests poverty (normally written down as "looking suspicious), and intimidating them until they do something that could be construed as resisting arrest or assaulting the officer, then haul them away and throw them in a cell.
They then whinge about having to do loads of 'paperwork' which basically translates to 'its difficult to pin crimes on everybody we haul in'. Having been on the paperwork end of policing I can safely say that if someone has be caught for a specific crime (rather than hauled in for wearing a tracksuit and leaned on) then it isn't hard to get them convicted.
The majority of policing in the city I worked in (where I saw every file that went through the local magistrates court, albeit briefly in most cases) consisted of protecting the property of city businesses, banging up drunks, and bullying chavs.
Also there are restrictions on the spinner device (Score:5, Funny)
by dilvish_the_damned (167205) <dant AT tg-embedded DOT com> on Friday August 15, @01:41PM (#24618195) Journal
Technically the spinner is a munition, developed specifically for US intelligence.
Get More Comments
Search
Portability should be the default. -- Larry Wall in <199711072201.OAA01123@wall.org>
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2008 SourceForge, Inc.
home
awards
contribute story
older articles
sourceforge, inc.
advertise
about
terms of service
privacy
faq
rss |
|
|
