For the week of April 3rd, 1998
The Revolution of 1998
I'm so sick and tired of this debate. I find it mildly amusing that in America, this is regarded for treason, which I believe is still an offence punishable by death. Bouchard would be dead right now. But low and behold, the country of Canada is too kind to kill off those who wish to destroy it, so we'll let some pompous judges decide the matter in a court of law. I suppose that is better than a revolution, but it is not exactly a solution to the problem.
What I'd like to know is this - what does it expect to do once it goes? Bouchard cannot expect his newfound "country" to have much backing from other countries, especially ours; most of its revenue is from english-speaking businesses who would leave at the first sign of separation, and the natives are drooling over the territory like they've watched Braveheart one too many times, repeating "It's my island," over and over.
Can a new country survive under all that? The States did it, but that
was a few centuries ago. This is not something that happens nowadays, except
in the territories once known as Yugoslavia. And they're doing just fine.
So, what is the solution? Well, surprise surprise, I don't know. But
I say we say Quebec is no longer a country, then the exact same second,
give it all to the Native Americans on all the reserves in Canada. They
were here first, and they are truly the most distinct society in the country.
All's fair in love and war. And in revolution
Copyright © 2000 Besz Dispenser Publications, Inc.