Race 5 Wrap-Up: Darlington Transouth Financial 400

Race 5 Wrap-Up: Darlington Transouth Financial 400

Click here to go to the Race 5 Picks & Comments page.

Click here to go to Sandro's Table of Contents.

Click here to see the official race results at nascar.com.

 

Bizarre Race Weekend Stirs Up Bitter Controversy

 

Races at Darlington are like dates with me: short, borderline disastrous, and only occuring twice a year. This week’s Transouth Financial 400 was no different.

 But much of this week’s drama took place before the green flag fell. The NASCAR world was shocked and grief-stricken on Friday, when Mr. Atlanta Texas Thunder Bobby Labonte wrecked during practice and broke the tip of his right scapula. Some rube had dropped oil on the track in practices for the Saturday Grand National race (which Bobby won last year), and Bobby lost control and collected a bunch of concrete.

 The stock market plunged, suicide rates shot up, and flags were lowered to half-mast. Worst of all, a huge controversy erupted here at NASCAR's most adjudicatorial web page. Nathan found out about the bad news, and emailed me this:

 "Does that count as a DNF? P.S. Is it too late to change my picks?"

 I can tell y'all flat out that you don't get a DNF unless you run the first lap of the wreck. If you get collected in lap two (as Earnhardt did at Darlington), then you can get a DNF. But the second question was more troubling. Should I allow people to change their picks if we know ahead of time that a driver can't make it? It doesn't seem fair to hold people to a pick that's already been eliminated from the race. On the other hand, could people then change their picks whenever they felt like it? Tim was sceptical:

 "If you bet on

the Broncos to win the Super Bowl, then John Elway breaks his legs in

practice, the bookmakers don't allow you to change your pick nor the point

spread. Hey, if I see that Rusty Wallace isn't running very well the first

50 laps, can I change my pick? If Jeff Gordon isn't feeling as pretty as he

usually does come Sunday, can I change my pick? Nathan, only a wussboy or a

Rainbow Warrior fan would accept double points."

 I'll explain the double points reference in a second. As you can see, Tim is not in favor of changing picks under any circumstance. He also got in some shots at Gordon, always nice to see. Duncan, our newest member, also had some admonishing words for Nathan:

 "Don't be a wus. I am stickin' with Bobby. If Earnhardt can

run that one race with his rib poking through his jumpsuit,

surely Bobby can drag himself into the seat because his

shoulder is a little sore. Like Tammy Wynette, i am

standing by my man."

 I’m not sure of Duncan's spelling of "wus," but the Tammy Wynette reference really hits home. And Duncan makes a good point: injured drivers often race, even if they don't race the whole event. In fact, all the greats have driven injured. Richard Petty, the nauseator number 3, DW, and now Bobby. Just last year, Ricky Rudd raced in mid-summer in a driver's suit that wasn't cooling right. He practically died from heat prostration. He didn't, though, and he didn't pit stop and throw a tantrum. He toughed it out and won the race.

 The Verdict

 

When you make your picks, you should mean them. Even if your boy only races the first lap, you should trust him and his team to bring in a good substitute. You should expect that the car will still be awesome -- don't forget that even crummy drivers can often stay competitive if they're driving a strong car. NASCAR is a world of crazy chances, so you've got to learn to live on the edge when you make your picks.

 I was so distraught over the whole broken scapula thing that I promised people who stuck with their Labonte pick that they'd get double points if he actually did finish in the top five. If it'd been any other driver I wouldn’t have cared. This brings us to another important thing you should know: I'm about as partial and arbitrary a judge as you'll ever find. If you want consistency and fairness, go watch "Judge Judy."

 The Race, More Controversy, and the Conspiracy

 Although the number 18 car didn’t finish in the top five, Bobby and the Joe Gibbs team certainly gave a heroic performance. Bobby started the race (you have to run at least the first lap in order to collect points; once that lap is done, you can bring on a substitute), and he fought it out for 40 laps. He even stayed out while everyone else pitted, earning the five bonus points for leading a lap. His substitute Matt Kenseth then came in, and he turned in a great performance by finishing in 10th position. If there was ever any doubt as to the strength of the number 18 Pontiac car, that doubt is gone. Instead of a disastrous drop in the points standings, the combined efforts of Bobby and Matt put NASCAR’s most beloved driver only one position lower this week – he’s third in the points, behind J. Burton and Girlyman Gordon.

 Nathan S. once told me a theory he has about Gordon and his rise to stardom in NASCAR. I can’t do it justice, and I’m hoping Nathan will give us a full article explaining the peregrinations of the fiendish plot. The long and short of it is that NASCAR wants Gordon to be a superstar, so he can do for NASCAR what Jordan did for the NBA. I’d poo-pooed (anyone help me with the style rules for "poo poo"? Is it two words? One? Hyphenated?) Nathan before this race, but no more. I’m on board. Why? Read on.

