Physiatrists’ Online Resource

Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Key Reference Articles


Home             PM&R Links             Topics in PM&R                  Key Reference Articles


The following are recommended as key reference articles on Spinal Cord Medicine by David Chen, MD. Click on the articles to view their abstracts.

  1. Spinal Instability as Defined by the Three-column Spine Concept in Acute Spinal Trauma. Francis Denis. Clinical Orthopedics & Related Research. No 189, Oct 1984.
  2. Definition of Complete Spinal Cord Injury. R. L. Walters, et al. Paraplegia. 29 (1991), pp 573-581.
  3. Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: Clinical Features and Functional Outcomes. Elliot Roth, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 71, Jan 1990, pp 18-23.
  4. Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. John Ditunno, et al. The New England Journal of Medicine. Feb 24, 1994, pp 550-556.
  5. Recovery of Motor Function after Spinal Cord Injury- A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial with GM-1 Ganglioside. Fred Geisler, et al. The New England Journal of Medicine. Vol 324, No 26, June 27, 1991, pp 1829-1838.
  6. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Michael Bracken, et al. The New England Journal of Medicine. Vol 322, No 20, May 17, 1990, pp1405-1411.
  7. New Approaches in the Rehabilitation of the Traumatic High Level Quadriplegic. John Bach. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 70, No 1, Feb 1991, pp 13-19.
  8. Autonomic Hyperreflexia: Pathophysiology and Medical Management. Rolland Erickson. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 61, Oct 1980, pp431-440.
  9. The Respiratory System in Spinal Cord Injury. Indira Lanig, et al. Phys Med and Rehabil Clinics of North America. Vol 3 No 4, Nov 1992, pp 725-740.
  10. Management of Spasticity. Richard Katz. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. pp 108-116.
  11. Etilogy, Incidence and Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Geno Merli, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 74, Nov 1993, pp1199-1205.
  12. Pressure Ulcers in Community-Resident Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Marcus Fuhrer, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 74, Nov 1993, pp1172-1177.
  13. Aging Issues in Spinal Cord Injured Patients. Abraham Ohry, et al. Critical Reviews in Phys & Rehabil Med. 4 (1.2):27-35 (1992).
  14. Infertility in Men with Spinal Cord Injury. Todd Linsenmeyer, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Vol 72, Sept 1991, pp 747-754.
  15. Sexual Issues of Women with Spinal Cord Injury. S. W. Charlifue, et al. Paraplegia 30 (1992) 192-199.

Back to PM&R Key Articles


Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma.

Denis F - Clin Orthop - 1984 Oct; (189): 65-76

Full Source Title: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Authors: Denis F

Abstract: This article is a presentation of the concept of the three-column spine. The concept evolved from a retrospective review of 412 thoracolumbar spine injuries and observations on spinal instability. The posterior column consists of what Holdsworth described as the posterior ligamentous complex. The middle column includes the posterior longitudinal ligament, posterior annulus fibrosus, and posterior wall of the vertebral body. The anterior column consists of the anterior vertebral body, anterior annulus fibrosus, and anterior longitudinal ligament. Major spinal injuries are classified into four different categories, all definable in terms of the degree of involvement of each of the three columns. Each type is defined also in terms of its pathomechanics, roentgenograms, and computerized axial tomograms, as well as in terms of its particular stability. The compression fracture is basically stress failure of the anterior column with an intact middle column. The burst fracture indicates failure under compression of both the anterior and middle columns. The seat-belt-type spinal fracture is the result of failure of the posterior and middle columns under tension with an intact anterior hinge. In fracture-dislocations, the structure of all three columns fails from forces acting to various degrees from one or another direction.

Back to top

Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes.

Roth EJ - Arch Phys Med Rehabil - 1990 Jan; 71(1): 18-23

Full Source Title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Author Affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Northwestern University Medical

School, Chicago, IL.

