Tài liệu của Việt Nam
Human Rights Watch
Tác Phẩm của

 Hà Thúc Sinh
Thơ


Ðại Học Máu

Vài Truyện Ngắn

Tống Biệt Hai Mươi

Kịch một cảnh ba màn: 
Quyền Của Lửa

Hội Luận Nhà Văn Quốc Tế
July 01-1999

Liên lạc:

Vietnam Human Rights Watch
P.O. Box 578
Midway City, CA. 92655, USA



 

FIFTY YEARS of VIOLATIONS
of Human Rights in Communist Vietnam
1945-1995

CHAPTER VIII

LIFE IN PRISONS AND REEDUCATION CAMPS

Statistics on Deaths at Camps

Witnesses reported cases of execution and death of the military and civilian personnel of the old Republic of South Vietnam at camps and political prisoners after the Communist takeover of South Vietnam. The Vietnamese Federation of Veteran Political Prisoners (1995) has compiled 718 cases of executions and deaths at camp. Although the causes of death were not specified, in most cases, statistics show: 165 (22.98%) of 718 prisoners were reportedly executed at camp; 72 (10%) died as a result of hard labor and lack of medical treatment or of cold and starvation; 31 (4.31%) committed suicide; 33 (4.59%) were murdered or tortured to death; and 24 (3.62%) died soon after release from camp.

Among those prisoners who died for unspecified reasons were Prof. Vo Van Hai; Trinh Quoc Khanh, dignitary of Hoa Hao Buddhism; Sen. Tran The Minh; Ta Nguyen Minh, Leader of the Dai Viet Quoc Gia Xa Hoi (Greater Vietnam National Social Party); Phan Ba Cam, Secretary General of the Vietnam Dan Xa Dang (Vietnam Democratic Social Party); Congressman Bui Minh Nghia; Lieutenant General Lam Thanh Nguyen; Hon. Nguyen Manh Nhu, Presiding Judge of the Court of Appeal; Sen. Son Thai Nguyen; Major General Doan Van Quang; Lawyer Tran Van Tuyen; Catholic Priest Nguyen Quang Minh; Hon. Nguyen Ba Luong, Chairman, the House of Representatives; Hon. Vu Tien Tuan, Presiding Judge of the Supreme Court; Rev. Nguyen Van Thang of the Evangelical Church; Hon. Duong Duc Thuy, Secretary of Justice; and Dinh Van Bien, member of the Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang (Vietnam Koumintang).

Among those prisoners who were executed without trial were Tran Thanh Dinh, member of the Duy Dan Party (Vietnam National Party); Colonel Ho Ngoc Can, Province Chief of Chuong Thien; Le Quang Cho, Village Chief; Doan Van Chau, Rural Restitution Cadre; Lieutenant Colonel Duong, National Police; Captain Dot, Company Commander, Regional Force; Councilman Hieu of Kien Hoa Province; Lawyer Nguyen Van Huyen; Nguyen Van Nghiem, Leader, National Restoration Forces; Vo Van Nghi, Member, National Front for the Liberation of Vietnam; Tran Quang Pho, Civilian; Lieutenant Colonel Le Chon Tinh of Hoa Hao Buddhism; Nguyen Duy Tam, Canton Chief; Master Sergeant Thai Van Ut; Major Nguyen Duc Xich, Deputy Chief of Bien Hoa Province; Pham Hong Ung, Village Chief; First Lieutenant Nguyen Ngoc Thanh; Nguyen Van Sang, Cadre, Open Arm and Information Service; and Vo Thanh Nhon, Village Chief.

Among those prisoners who died as a result of hard labor, lack of medical treatment or of cold and starvation were Colonel Pham Van Son, Historian; Lieutenant Colonel Doan Van Anh; Captain Nguyen Van Chuong; First Lieutenant Le Quy Ky; Lieutenant Colonel Nguyen Van Nam; Nguyen Dang Bai, Vice District Chief; Colonel Chung Van Bong; Lieutenant Colonel Doan Van Anh; First Lieutenant Do Rang Dong; Second Lieutenant Nguyen Tan Hoang; Lieutenant Colonel Nguyen Tran Louis; Lieutenant Colonel Ha Hau Sinh; Colonel Le Van Tho; Colonel Lu Phung Van; Hoang Kim Quy, Businessman; Colonel Pham Ngoc Loi; Colonel Pham Nhu Hien; Nguyen Dang Bao, Village Chief; Pham Ngoc Thanh, Administrator; Ngo Ngoc Loi, Government Official; Colonel Dang Quang Tiep; and First Lieutenant Tran Duc Quan.