 After they’d finished half the laps, past the point where they could end the race and still call it complete, it started raining again. Before the officials could get out the caution flag, there was a big old wreck. Who caused it? Our good buddy Ernie Irvan. And he did it in high fashion, folks. He collected Irwin, Sadler, Craven (all names we’ve seen in the wreck column before), J. Burton (the leader), and a touch of Gordon. Gordon wasn’t hurt too bad – just a tap, messing up the front right end. So NASCAR red-flagged the race to see if the rain would pass over. Nope, they didn’t let the drivers go around one more time under caution, didn’t let drivers race back to the start-finish line for position, didn’t let them pitstop for position. Just plain stopped ‘em dead. The positions were locked. If NASCAR had let them all go around, at full speed or at caution speed, J. Burton, who had three tires and zero engines, would’ve gone to last place. Joining him, or at least losing a bunch of positions, would’ve been the rainbow boy.

 But no, NASCAR red-flagged the race right there, and soon after they called it quits. You Gordon fans are going to hear about this one for the rest of the year.

 In other news, our points leader, Sean "These tar fumes are making me dizzy" F. talked some pre-race trash last week:

" i don't know what ad hominem is, but i know what the high groove

is...sean's groove. like harry gant, i'm running the high line early

to save my tires, and i'll run the high line late to make my move. i

haven't even started to use up my car yet."

Wow, looks like Sean wants to play hardball. His words didn't go unanswered, though. Tim had this response:

" Sean, every time I think you've said the dumbest thing ever, you find a way

to pull something else out of your ass."

 Such vile language, who'd have thought it from Tim "Plea bargain" S. ? I think y'all can handle it, though. Feel free to go after each other, 'cause that's what it's all about. As Duncan said last week, "If you ain't rubbin', you ain't racin'!"

 The DNF Rule

 I asked y'all last week if we should change the definition of "DNF" to mean any driver who finishes 50 or more laps behind the leader. Here's what y'all said:

 Kevin K.:
" And DNF should mean just that -- did not finish. If some driver has the tenacity to cross the finish line three hours after the official winner, Special Olympics-style, I think he's a winner too."

 William:

" Not sure about the DNF. Maybe it's a good thing and should be lots of points to actually pick a person who truly DNF or maybe have two point values: one for 50 laps back and more for a true DNF."

 Tim:

" Though I was the one who got stung, I think "DNF" should continue to mean totally knocked out."

 Nathan:

"And about the modification of the DNF

category: Maybe your definition of

"wreck" is different from mine, but

in my book any car that you can finish

a race in has not been wrecked. DNF

should require radiator fluid on the

track, missing fenders, and lots and

lots of four letter words. Remember,

Sandro: rubbin' is racin', but wreckin'

shore ain't."

 Sean:

" Your new DNF/-50 rule sounds good to me. i'm happy that SANDRO (like NASCAR) is always trying to keep the playing field level w/ rules changes."

 Dad:

"The 50 lap rule seems fine. On the other hand you seen to introduce a new

"interesting rule" each week. When will this moving target stop? "

 And finally, Ryan S., our most erudite member:

"i think its crap - a dnf is a dnf --- next thing you're gonna want to give extra

points for the prettiest color scheme or the tackiest hollywood corporate spononsorship ----high falutin bleeding hearts, liberals, and pinko commies"

 So four of the seven respondents said a DNF is a DNF. That's a majority in my book. We'll keep DNF as it is.

 Points

 It was an interesting week in the points. There were lots of votes for Dale Jarrett, Jeff Burton, Jeff Gordon, and Ward Burton. Believe it or not, there wasn't a single DNF, and no one got their surprise pick right. Still, lots of points were earned. Chris G. had a rare poor showing this week. Is he beginning a Rusty Wallace-esque decline? Nathan, conversely, had another great week. He tied with Sharon and Duncan for first place. Each of them scored an awesome 55 points. Sean was strong, ensuring his reign for one more week. There were also lots of great comments, ad hominem and otherwise, so y'all should check them out.

 People who kept their Bobby Labonte picks each got 5 bonus points for sticking with my favorite driver. William P. collected 5 points for ingratiating comments and helping me improve the web page. Kevin K. got 5 for answering a bonus question I had in my predictions (the answer was "The Jumping Frog of Calaveras County"). The totals for this week include all of those points.

 I also made a short table to give you bonus points for your final four picks. The cumulative table includes all the points you've earned this year, race points and bonus points.

 

Race 5 Points Results

Name

Points

1. Duncan

55

1. Nathan

55

1. Sharon

55

2. Sean

50

3. William

45

4. Tim

40

4. Sandro

40

5. Kevin K.

35

6. Dad

30

6. Mom

30

6. Ryan

30

7. Chris

20

7. Neil

20

 

 

 

 Not everyone put in Final Four picks. This'll really hurt you. Here's the chart for people who did make picks.

1. Kevin K.

15

1. Ryan

15

2. Mom

10

2. Nathan

10

2. William

10

2. Sharon

10

2. Neil

10

2. Dad

10

3. Chris

5

3. Sandro

5

3. Sean

5

 

Cumulative Points Standings

Name

Points Total

Position Last Week

1. Sean

245

1

2. Nathan

225

3

3. Chris

190

2

3. Sandro

190

4

4. Kevin K.

165

5

5. William

160

7

5. Sharon

160

8

6. Dad

150

6

7. Mom

145

7

7. Tim

145

 

8. Neil

135

7

9. Ryan

95

 

10. Dave H.

85

9

11. Duncan

55

 

12. Dave B.

50

10

13. Guy

45

11

 

 

 

1