Authors: Roth EJ; Lawler MH; Yarkony GM

Abstract:

This retrospective study examined clinical features of 81 rehabilitated patients with traumatic central cord syndrome and identified factors which predicted more favorable rehabilitation outcomes. The sample had two age peaks and a mean age of 46 years. Most injuries were caused by vehicular accidents, but falls were more common among older persons. Predominant upper extremity weakness was proximal in 4%, distal in 36%, and generalized in the remainder. Forty-one percent also had significant lower limb weakness. More than 90% of the patients experienced neurologic recovery of upper and/or lower limb strength. After an average acute hospitalization of 30 days and a mean rehabilitation stay of 70 days, most patients performed each of 14 functional skills independently, 84% had bladder continence, and 89% were discharged home. Statistically significant improvements were noted for mean Modified Barthel Index scores between rehabilitation admission and discharge. Favorable rehabilitation outcomes were associated most frequently with younger age, preinjury employment, absence of lower extremity impairment on admission, and documented upper or lower extremity strength recovery during rehabilitation. Central cord syndrome generally has a good prognosis for neurologic and functional improvement during rehabilitation.

Back to top

Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside

[published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1659-60] [see comments]

Geisler FH - N Engl J Med - 1991 Jun 27; 324(26): 1829-38

Comment: N Engl J Med 1991 Jun 27;324(26):1885-7; N Engl J Med 1992 Feb 13;326(7):493; discussion 494; N Engl J Med 1992 Sep 3;327(10):735-6

Full Source Title: New England Journal of Medicine

Author Affiliation: Shock Trauma Center, Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services

Systems, Baltimore.

Authors: Geisler FH; Dorsey FC; Coleman WP

Abstract: BACKGROUND. Spinal-cord injury is devastating; until recently, there was no medical treatment to improve recovery of the initial neurologic deficit. Studies in animals have shown that monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM-1) ganglioside enhances the functional recovery of damaged neurons. METHODS. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of GM-1 ganglioside was conducted in patients with spinal-cord injuries. Of 37 patients entered into the study, 34 (23 with cervical injuries and 11 with thoracic injuries) completed the test-drug protocol (100 mg of GM-1 sodium salt or placebo intravenously per day for 18 to 32 doses, with the first dose taken within 72 hours of the injury) and a one-year follow-up period. Neurologic recovery was assessed with the Frankel scale (comprising five categories) and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (a scale of scores from 0 to 100, derived from strength tests of 20 specific muscles, each scored from 0 to 5). RESULTS. There was a significant difference between groups in the distribution of improvement of Frankel grades from base line to the one-year follow-up (improvement of 0, 1, 2, and 3 grades in 13, 4, 1, and 0 patients, respectively, in the placebo group and 8, 1, 6, and 1 patients, respectively, in the GM-1 group; P = 0.034 by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test). The GM-1-treated patients also had a significantly greater mean improvement in ASIA motor score from base line to the one-year follow-up than the placebo-treated patients (36.9 vs. 21.6 points; P = 0.047 by analysis of covariance with the base-line ASIA motor score as the covariate). An analysis of individual muscle recoveries revealed that the increased recovery in the GM-1 group was attributable to initially paralyzed muscles that regained useful motor strength rather than to strengthening of paretic muscles. CONCLUSIONS. This small study provides evidence that GM-1 enhances the recovery of neurologic function after one year. A larger study must be conducted, however, before GM-1 is considered efficacious and safe in treating spinal-cord injury.

Back to top

A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study [see comments]

Bracken MB - N Engl J Med - 1990 May 17; 322(20): 1405-11

Comment: N Engl J Med 1990 May 17;322(20):1459-61; N Engl J Med 1990 Oct 25;323(17):1207-9

Full Source Title: New England Journal of Medicine

Author Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of

Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

Authors: Bracken MB; Shepard MJ; Collins WF; Holford TR; Young W; Baskin DS;

Eisenberg HM; Flamm E; Leo-Summers L; Maroon J; et al

Abstract: Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurological examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury. After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups. We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury.

Back to top

New approaches in the rehabilitation of the traumatic high level quadriplegic.