Among those prisoners who were murdered or tortured to death were Lieutenant Colonel Vo Vang, Regiment Commander, Regiment 911; Nguyen Duc Diep, Sculptor; Minh Ky, Musician; Captain Tien of the Signal Corps; Colonel Dang Van Thanh, Regiment Commander, Infantry Division 21; Captain Tran Van Thang of the National Police; Captain Mao; Le Quang Lac; Major Le Thom; Congressman Dang van Tiep; Doan Van Xuong; Captain Tran Canh Dien; Captain Kha, M.D.; Colonel Dang Van Thanh; Bao Trong, Assistant to the Commander, National Police; Captain Tran Van Thang; Lieutenant Colonel Nguyen Van Thanh; Captain Nguyen Van Tho; Captain Nguyen Duc Tho; Lieutenant Nguyen Hong Viet alias Paul; and Lieutenant Colonel Sam.

Prisons and Camps

There are hundreds of prisons, camps, and sub-camps in each city and province throughout the country. Among the most infamous detention camps and prisons are: Quyet Tien Camp in Hoang Lien Son Province; Thanh Liet (B4) in Ha Son Binh Province; Nam Ha (Ba Sao), in Ha Nam Ninh Province; Thanh Phong (K1, K2), Thanh Lam (K3), Thanh Cam (K4), Thanh Son (K5) in Thanh Hoa Province, Gia Trung, Pleibong (T15) in Lam Dong Province; Xuan Phuoc (A20) in Phu Yen Province; Phu Khanh (A30); Ham Tan (Z30C, Z30D) in Thuan Hai Province, and Chi Hoa and Phan Dang Luu prisons in Saigon.

Not only do former prisons remain in use, but also new ones have been constructed and other buildings transformed to hold the growing number of prisoners. Camp A20 in Xuan Phuoc (Phu Yen Province), for instance, was divided into eight separate sections: one building was demolished to be enlarged. One building was used as a warehouse and clinics. Six remaining sections housed an average of 80 people each, allowing approximately 70 square centimeters per person. Phan Dang Luu prison in Saigon, under the Thieu regime, held 200 prisoners. It now has 2,000 prisoners behind its walls. Prisoners are classified into the most fortunate, the less fortunate, and the least fortunate. The most fortunate are housed in cells built by the French more than 30 years ago, measuring 20 meters long by 5 meters wide, with a ceiling of 6 meters high. The front and back of the cells are fitted with bars allowing the circulation of air. The prisoners have their own water supply. Under the former regime, these cells contained 20-25 prisoners each. Today, 60-70 prisoners are crammed into each cell. There are eight such cells, which form Zone A of the prison. The less fortunate are held in newly constructed zones C1, C2, and B, built in October 1965 by the [Republic of Vietnam] Secret Police. Each cell measures 8 meters in length, 5 meters in width, and 3.50 meters in height. The ceiling is only a sheet of corrugated iron, creating an unbearable temperature. All sides are blocked, and the only air supply for all 30-40 prisoners comes from an air vent in the wall measuring 10 cm x 15 cm. There is no water supply. The least fortunate are thrown into dungeons which measure 2m long, 1m width, and 2 m height. The only air hole measures 10 cm x 15 cm. Prisoners are kept handcuffed with the left foot attached to the left hand. These cells are reserved for new arrivals and for those who have committed some breach in discipline (Washington Area League for Human Rights, 1978: 17).

Dang Chi Binh related how he suffered from the lack of air in a tight cell when he was detained at Hoa Lo prison (Hanoi Hilton):

One of the most unsuspected impediment I have to overcome now is ... the lack of air. Before, I was never sick due to physical exercise, and air was the main remedy. I was hungry because of the lack of rice, but I still had sane air for compensation. Here, they don't prevent air from coming in, but it is polluted. A foul smell is much more harmful. The more we breath it in, the faster we will have the chance to say farewell to this world. This is a serious problem. I tried hard to solve it, but I could not find a solution (Dang Chi Binh, 1987: 93). Camp Measures

There are no official statistics on the political prisoner population. Estimates vary from hundred to ten thousand. Veteran political prisoner Nhat Tran reported that there are different measures on criminals and political prisoners. In the South, while being detained for interrogations, criminals are confined in separate cells. Criminals' lives are not respected. However, they are not strictly controlled since they are not politically dangerous to the regime. Officials and officers of the Republic of Vietnam were detained under the surveillance of the Communist troops. Many members of political parties who did not report themselves with the Communist military authorities were arrested, charged on grounds of counterrevolutionaries, and detained under the supervision of the security police. These prisoners were strictly controlled--their thoughts as well as their ways of thinking (Nguyen Tri, 14 (December 1992)).

