GREENPEACE Briefing

24 Jul 1998

INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR INDUSTRY AND THE AKKUYU TENDER

All three consortia competing for the Akkuyu project RESPONDED TO the Adana earthquake BY CLAIMING that their reactors would stand an earthquake of magnitude 8 Richter or more. However, A 1996 REPORT BY A GERMAN SCIENTIST DISPUTES THIS: "There are no publications available that indicate to what degree these power plants are constructed to resist the effect of seismic events. In spite of repeated inquiries since 1988, the IAEA has released no information. ...it can be generally said that ...it is not technically possible to construct nuclear power plants that are sufficiently safe from earthquakes." 1

Potential dangers posed by earthquakes to nuclear installations were recently highlighted by a Court decision in Germany WHICH CLOSED the Muelheim-Kaerlich reactor because the EARTHQUAKE risk had not been properly investigated, and had possibly BEEN underestimated.Yet the German Government is now providing financial backing for Siemens in its bid to build nuclear reactors at Akkuyu Bay DESPITE AN EVEN GREATER LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT SEISMIC RISK.

The AKKUYU SITE was LICENSED 22 YEARS AGO without extensive seismological, geological and geophysical research about the Ecemis Fault Line. TEAS and the consortia consider Ecemis inactive and THEY HAVE NOT RESPONDED TO the findings of a recent study showing THE FAULT extends into the Mediterranean only 20-25 km southeast of Akkuyu Bay.2

THE IAEA STATES THAT: "Of the extreme external hazards, seismic events receive special attention owing to the extent to which they can jeopardize safety. A nuclear power plant is protected against earthquakes in two ways: BY SITING IT AWAY FROM AREAS OF ACTIVE FAULTING.. .".3

Kobe's devastating earthquake was unleashed by a break along a fault system where NO LARGE EARTHQUAKE HAS STRUCK FOR AT LEAST A THOUSAND YEARS and which SCIENTISTS HAD NOT CONSIDERED A MAJOR HAZARD." 4

In Japan, the reference reactor of the Westinghouse - Mitsubishi consortium for Akkuyu, OHI-3 generates electricity for 7 cents/Kwh
(on the Japanese Islands practically every site is subject at any time to earthquakes reaching a magnitude of 8.25 - 9.0 Richter) while the NPI bid which is supposed to stand an earthquake of more than 8 Richter scale is 2.5 cents/kWh and the other 2 bids are both under 4cents/kWh! How can the bids for Akkuyu be so low?

NUCLEAR CONSORTIA AND TEAS CANNOT FINALIZE THE TENDER WITHOUT DETAILED SEISMOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE SOUTHERN EXTENTION OF THE ECEMIS FAULT LINE NEAR AKKUYU BAY, BOTH ON LAND AND AT THE SEA BOTTOM BY INDEPENDENT EXPERTS. Greenpeace is calling on the Turkish Government to immediately suspend its nuclear plans and on the western governments, who are financing the deal, to immediately withdraw from the bid process.

 

For More information please call:
Melda Keskin, Greenpeace Mediterranean: ++90 212 2364238
or mobile ++90 532 3243204;
Ben Pearson, Greenpeace International: ++31 20 5249563.

1 The Risk of Earthquake Damage to Nuclear Power Plants in East and Southeast Asia-A geological survey and evaluation, Dr. Eckhard Grimmel, Institute of Geography University of Hamburg; January 1996.

2 Gokcen, S.L, Kelling, G., Ulug, A., Gokcen, N. & Ozel, E., "Neotectonic Structural Features in the Alanya - Mersin Shelf Area (Southern Turkey)", 1991.

3 The IAEA's Safety Series, "Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants".

4 Earthquakes report: Minor fault, major disaster, Rosie Mestel, Newscientist, vol. 145, no.1962, 28 Jan 1995.

-


This page hosted by Get your own Free Homepage
1