Bach JR - Am J Phys Med Rehabil - 1991 Feb; 70(1): 13-9

Full Source Title: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Author Affiliation: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, New Jersey

Medical School-UMDNJ, Newark.

Authors: Bach JR

Abstract: The use of noninvasive alternatives to tracheostomy for ventilatory support have been described in the patient management of various neuromuscular disorders. The use of these techniques for patients with traumatic high level quadriplegia, however, is hampered by the resort to tracheostomy in the acute hospital setting. Twenty traumatic high level quadriplegic patients on intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) via tracheostomy with little or no ability for unassisted breathing were converted to noninvasive ventilatory support methods and had their tracheostomy sites closed. Four additional patients were ventilated by noninvasive methods without tracheostomy. These methods included the use of body ventilators and the noninvasive intermittent positive airway pressure alternatives of IPPV via the mouth, nose, or custom acrylic strapless oral-nasal interface (SONI). Overnight end-tidal pCO2 studies and monitoring of oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2) were used to adjust ventilator volumes and to document effective ventilation during sleep. No significant complications have resulted from the use of these methods over a period of 45 patient-years. Elimination of the tracheostomy permitted significant free time by glossopharyngeal breathing for four patients, two of whom had no measurable vital capacity. We conclude that noninvasive ventilatory support alternatives can be effective and deserve further study in this patient population.

Back to top

Autonomic hyperreflexia: pathophysiology and medical management.

Erickson RP - Arch Phys Med Rehabil - 1980 Oct; 61(10): 431-40

Full Source Title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Authors: Erickson RP

Abstract: Integral to the successful rehabilitation of patients with myelopathies is the prompt and proper management of autonomic hyperreflexia. More than 80% of tetraplegic and high paraplegic patients experience this syndrome of disordered autonomic homeostasis during their rehabilitation. Successful prevention and management require a clear understanding of the pathophysiology, aided in particular by recent clarification of catecholamine activity in spinal man. Prevention is accomplished through optimal general medical care, as well as proper bladder, bowel and skin management. Treatment of the acute episode requires prompt identification and removal of the offending stimulus, and occasionally the administration of a potent direct vasodilator (diazoxide, nitroprusside). Recurrent episodes are approached through definitive management of the primary problem provoking the stimulus, accompanied by symptomatic prevention of the syndrome (mecamylamine, phenoxybenzamine).

Back to top

Etiology, incidence, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis in acute spinal cord injury.

Merli GJ - Arch Phys Med Rehabil - 1993 Nov; 74(11): 1199-205

Full Source Title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Author Affiliation: Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia,

PA 19107.

Authors: Merli GJ; Crabbe S; Paluzzi RG; Fritz D

Abstract: This article provides a critical review of the literature on the etiology, incidence, and prevention of deep-vein thrombosis in acute spinal cord injured patients. Stasis and hypercoagulability are the two major factors contributing to the development of thrombosis in this patient population. This has been supported by studies that demonstrate an impaired venous return from the lower extremities and abnormal coagulation factors, which predispose to thrombogenesis. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis secondary to the above etiologies varies from 49% to 100% in the first 12 weeks with the first 2 weeks having the highest rate following acute injury. This high rate of complication has led to numerous studies to identify the most effective regimens of prophylaxis. Studies using noninvasive testing and venography in acute spinal cord injury have supported two approaches for preventing deep-vein thrombosis. Single agent pharmacologic therapy with adjusted dose heparin is effective but does carry some risk of bleeding. Combination therapy with external pneumatic compression sleeves plus either aspirin/dipyridamole or low-dose heparin and electrical stimulation plus low-dose heparin have significantly reduced the incidence of deep vein thrombosis. The duration of prophylaxis with the above modalities has varied between 8 and 12 weeks following acute injury. Further large scale studies are required in this high-risk population to better delineate the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, to identify the best modalities, and to define the duration of treatment for the prevention of these complications.

Back to top

Back to PM&R Key Articles

Home       PM&R Links       Topics in PM&R       PM&R Key Reference Articles

 


 

1