Political prisoner Pham Van Thanh reported that at A20 Camp, the prisoner population, at present, was 500, including 200 political prisoners. Among these prisoners are: the Reverend Dinh Van Hieu; Nguyen Dac Chuong, Buddhist monks Thich Tue Sy Pham Van Thuong, Le Hien, and Ho Huu Tin; and the Reverend Le Hoan Son. Other personalities are: Nguyen Van De, Caodaist Ho Huu Khanh, and Professor Doan Viet Hoat. There are also overseas Vietnamese: Ly Tong, Tran Manh Quynh (simultaneously transferred with Professor Doan Viet Hoat and seven others), Peter Tran Vu, Vann Nelson Do Huon, Michael Nguyen Van Muon, Do Hang Van, Pham Duc Hau from the United States, Nguyen Ngoc Dang from Canada, Nguyen Nghiep (released with ten other prisoners from Thailand) from Germany, Pierre Pham Anh Dung, Le Hoan Son, and Pham Van Thanh from France. Sixty percent of the political prisoners at Camp A20 were sentenced to 15 years in prison or more (Pham Van Thanh, 1994).

Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, Tran Manh Quynh, and Ly Tong reported from Z30D in Ham Tan that criminals and political prisoners of all backgrounds, including priests and intellectuals, are detained together and bear the same policy regarding daily activities and labor. This is a common practice in almost all prisons. This policy leads to many negative effects and is detrimental to the reeducation of the prisoners. Human dignity, morale, and social behavior are not enhanced but decayed. People of dignity are penalized by acts of violence of cruel criminals. These people are used to the life of the "black society." Since there are too many prisoners, the living space is overcrowded (50 cm x 60 cm per person). The hygiene standard is very low, and personal safety is not guaranteed--theft, fight, robbery (Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, Tran Manh Quynh and Ly Tong, 1994).

Tran Manh Quynh reported that at Camp Z30D (Ham Tan, Binh Thuan) he was put among a group of criminals under strict restriction. This was a group of murderers and thieves sentenced to at least 10 years in prison. All of them were ferocious pirates and notorious cadres of the most dangerous elements of the society, and he was the only political prisoners in the group (Tran Manh Quynh, 1994).

Alimentary Deficiency

Veteran political prisoner Buu Lich reported that after a few months under detention, alimentary deficiency became critical. Camp detainees saw their health alarmingly deteriorating while they were subject to forced hard labor. In the beginning, their monthly food apportions were 18 kgs of rice, but it was gradually reduced to 15 kgs, then to 12 kgs, and then to 8 kgs, and sometimes none. That is, rice was lacking in the ration and was compensated by manioc, sweet potato, flour, or barley. All these foods were of the worst quality. Sweet potatoes were rotten. Rice was moth-eaten, and one cooked it with worms hidden in the rice. The only sauce that went with it was a kind of fish sauce which was, in fact, water with dark salt. The detainee had a right to a small quantity of vegetable a day, a piece of fish of a thumb size a week, and a piece of meat of the same size bi-weekly or even a month. However, meat was too expensive to be replaced by other produce. In the beginning, when the "scraps" left over during the American-created puppet government were not yet exhausted, there was still sugar, and four people shared a small box a month. Fish and meat became a luxury; and they were always saved and boiled over many times to make soup. The craving for sugar was a torture. How could detainees have survived with such a food ration? They survived on their relatives' packages of food after a year under detention (Buu Lich, 1984: 4).

Ho N. reported that at Suoi Mau Camp (Bien Hoa Province, South Vietnam), during the years of 1975-76, camp detainees were only fed with decayed rice brought from secret zones in the jungle. That was the kind of rice the Communists stored in caves during the Vietnam War. It floats when soaked in water and is without nutrient (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)).

Dinh Phu lamented:

I'm a Caodaist. I have faith in Cao Dai Almighty. It was the faith in him that helped me brave difficulties, starvation, sufferings, and shame during the years in camps. It was also brotherhood that we shared among officers and officials of the Republic of South Vietnam that had enabled me to survive until the day I was released. My wife died while I was in camp. No one came to see me, and no one sent me a bit of food or a capsule of medicine. The Almighty bestowed on me courage, and friends came to help. There were times when hunger and illness tortured me, excruciating my stomach and mind with starvation and death! An excruciating hunger that deprives you of reasoning and personality. I witnessed six camp detainees who could not resist hunger and died from eating wild fruit. Death could happen to you anytime and in many ways you just don't know when and how. I can still see in my mind the ugly, haunted cart that carried corpses of camp detainees who died of hunger and illness across the camp every night (Van Chuong, 11 (July 1992)). Hoang Xuan Hao reported that the prisoners were so hungry that they would eat whatever they thought they could. Many prisoners became seriously sick from consuming pestiferous plants or foods. There was no medicine for treatment. Because of this, the number of prisoners declined. We were all so hungry that we looked for any insects that we knew were not poisonous or any plants that were digestible and ate them. Some criminals even ate indigestible vomituss of sick people. They unearthed diseased hog for food and devoured vegetables that were still fresh with humane urine and excrement. (Hoang Xuan Hao, Thuc Trang Viet Nam, 1993)

Pham Quoc Bao described how hunger tortured the camp prisoners and how it drove him into insanity:

One day, the family of a cook, who was an insane northern Communist invalid detained there, came to visit him and gave him some gifts. There was a jackfruit among it. He cleaved it into halves, had his friends share one half. He gave one-fourth of it to the camp nurses and hid the remaining piece to give to us in secret so that we could have a little share just for a flavor. A moment later, he came back to our room and talked with us about his family. Right at that moment, a nurse from the criminals' dispensary came by. The cook suddenly asked the visitor:

-- Eh! Did you throw away the jackfruit hull?

-- Yes.

-- Where did you throw it?

-- Well, in the urine pail ...

-- Damn it! You kill me!

Exclaiming in alarm, the cook rushed outside. It was too late, nevertheless. A sick inmate had sneaked out and had already taken several good bites of it (Pham Quoc Bao, 1985: 153).

Food Rations

Each detainee is given only one meal per day that features one bowl of rice with water and salt, and without further supply. This cruel prescription did indeed kill Father Nguyen Quang Minh (Catholic St. Vincent Order). Father Nguyen Luan, Father Nguyen Van Vang, among numerous others. These priests died between 1985 and mid-1986 for their unyielding courage against the authorities of the Ministry for the Interior.

Vo Dai Ton related that the inmates at Thanh Liet camp were classified into categories. Their food rations varied according to their health conditions and whether or not they were honest in their confessions. An inmate who was accorded 47 dong for food and 9 kilograms of rice per month was given a bowl of cooked rice and plain soup from boiled vegetable daily. An inmate who was accorded 60 dong for food and 12 kilograms of rice per month was given more than one bowl of rice, a few blades of vegetable, some soup of boiled vegetable daily, and a mince of meat monthly. An inmate who was accorded 120 dong for food and 15 kilograms of rice per month was given 2 bowls of rice, a few blades of vegetable, some water of boiled vegetable daily, and 2 minces of meat monthly. An inmate who was accorded 180 dong and 15 kilograms of rice per month was given 2 bowls of rice and boiled vegetable daily, and 3 minces of meat monthly (Vo Dai Ton, 1993: 174).

Pham Van Thanh reported from A20 Camp (Xuan Phuoc, Phu Yen Province) that each inmate was allotted a portion of meat of 300 grs (!) monthly. He wrote:

Our lives in this camp were utterly woeful. Prisoners were subject to forced labor from 6:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. with all the hard work under the sun and in the rain. We were always in want of food. Without help from the family, a prisoner only had 12 kilograms of rice a month and salt water (in principle, each prisoner was supplied with 15 kilograms of rice a month). It was in this situation that cruel fights among criminals occurred almost daily. There were 39 to 40 political prisoners, including our two groups in this camp (Pham Van Thanh, 1993). Labor Exploitation

Ta Ty gave a description of how man and animal labored at camp:

The water-buffalo with two long curved horns dully followed the laborer. Hardly had the animal seen the ground, it bolted up and tried to break loose. The laborer tried to hold the rope fast to control it, but he could not hold it long. Another laborer lashed out at it, driving it into the ground. The animal jumped up, pushing the laborer onto the ground... It ran across a small stream and into the bushes at the foot of the tea-growing hill.

-- Not only man, water-buffalos are also scared of labor! (Ta Ty, 1985: 468).

Living scenes as such also exist in accounts, stories, and memoirs of Ha Thuc Sinh, Dang Chi Binh, and Pham Quoc Bao, or interviews with veteran political prisoners. They denounced the savage treatment that cannot be found in famous stories about the lives in camps and prisons by international authors such as Dickens, Dotoevsky, Stendhal Georghiu, Chariere, Solzhenitsyn, Silvio Pellico, Bevenuto Cellini, ... Why? The reason is simple: The wardens in those camps and prisons still have in them an innate sense of human love. The Vietnamese Communist wardens, quite inhumanely, treat their defeated adversaries in the eyes of hatred; they are a special instrument that the Communist party produces and manipulates to trample underfoot those who are charged with such crimes as "traitors and counterrevolutionaries." The prisoner is treated as equally as an animal. And, being an animal-man, he must labor and produce under a special regime of labor corresponding to his "class of animals (Thien Chuong, 1995)."

Buu Lich related that at Xuan Loc Camp, every day the reeducated went to work in the forest 15 kilometers from the camp to gather firewood. The weight that each of them had to gather was 20 kgs (the middle-sized Vietnamese weighs 45 kgs). With rudimentary tools--saws, billhooks, hatchets made by their own hands--the reeducated experienced much difficulty and were more prone to accidents. One day, a tree trunk fell on a prisoner. Everyone hurried to crowd around him. The cadres remained quite impassive. The reeducated proposed that the victim be taken back to camp, but the proposal was ignored. The victim remained lying there unattended. About five or six hours later, he was transported on the back of his friends. The result was foreseeable: he was dying and expired his last breath on the way back to the camp (Buu Lich, 1986: 7).

Truong Ngoc said:

Prisoners were summoned to reeducation camps for brainwashing. They were prisoners of war but, in reality, they weren't treated as prisoners of war. The Communists say that 'one gains accordingly from one's labor,' but prisoners exhausted their labor and weren't given in return the minimum amount of food they desperately needed. The Communists maliciously starved prisoners. Their purpose was to force prisoners to do nothing but think about food. Many prisoners were so hungry that they would eat whatever living things they could find (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)). Pham Sy said: The Communists set up standards for different categories of forced labor according to the Communist motto, 'one gains accordingly from one's labor.' A prisoner under separate confinement was given 2 kgs of rice per month. A light forced laborer was given 4kgs of rice per month; a normal laborer, 6kgs of rice per month; and a labor hand with a special skill, such as a carpenter or brick layer, 8 kgs of rice per month. The rations of rice were later replaced with manioc, maize, or sweet potatoes of the same quantity (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)). Pham Van Thanh reported that at A20 Camp in Xuan Phuoc, Phu Yen, as a case in evidence, the prisoners' labor is exploited to the maximum to profit a small group of prison officials. A good example is the bricks work crew where each crew member is expected to produce 1,400 bricks. These bricks are sold outside at a retail price of 14,000 dong for 1,000 bricks. Nevertheless, the crew member only receives 30,000 dong a month. If he is sick for a day, 1,300 dong are deducted. Each month, the crew deposits one million dong with the overseer out of the average receipts of four million dong per month. The remaining three million go to the 'quan giao' (camp custodian) personally. This is the worst work duty in the prison. The situation of the carpentry crew and the agricultural crew is also to line the pockets of a small number of overseers or 'quan giao,' while no attention is paid to the health of the prisoners. Besides the time spent on work for the prison, the forestry and agricultural crews have to hold private jobs for the 'quan giao' officer, or the 'quan giao' officer sends the individuals out to private individuals outside the prison and pockets one hundred percent of the payment (Pham Van Thanh, 1993).

Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, Tran Manh Quynh, and Ly Tong, in their letter of protest to the Vietnamese Communist leadership on March 1, 1994, denounced that the current form of organized labor and its intensive coercion in the labor camps they have lived through are totally intended for punishment and financial gain. In each camp, the result of prisoner's labor is calculated as if it were in a commercial company. At Nam Ha Camp, prisoners are outright assigned the duty of "making the camp rich." This condition leads to harmful results. Prisoners always have the feeling of being exploited. In addition, the miserable living conditions in the camp further derails the effort to educate the prisoners. They believed that the way labor is organized as well as the living conditions in the camps today fail to achieve the "reeducating" effect it is intended for. Forcing hard labor on the prisoners for financial gains of the camp and contribution to the government's operation budget create a bad image of the country and prison policy. Laboring during the detention only earns its value when it benefits the prisoners. To achieve those purposes, labor must be accompanying vocation, learning to elevate knowledge, and general literacy must be accompanied with a living environment that reflects humanity, civilization, and progress. This requires an overhaul of the policy on labor and education as well as positive improvement on activity in the camp.

Health Care--Medical Treatment

Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, Tran Manh Quynh, and Ly Tong reported:

The health of the prisoners is not protected. Prisoners perform hard labor, but the supplies for clothing, living space, and resting time are below standard. When sick, there lacks medicine. The clinics are often overcrowded and unclean. Patients with light sickness are put together with contagious patients. The human relationship in the prisons lacks sympathy and cultivation. The language used by the cadres toward the prisoners is usually rude and harsh. There are many cases where cadres beat prisoners using canes and rods, forcing the prisoners to serve them (Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, Tran Manh Quynh, and Ly Tong, 1994). Doan Viet Hoat's relatives, in particular, informed that he constantly has pain in his back but is forced to work in the field all day long. He is severely myopic but has never been given an eye examination. He is not permitted to replace his old eye glasses which have become unfit for the weakness of his eyesight due to malnutrition and long period of imprisonment. It is worthy to note that Doan and his associates in the Forum Freedom, Pham Duc Kham and Vuong Duc Le, were deported from Camp Z30 in Ham Tan, South Vietnam to Xuan Phuoc Labor camp in Phu Yen province, Central Vietnam. The location is a remote mountainous area, about 700 kilometers north of Saigon.

