President Reagan's Speech to the House of
Commons, June 8, 1982
___ We're approaching the end of a
bloody century plagued by a terrible political invention --
totalitarianism. Optimism comes less easily today, not because
democracy is less vigorous, but because democracy's enemies have
refined their instruments of repression. Yet optimism is in order
because day by day democracy is proving itself to be a not at all
fragile flower. From Stettin on the Baltic to Varna on the Black Sea,
the regimes planted by totalitarianism have had more than thirty
years to establish their legitimacy. But none -- not one regime --
has yet been able to risk free elections. Regimes planted by bayonets
do not take root
___ The strength of the Solidarity
movement in Poland demonstrates the truth told in an underground joke
in the Soviet Union. It is that the Soviet Union would remain a
one-party nation even if an opposition party were permitted because
everyone would join the opposition party
___ Historians looking back at our time
will note the consistent restraint and peaceful intentions of the
West. They will note that it was the democracies who refused to use
the threat of their nuclear monopoly in the forties and early fifties
for territorial or imperial gain. Had that nuclear monopoly been in
the hands of the Communist world, the map of Europe--indeed, the
world--would look very different today. And certainly they will note
it was not the democracies that invaded Afghanistan or suppressed
Polish Solidarity or used chemical and toxin warfare in Afghanistan
and Southeast Asia.
___ If history teaches anything, it
teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. We
see around us today the marks of our terrible dilemma--predictions of
doomsday, antinuclear demonstrations, an arms race in which the West
must, for its own protection, be an unwilling participant. At the
same time we see totalitarian forces in the world who seek subversion
and conflict around the globe to further their barbarous assault on
the human spirit. What, then, is our course? Must civilization perish
in a hail of fiery atoms? Must freedom wither in a quiet, deadening
accommodation with totalitarian evil?
___ Sir Winston Churchill refused to
accept the inevitability of war or even that it was imminent. He
said, "I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they
desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their
power and doctrines. But what we have to consider here today while
time remains is the permanent prevention of war and the establishment
of conditions of freedom and democracy as rapidly as possible in all
countries."
___ Well, this is precisely our mission
today: to preserve freedom as well as peace. It may not be easy to
see; but I believe we live now at a turning point.
___ In an ironic sense Karl Marx was
right. We are witnessing today a great revolutionary crisis, a crisis
where the demands of the economic order are conflicting directly with
those of the political order. But the crisis is happening not in the
free, non-Marxist West but in the home of Marxism- Leninism, the
Soviet Union. It is the Soviet Union that runs against the tide of
history by denying human freedom and human dignity to its citizens.
It also is in deep economic difficulty. The rate of growth in the
national product has been steadily declining since the fifties and is
less than half of what it was then.
___ The dimensions of this failure are
astounding: a country which employs one-fifth of its population in
agriculture is unable to feed its own people. Were it not for the
private sector, the tiny private sector tolerated in Soviet
agriculture, the country might be on the brink of famine. These
private plots occupy a bare 3 percent of the arable land but account
for nearly one-quarter of Soviet farm output and nearly one-third of
meat products and vegetables. Overcentralized, with little or no
incentives, year after year the Soviet system pours its best
resources into the making of instruments of destruction. The constant
shrinkage of economic growth combined with the growth of military
production is putting a heavy strain on the Soviet people. What we
see here is a political structure that no longer corresponds to its
economic base, a society where productive forced are hampered by
political ones.
___ The decay of the Soviet experiment
should come as no surprise to us.
___ Wherever the comparisons have been
made between free and closed societies -- West Germany and East
Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia, Malaysia and Vietnam -- it is
the democratic countries that are prosperous and responsive to the
needs of their people. And one of the simple but overwhelming facts
of our time is this: of all the millions of refugees we've seen in
the modern world, their flight is always away from, not toward the
Communist world. Today on the NATO line, our military forces face
east to prevent a possible invasion. On the other side of the line,
the Soviet forces also face east to prevent their people from
leaving.
___ The hard evidence of totalitarian
rule has caused in mankind an uprising of the intellect and will.
Whether it is the growth of the new schools of economics in America
or England or the appearance of the so-called new philosophers in
France, there is one unifying thread running through the intellectual
work of these groups -- rejection of the arbitrary power of the
state, the refusal to subordinate the rights of the individual to the
superstate, the realization that collectivism stifles all the best
human impulses....
___ Chairman Brezhnev repeatedly has
stressed that the competition of ideas and systems must continue and
that this is entirely consistent with relaxation of tensions and
peace.
___ Well, we ask only that these systems
begin by living up to their own constitutions, abiding by their own
laws, and complying with the international obligations they have
undertaken. We ask only for a process, a direction, a basic code of
decency, not for an instant transformation.
___ We cannot ignore the fact that even
without our encouragement there has been and will continue to be
repeated explosion against repression and dictatorships. The Soviet
Union itself is not immune to this reality. Any system is inherently
unstable that has no peaceful means to legitimize its leaders. In
such cases, the very repressiveness of the state ultimately drives
people to resist it, if necessary, by force.
___ While we must be cautious about
forcing the pace of change, we must not hesitate to declare our
ultimate objectives and to take concrete actions to move toward them.
