Mr. Dennis Pfrimmer, MSW, Concluded in his recommendations:

         
AXIS 1.     Rule out Depression and Bipolar Disorder.
AXIS 11.    Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Antisocial Traits.
AXIS 111.   Deferred.

    
    Conclusion:

    "I believe he (Merlyn Schutterle) is intelligent, consumed with his 
    past, fanatical in his denial, irrational in his sense of justice, Self
    defeating in his problem solving, manipulative to the point of being a 
    martyr and is exhilarated by "the game." I believe these qualities add 
    to his potential dangerousness. His public statements warning parents
    and taunting of the authorities concerns me that Merlyn's state of mind 
    could lead him well beyond sexual perpetration to the point of harming
    someone purely for the 'thrill of the chase'."
 
    Pfrimmer is anxious to sell his beliefs to the state who is paying for
    his opinion. He will not disappoint them. At least he does address the 
    sex problem, but offers no recommendations. The big problem with the 
    sexual accusation is that it is taken from Lee Pfeiffer's evaluation
    which has already been discredited. They are beginning to believe each
    other's paranoia.
     
    Antisocial traits means I was angry, had been abused and harassed and 
    was not in the mood to suck up to them just because they had a license 
    to witch hunt. When they encounter anyone who is angry, they reach in 
    their bag of drugs to drug the problem into submission.  Anytime you 
    have psychologists involved in a political problem, you have big trouble.
    I thought they gave up the practice of placing political dissenters in 
    mental institutions long ago, but with Janklow, it is still a practice 
    in South Dakota.

    I later went to see Dennis Pfrimmer to give him a piece of my mind. When 
    I walked up to him he was high on his own ego. He had that gooey, self 
    assurance, phschologist hype attitude and offered his hand as though I 
    was desperate and he was the savior to my existance. I didn't shake his 
    hand. I began to question him and tried to get him to defend what he had 
    written. He immediately became defensive and accused me of threatening 
    him. That is the psychologist's defense position. They never have to 
    answer or defend anything. They just sell opinions. That is all they have
    to justify their existence, all they have to charge for.

    So, Pfrimmer has issued his opinion of me, and I have my opinion of him.
    He is a non problem solver in a position of power. He basically believes 
    his opinion,without fact, is suffient to cause personal grief to others 
    without any  responsibility on his part. Simply, a wreckless bone head.

    Notice Pfrimmer and Dame came to the oposite conclusion. Dame said I was 
    bipolar, and Pfrimmer rejected it. So who, if anybody, is correct? in later 
    evaluations none of these opinions held up. See Dr. Bean's comments.