On August 10, 1994, Jackie Manthorne, executive director of the Canadian Center International PEN, wrote to Hanoi Ambassador Le Van Bang at the United Nations urging the Communist government of Vietnam to release the seriously ill political prisoner Nguyen Van Thuan. According to the director, Nguyen Van Thuan was arrested in 1990 when he returned to Vietnam from Canada to promote democracy. At the age 60 and after serving an 18-year prison sentence in hard labor camps, he suffered a stroke. He was then temporarily returned to the care of his family. However, Vietnam's authority said he would be taken back to prison camp later. Upon the news of Nguyen Van Thuan being returned to Ham Tan labor camp in the last week of September while he was still very ill, PEN Canada, an international association of writers, on October 1, wrote to Raymond Chan (Secretary of State, Asia Pacific, House of Parliament, Ottawa, Canada) urging the Canadian official to intervene for Nguyen Van Thuan's release. Following, in an excerpt of the letter, the organization feared that by returning Nguyen Van Thuan to the labor camp where he suffered his first stroke, his health and perhaps his life, would be placed in extreme jeopardy. There was then no way of knowing whether he would be receiving adequate medical care or forced to perform physical labor.

Illness

According to Buu Lich, illness was the natural consequence of starvation. Besides, inmates usually become ill secondary to exposure to the unhygienic environment in the camp. The most common illnesses were ascites and edema of the extremities due to lack of nutrition, dysentery, diarrhea, and malaria. The camp did not supply any medicine, and the detainees only relied on the medicine they might have brought with them. However, they had register them with the camp office and could only have it every time they needed to use it. They had to apply for it with a written form.

Each camp had a dispensary. Sick detainees had a little better food ration and were excused from work and services. The health personnel obviously had a competence far inferior to the nurses of the old Republic of Vietnam. The following story would give the reader an idea about the professional knowledge of the North Vietnam medical personnel. One member of the medical team trustingly said to his friend: "You have to learn constantly, to quest for progress as Uncle Ho advised. Take me as an example! I am a medical doctor; still, I continue to study. I am attending an in-training cultural course at the 7th grade level(!). Under these situations, the most common illnesses such as influenza and diarrhea might cause death.

Illnesses did not constitute a motive to return the reeducated home. Many sick camp detainees who were at the point of death were returned home. They died after reaching home. There were many reasons to explain these cases of death: hatred and revenge, ineffective administrative formalities for final decision, cadres' authority at camp, their irresponsibilities (Buu Lich, 1984: 6-7).

Punishment

Bruce Stanley of the Associated Press, on September 28, 1994, reported:

Political prisoners at a Vietnamese detention camp are beaten by guards, denied medical care, and forced to survive on a diet of rice and salt. The Vietnam Committee on Human Rights, based in Gennevilliers, France, quoted a document reportedly written on July 25 (1994) and smuggled out of Vietnam by Pham Van Thanh, gave a rare glimpse of what it says are conditions inside the country's camps for political prisoners. Security police beat up political prisoners with unbelievable violence. The prisoners are beaten like animals. It is not unusual, though, to see a Communist suffering in the Party's jail. Ngo Duc Mau, a veteran Communist who had 10 year experience of French jails, gave the following description of his sufferings in a Communist prison: When we were in our dark, damp cells, we would comfort each other ... for there is a vast difference between the imperialist jail and our own. In an imperialist jail, I suffered only physical pains with my mind being comforted and at peace... But how was I treated in this place? I was tramped underfoot both physically and mentally. Those around me considered me to be an enemy, a traitor and a spy, and no one understood my situation (Hoang Van Chi, 1964: 214). Buu Lich said that maltreatment--beating and torture--has never been an element of the politics declared by the regime. Reeducation, that is, "to educate the military and civil servants of the puppet administration, so that they will be aware of the new politics, that they will repent, and that they will return to live in the bosom of the people." On the contrary, cadres never ceased screaming, insulting, abusing, humiliating, and, if necessary, beating and torturing. Mental torture lived on several preferred subjects: the puppet government and people who served it were considered creatures harmful to the country and traitors to the fatherland; they are oppressors against their people. What was even more strange in the language of cadres was that they never ceased accusing the reeducated of lack of civilization and breach of manners. Thus, according to cadres, the puppet administration servants had maltreated and abandoned their wives and children. They were rude towards women. They ate and drank without observance of rules of hygiene.

It is not necessary to say that such an idea resulted from the propaganda and brainwashing. It aimed at persuading the peasant military of the North that the history of Vietnam began in 1945 or 1975, and South Vietnam broke away from all progress beginning from that date. Born in the 50's and 60's, they had known nothing but the Communist universe of North Vietnam. They thought the way propaganda had taught them. Thus, there was no surprise when a young and naive military of the North thought that South Vietnam was still in the prehistoric stage and that his duty was to educate the people of the South about the most basic rules of hygiene, clothing fineness, and good behavior.

Concerning the beating and torture that lead to death, Buu Lich said he would only cite a case of which he was an witness. That day, in the Camp of Hoc Mon, a reeducated detainee, became delirious out of a high fever, and in a loud voice, provoked the Communist military. He insulted Ho Chi Minh, Vo Nguyen Giap, Truong Chinh, Pham Van Dong for having invaded the South and engulfed the Vietnamese people into slavery, starvation, and misfortune. He was immediately led to a container. He was beaten up by the crosshead of the gun all night. In the morning, he expired (Buu Lich, 1984: 10-11 ).

Separate Confinement

Vo Dai Ton described how he was under separate confinement at Thanh Liet camp:

Each inmate was detained in a cell. His hands were not shackled, but his feet were kept in fetters. His mouth might be stuffed with a piece of rubber fastened by a string that is pulled toward the back of his head and kept by a lock. In this way, the inmate could not cry out. The security police in Hanoi and in prison have techniques of torture without causing death. Their beating cause internal injury that is serious enough to gradually wear out the inmate's bodily strength so that within several days of recovery the inmate would be resistant enough for the next beating. They did not apply electric shock; they tied up the inmate, cornered him to the wall, forced his head down to the ground, kicked and trampled on him. Fettering inmates' feet, cutting daily food ration, and starving of inmates are common practices.

The bitterest and cruelest torture was loneliness. Vo Dai Ton said that for more than 10 years he had been under solitary detention, he had never allowed to any activity, even a simplest one. Day and night, he was scooped up alone in the cell. Time of emptiness appeared endless, exerting on one's nerves, and making one lose one's mind and become insane. As always, the food ration remained the same--rice and salt. Tediousness and despair were always in pair, really! In addition, the inmates were also toyed with psychological and sentimental tricks. They were never allowed to write to their families. No news from home! Every now and then, they show you pictures of your wife and children. Then, they put them away again, just to corrupt your mind! (Vo Dai Ton, 1993: 191).

Pham Sy recalled: I became blind during the days I was under separate confinement. I was cooped up in a tight-shut cell, 1.8m long and 0.6m wide. It was pitch-dark inside. My eyes got so accustomed to the darkness that I lost my eyesight when I came out again into sunlight. It was a kind of special cell. The floor was paved with cement which was glazed with salt. When it is hot, the floor moistens, sweating your body with ache and drying your throat. A prisoner under separate confinement, with his hands and feet tied crosswise to the back, could only lie on his stomach. He wasn't allowed to have visitors. Each day he was given only a small bowl of rice and a lot of water mixed with salt. The more one drinks it the more the stomach becomes protruded. At Phu Dong Mo and Thien Lanh Camp (Quang Nam Province, Central Vietnam), prisoners under separate confinement were fettered in groups of five. In such extreme conditions, I don't know how many of them could survive (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992). Nhat Tran, who was arrested and charged with masterminding activities against the Communist rule, noted that the Vietnamese people in the South writhed with pain when seeing their homeland falling into the hands of the North Vietnamese Communists. The so-called 'national reunification,' was, in their views, an invasion.

Upon seizing power in the South, the Communists said that they would practice a "policy of leniency" towards officials and officers of the old regime. In reality, they treated them as "debtors of blood to the people." They summoned them to "reeducation" camps set up in regions far from the cities. In Saigon, Phan Dang Luu prison became a concentration camp. Thousands of political prisoners, arbitrarily labeled as "reactionaries," were arrested and confined without trials.

Being accused of "activating" subversive dissidence against the regime, Nhat Tran, as many other prisoners, was tortured and cooped up in a dark cell with his hands and feet tied behind his back for many months. Interrogations were conducted day and night. Many prisoners died during these interrogations because of savage torture. After that, the prisoners are often transferred to a concentration camp for "reeducation" and forced labor, whether he is guilty or not. There is seldom a trial. Nevertheless, he is considered a convict. At camp, they are tacitly "reeducation" camp detainees. The people in the North are fearful of such term! There will be no fixed term of detention for a person who is under "reeducation." A man's life at camp is worthless. During the time Nhat Tran was detained at Quyet Tien camp, which is known as Cong Troi (Gate to Heaven), in Hoang Lien Son, a cadre once told him: "Your life is only worth a sheet of paper of a student's notebook." He only told the truth. The Communists don't kill prisoners. They only starve them and enslave them into hopelessness, instilling in them the idea that they will never be released. Many healthy prisoners became insane and died of hopelessness (Nguyen Tri, 14 (December 1992).