We must be staunch in our conviction that freedom is not the sole
prerogative of a lucky few but the inalienable and universal right of
all human beings. So states the United Nations Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, which, among other things, guarantees free
elections.
___ The objective I propose is quite
simple to state: to foster the infrastructure of democracy, the
system of a free press, unions, political parties, universities,
which allows a people to choose their own way to develop their own
culture, to reconcile their own differences through peaceful means.
___ This is not cultural imperialism; it
is providing the means for genuine self-determination and protection
for diversity. Democracy already flourishes in countries with very
different cultures and historical experiences. It would be cultural
condescension, or worse, to say that any people prefer dictatorship
to democracy. Who would voluntarily choose not to have the right to
vote, decide to purchase government propaganda handouts instead of
independent newspapers, prefer government to worker-controlled
unions, opt for land to be owned by the state instead of those who
till it, want government repression of religious liberty, a single
political party instead of a free choice, a rigid cultural orthodoxy
instead of democratic tolerance and diversity.
___ Since 1917 the Soviet Union has
given covert political training and assistance to Marxist-Leninists
in many countries. Of course, it also has promoted the use of
violence and subversion by these same forces. Over the past several
decades, West European and other social democrats, Christian
democrats, and leaders have offered open assistance to fraternal,
political, and social institutions to bring about peaceful and
democratic progress. Appropriately, for a vigorous new democracy, the
Federal Republic of Germany's political foundations have become a
major force in this effort.
___ We in America now intend to take
additional steps, as many of our allies have already done, toward
realizing this same goal. The chairmen and other leaders of the
national Republican and Democratic party organizations are initiating
a study with the bipartisan American Political Foundation to
determine how the United States can best contribute as a nation to
the global campaign for democracy now gathering force. They will have
the cooperation of congressional leaders of both parties, along with
representatives of business, labor, and other major institutions in
our society. I look forward to receiving their recommendations and to
working with these institutions and the Congress in the common task
of strengthening democracy throughout the world.
___ It is time that we committed
ourselves as a nation -- in both the public and private sectors -- to
assisting democratic development....
___ What I am describing now is a plan
and a hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy
which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history as it
has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the
self-expression of the people. And that's why we must continue our
efforts to strengthen NATO even as we move forward with our
zero-option initiative in the negotiations on intermediate-range
forces and our proposal for a one-third reduction in strategic
ballistic missile warheads.
___ Our military strength is a
prerequisite to peace, but let it be clear we maintain this strength
in the hope it will never be used, for the ultimate determinant in
the struggle that's now going on in the world will not be bombs and
rockets but a test of wills and ideas, a trial of spiritual resolve,
the values we hold, the beliefs we cherish, the ideals to which we
are dedicated.
___ The British people know that, given
strong leadership, time, and a little bit of hope, the forces of good
ultimately rally and triumph over evil. Here among you is the cradle
of self-government, the Mother of Parliaments. Here is the enduring
greatness of the British contribution to mankind, the great civilized
ideas: individual liberty, representative government, and the rule of
law under God.
___ I've often wondered about the
shyness of some of us in the West about standing for these ideals
that have done so much to ease the plight of man and the hardships of
our imperfect world. This reluctance to use those vast resources at
our command reminds me of the elderly lady whose home was bombed in
the blitz. As the rescuers moved about, they found a bottle of brandy
she'd stored behind the staircase, which was all that was left
standing. And since she was barely conscious, one of the workers
pulled the cork to give her a taste of it. She came around
immediately and said, "Here now -- there now, put it back. That's for
emergencies."
___ Well, the emergency is upon us. Let
us be shy no longer. Let us go to our strength. Let us offer hope.
Let us tell the world that a new age is not only possible but
probable.
___ During the dark days of the Second
World War, when this island was incandescent with courage, Winston
Churchill exclaimed about Britain's adversaries, "What kind of people
do they think we are?" Well, Britain's adversaries found out what
extraordinary people the British are. But all the democracies paid a
terrible price for allowing the dictators to underestimate us. We
dare not make that mistake again. So, let us ask ourselves, "What
kind of people do we think we are?" And let us answer, "Free people,
worthy of freedom and determined not only to remain so but to help
others gain their freedom as well."
___ Sir Winston led his people to great
victory in war and then lost an election just as the fruits of
victory were about to be enjoyed. But he left office honorably and,
as it turned out, temporarily, knowing that the liberty of his people
was more important than the fate of any single leader. History
recalls his greatness in ways no dictator will ever know. And he left
us a message of hope for the future, as timely now as when he first
uttered it, as opposition leader in the Commons nearly twenty-seven
years ago, when he said, "When we look back on all the perils through
which we have passed and at the mighty foes that we have laid low and
all the dark and deadly designs that we have frustrated, why should
we fear for our future? We have," he said, "come safely through the
worst."
___ Well, the task I've set forth will
long outlive our own generation. But together, we too have come
through the worst. Let us now begin a major effort to secure the best
-- a crusade for freedom that will engage the faith and fortitude of
the next generation. For the sake of peace and justice, let us move
toward a world in which all people are at last free to determine
their own destiny.
return to article list