June 1999
1. INTRODUCTION
Aims of the Internet Code of Practice:
1.1 WHO THE INTERNET CODE OF PRACTICE APPLIES TO
For the purposes of this document:
1.2 COMPLIANCE
All members of the Internet Code of Practice will:
1.3 INDUSTRY AWARENESS
Members of the Internet Code of Practice must require their employees and agents to operate within the guidelines of the Code.
2. CODE OF CONDUCT OF ALL INDUSTRY MEMBERS
2.1 MEMBERS OF THE INTERNET CODE OF PRACTICE WILL:
2.2 MEMBERS OF THE INTERNET CODE OF PRACTICE WILL NOT:
3.CONDUCT OF ISPs
3.1 ISP'S WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE INTERNET CODE OF PRACTICE WILL MAKE AVAILABLE TO EACH CUSTOMER:
3.2 INTERCONNECTION
In acknowledgement of the co-operative nature of the Internet, all members of the Internet Code of Practice who provide Internet Access services agree to the principal of unrestricted and open interconnection between members.
3.3 BLOCKING
Members of the Internet Code of Practice agree that blocking traffic from other parts of the Internet disrupts the integrity of the Internet, and should only be carried out in circumstances where it cannot be avoided. All other non-urgent circumstances such as disputes should be resolved using the Internet Code of Practice dispute procedures.
3.4 CONTENT
The Internet provides for a significant amount of free-speech between citizens, and this is protected by statute in many countries. The Code proposes that all Internet content within New Zealand be subject to the New Zealand Films, Videos and Publication Classifications Act, 1993. A subsection of the Act applicable to this is included in Appendix B.
3.5 COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC SITES
3.5.1 Commercial and public sites who are members of the Internet Code of Practice will ensure that the client is informed
3.5.2 Commercial and public sites that are members of the Internet Code of Practice will ensure that adult services hosted are:
3.5.3 Commercial and public sites who are members of the Internet Code of Practice will work towards and support the adoption of a system of content identification related to adult services.
4. CONFORMING TO INTERNET STANDARDS (RFCs)
All members of the Internet Code of Practice must conform to accepted international Internet standards such as those set out by the RFCs.
4.1 CUSTOMER EDUCATION
Where ISP's are dealing with non-commercial customers or users:
4.2 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Each member of the Internet Code of Practice will comply with the following dispute resolution procedures:
has adopted the Internet Code of Practice
Signed
Name
Title/Occupation
Date
APPENDIX A
Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS) - a site classification system which allows designers to place content rating tags on their site. The system allows a graduated rating, so that for instance, a classical Greek statue which is naked may be rated differently to a photograph of an unclothed person having sex.
APPENDIX B
New Zealand Films, Videos, and Publications Classification, 1993
Below are sections taken from the above Act which the ISP should be aware of.
3. Meaning of objectionable [part of]
(1) For the purpose of this Act, a publication is objectionable if it describes, depicts, expresses, or otherwise deals with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty, or violence in such a manner that the availability of the publication is likely to be injurious to the public good.
(2) A publication shall be deemed to be objectionable for the purposes of this Act if the publication promotes or supports, or tends to promote support of:
(a) The exploitation of children, or young persons, or both, for sexual purposes or
(b) The use of violence or coercion to compel any person to participate in, or submit to, sexual conduct; or
(c) Sexual conduct with or upon the body of a dead person; or
(d) The use of urine or excrement in association with degrading or dehumanising conduct or sexual conduct; or
(e) Bestiality; or
(f) Acts of torture or the infliction of extreme violence or extreme cruelty
123. Offences of strict liability relating to objectionable publications. [part of]
(1) Every person commits an offence against this Act who:
(a) Makes an objectionable publication; or
(b) Makes a Copy of an objectionable publication for the purpose of supply, distribution, display, or exhibition to any other person; or
(c) Supplies, or has in that persons possession for the purpose of supply an objectionable publication; or
(d) For the purposes of supply to any other person, distributes, displays, advertises, or exhibit an objectionable publication; or
(e) In expectation of payment, or otherwise for gain, or by way of advertisement, distributes, displays, exhibits, or otherwise
makes available an objectionable publication to any other person; or
(f) Delivers to any person an objectionable publication with intent that it should be dealt with by that person or any other person in such a manner as to constitute an offence against this section or section 124 or section 127 or section 129 of this Act.
(2) Every person who commits an offence against subsection (1) of this section is liable to a fine not exceeding,-
(a) In the case of an individual, $5,000.
(b) In the case of a body corporate, $15,000
(3) It shall be no defense to a charge under subsection (1) of this section that the defendant had no knowledge or no reasonable cause to believe that the publication to which the charge relates was objectionable.
131. Offence to posses objectionable publication. [part of]
(1) Subject to subsection (4) and (5) of this section, every person commits an offense against this Act who, without lawful authority or excuse, has in that person's possession an objectionable publication.
(2) Every person who commits an offence against subsection (1) of this section is liable to a fine not exceeding:-
(a) In the case of an individual, $2,000
(b) In the case of a body corporate, $5,000
(3) It shall be no defense to a charge under subclause (1) of this section that the defendant had no knowledge or no reasonable cause to believe that the publication to which the charge relates was objectionable.
APPENDIX C
EITHER PARTY MAY NOTIFY THE CODE OF PRACTICE COMPLAINTS BOARD OF THE DISPUTE
The Code of Practice was originally presented on April 15 1997 after a year of development work and was adopted by ISPANZ - the Internet Service Providers Association (now-inactive). The need for self-regulation by industry has grown, and the Code has been evolving over the last two years. Consultation with Industry has taken place on an ad hoc basis and this document reflects the last round of feedback.
The Code is being re-launched, giving the industry the chance to demonstrate to government and the public its commitment to high standards. The Code is not "set in concrete" and regular reviews by Industry will take place.
Feedback and comments from all sectors of the Industry are welcomed. We would also like to hear from Industry members who wish to join the Code Discussion list as part of the ongoing Evaluation and Review process
©1999 The Internet Society of New Zealand
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |