######################################## #Written by David Tam, 1999. # #davidkftam@netscape.net Copyright 1999# ######################################## From tamda@ecf.toronto.edu Mon Jul 12 18:33:50 1999 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 23:34:31 -0400 (EDT) From: David Kar Fai Tam To: APS 424S Subject: #25-04/06/99-"Molson uncaps new ad campaign" The Globe and Mail, Wednesday, March 31, 1999. B31. This article is about Molson's new marketing campaign. The brewer will no longer be using its famous "I am" slogan anymore. Instead they have switch to something like "It's where we get Canadian". This will have a double meaning of where one should go to obtain a bottle of Molson Canadian beer, and where one should go to become culturalized and Canadianized. Part of the reason for this switch is that Molson has hired a new marketing company to perform the advertising. As well, many other companies have recently begun using the exact same slogan, but for their own products. In contrary to Molson's belief that the old slogan is no longer relevant to the company, I believe the exact opposite. Their old slogan is so powerful and popular that other companies could not resist using it. It is quite strange that Molson has allowed others to use the old slogan. Perhaps it was never trademarked, or perhaps the old slogan has become so synonymous with Molson Canadian beer that Molson considers it to be a form of free advertising for itself. Molson believes the old slogan was not applicable across the entire country and that it could not be localized to regional markets such as the Atlantic provinces, or the west. I disagree wit this reasoning as well. The "I am" slogan is very flexible and can apply to so many different situations. In fact, that is partly why other companies have begun using the slogan. I think the new slogan is also a very good one that has many applications in Molson's realm. Their brand building reputation has been known to be very solid. Despite the new campaign, if I were Molson, I would not have embraced the new slogan in the first place but would have tried to stop other companies from exploiting old slogan. Perhaps I would have used both slogans. The old one is much shorter and simpler, and can be used quite effectively in locations where advertisement space is limited or attention spans are extremely short, such as bill boards and other signs. The new slogan is quite a bit longer and more complex. Perhaps it is more applicable to television ads and print media. "I am" is short, sweet, and memorable. "It's where we get Canadian" has deeper meaning but is more complex.