Atik Tasimalari Kaliforniya'nin Nukleer Korkularini Uyandirdi

9 Temmuz 1998 - 10:30
Reuters
- Yukari Iwatani

Bir dizi tehlikeli atik aktarimlarindan ilkini gerceklestirecek olan bir kargo gemisi, bu ay icinde bir gun su unlu Altin Kopru'nun altinda geciyor olacak.

Idaho'daki federal atik bolgesine California Uzerinden, Asya'dan gelen yuksek radyoaktiviteli, bes planlanmis aktarma yapilacak. Bu nukleer yakit cubuklarinin tasinmaya baslanacagi tarih oldukca gizli tutuluyor.

Resmi agizli yetkililer, Californiyali cevrecilere ve yerel siyasilere karsi, bu tasimayi savunuyor ve bunun ABD hukumetinin zenginlestirilmis uranyumu teroristler ile dusman ulkelerden uzak tutmaya calismasi olarak gosteriyorlar.

( Asagidaki ozgun Ingilizce haberde kararsiz/degisken yapili bolgelerde atik tutulmasinin sakincali oldugundan. Ama buna karsin bu atiklari onca yol boyunca insanlarin yasadiklari yerlerin yakinindan gecirmenin tehlikede geri kalmadigi vurgulaniyor. - Cev. )

10:30 AM ET 07/09/98

Waste shipments raise Calif. nuclear fears

By Yukari Iwatani

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- One day this month, a cargo ship will steam beneath famed Golden Gate Bridge with the first in a series of sinister shipments -- deadly nuclear waste, packed in lead-lined casks.

Secrecy surrounds the exact shipping schedule for the South Korean nuclear fuel rods, the first of five planned transfers of highly radioactive Asian nuclear waste to move through California on its way to a federal storage site in Idaho.

But officials, fighting rising alarm among California environmentalists and local politicians, say the move is a key part of the U.S. government's effort to keep highly enriched uranium out of the hands of terrorists and hostile nations.

``We're concerned about the security aspects of storage in Asia, especially in unstable countries, as witnessed by the current situation in Indonesia,'' Department of Energy spokesman John Belluardo said. ``It's much wiser to have this in the hands of the U.S. under our security than overseas.''

Environmental activists in California are not so sure. They say the threat of an accident is worth worrying about and accuse the government of playing a dangerous game by shipping nuclear fuel rods through some of the state's most densely populated areas.

``One has to take these (official) assertions of safety with a sizable grain of skepticism,'' California Coastal Commission Executive Director Peter Douglas told a reporter. ``It's been said before that something is foolproof, then, lo and behold, the unthinkable happens.''

'ATOMS FOR PEACE' PLAN BRINGS WASTE TO U.S.

According to Energy Department officials, after the nuclear waste arrives at the Concord Naval Weapons Station near San Francisco it will be transported almost 1,000 miles via railroad passing through communities in northern California, Nevada, Utah and Idaho. It will be ``temporarily stored'' in Idaho until a permanent dumping ground is approved.

Four more shipments of nuclear waste from countries such as Bangladesh, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines are scheduled to move through the San Francisco Bay area by 2009. In addition, up to 231 shipments from other parts of the world will be taken to the Energy Department's Savannah River storage site near Aiken, South Carolina, through Charleston.

The shipments are part of the ``Atoms for Peace'' program created in the early 1950s by the Eisenhower administration in which Washington agreed to supply nuclear research reactors and fuel on the condition that the spent fuel would be returned.

Shipments used to be secret but now California's vocal environmentalists are speaking out. Their chief fear is the potential threat to residents, the environment and the local economy. For example, they say even a small accident could harm California's fishing industry because of public perceptions even if no radiation is released.

UNTHINKABLE MIGHT HAPPEN

Although the waste will be encased in casks with eight-inch -thick walls of lead and steel that have survived a myriad of endurance tests, they still worry that somehow the unthinkable might happen.

The state Coastal Commission's request to review federal plans before the shipments arrive has been denied and a U.S. district court threw out a lawsuit filed by two local governments seeking to block the shipment, saying the federal government had sufficiently addressed potential environmental impacts associated with the program.

While 16 Bay Area communities have passed resolutions opposing the federal plan, the Energy Department says all necessary safety inspections and precautions have been taken and the chance of accidental leakage during transport is extremely low -- on the order of one in a billion.

``Not only will these shipments be safe, they will help to make the world a safer place,'' acting Secretary of Energy Elizabeth Moler said in a guest editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle.

But anti-nuclear activists and lawmakers say the transport route planned for the radioactive shipments is hazardous. Specifically, they say Concord's port is near an active earthquake fault and the rail route through California's Feather River canyons is perilous.

As recently as last month, two weather-triggered landslides in the canyon derailed two rail cars and sent mobile-home-size boulders careening onto the tracks. Prior to these incidents, some 28 trains have derailed there in 15 years.

While U.S. Rep. Ellen Tauscher has formally asked for a safety study before the program begins, the Energy Department has declined. Belluardo, the department's spokesman, said Union Pacific railroad has already spent several million dollars to upgrade the tracks, bolt down loose rocks and install sensors to warn oncoming trains of any impending danger.
The department has also trained about 3,000 ``emergency responders'' along the route, including hospital staff, police and firefighters.

``The casks are virtually indestructible,'' Belluardo said. ''During the past 40 years, there have been some 2,500 shipments of spent nuclear fuel, and because these casks have been so robust there's never been a radioactive release of material. From that standpoint, we have an excellent record.''

- REUTERS


This page hosted by Get your own Free Homepage
1