Mental Torture

Pham Van Thanh reported that, contrary to the propagandistic meaning of "reeducation," prisoners are forbidden to enrich their minds educationally. Learning activities such as studying foreign languages, human civilization, and world civilization are forbidden. Books on religion and language dictionaries are confiscated. Mental torture is used as an instrument to wither the inmates' bodily and moral strength (Pham Van Thanh, 1994).

Hoang Duy Hung, a young Vietnamese American, was quietly released on July 6, 1993. He had been secretly arrested in April 1992 on charges of "harming security and public order." Upon returning to the United States, Hoang visited the daily Nguoi Viet (The Vietnamese People) in Westminster California on July 8, 1993. He disclosed more details of his detention. Hoang said he belongs to the Youth Movement for Vietnam's Democracy, which is active in the United States as well as in Vietnam. Hoang was arrested upon his third return to Vietnam. He lost more than 40 pounds in prison. He had been held in a cell at Chi Hoa prison, among some of the famous political prisoners such as Doan Viet Hoat, the Venerable Thich Khong Tanh, Nguyen Thanh Van, and Tran Manh Quynh. He was brutally treated, being terrorized constantly and intensively. He attempted suicide. Twice, he went on a hunger strike for a total of twenty-eight days to protest the mistreatment.

Humiliation

Buu Lich recounted that, to humiliate the soldiers of the puppet government, the instructors called them before the meetings at which certain letters considered to be unsuited to the norms established by the camp were read out loud. The writers of the letters recalled certain details of their intimate life before reeducation. All were read in public, regardless of the annoyance of those who were forced to listen to them. The cadres, however, felt at ease. Was that, on their part, an intention to humiliate these people or a mode of living that would permit them to think about intimacy?

In a totalitarian regime where the public domain was ever becoming increasingly overwhelming it encroaches on the private domain. Reeducation itself is not only confined to politics and the behavior of the individual. That is why Communist cadres always "cared for" the moral attitude of the military of the puppet government. There appeared a dialogue of the deaf between the reeducated and cadres who took pride in controlling the minds of the reeducated. The educated, on the other hand, refrained from shaking with laughter. They were aware that the new regime would drag South Vietnam into decades of backwardness. Using ploughs and guns at the same time, the troops of North Vietnam were, first, revolutionary soldiers whose ideological role was more important than their function as soldiers. They never suspected that the prisoners subjected to their control were intellectuals of the South were holders of university diplomas, national and overseas.

On August 14, 1994, former National Assemblyman Nguyen Ly Tuong of the Republic of Vietnam, in an interview with the newspaper "Thoi Luan" (Vietnam Post), talked about two categories of inmates: detainees for reeducation and political dissidents. The former category was subject to strict measures as a kind of revenge. If detainees were detained in a great number, the Communists could not "display their talents." Political dissidents were arrested and detained in small groups and thus were exposed to savage treatment. Many of them were cooped up in kennels. They had to sit with their backs curved and crawl in and out grabbing food just like wild animals. Participation in any kind of protest was strictly observed. Nguyen Ly Tuong recalled an incident at Chi Hoa prison of which he was a witness. Poet Truong Thai Son was elected Chairman of the Struggle Committee and demanded respect for human rights, and discrimination between political prisoners and criminals. It was because of their participation in the struggle that Dr. Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Manh Quynh, and other political prisoners were transferred to another prison in the North. Conversations between prisoners were also strictly limited. They were observed very closely.

By executing such a mental oppression, in the view of Le Thanh, the Vietnamese Communist Party has seriously violated the human and civil rights as defined in Part IV of the 1948/50 Resolution signed by the United Nations General Assembly on December 12, 1948. In fact, however threatening, the sufferings caused by hunger and misery are much less acute than the mental suppression and spiritual destruction of the human person, the enslavement of the human being. The percentage of camp detainees who succumbed to death due to undernourishment was very much lower than that of those who died from mental and spiritual maltreatment. Punishments of other kinds were destined to exploit the prisoners’ sufferings. They put them under separate confinement. They canceled their correspondence with their family members and relatives. Worse still, local authorities forced camp detainees' wives and children to resettle in the so-called economic zone. They also screened out children of camp detainees from college and university entrance examinations. These and other forms of punishment are more cruel than death before a firing squad! (Trung Tan, 9 (May 1992)).

Deaths

During his official visit to France in April 1977, Prime Minister Pham Van Dong maintained that Lawyer Tran Van Tuyen was still alive, knowing that the lawyer, in fact, died in Lao Kay Work Camp, North Vietnam, in April 1976. Even the lawyer's family was kept totally uninformed. Former senator Hoang Xuan Hao reported in his memoirs that starvation is perdurable in Communist prisons and reeducation camps. Throughout the year 1976-1979, at reeducation camps in North Vietnam such as Lam Son and Thanh Cam in the Thanh Hoa province, the number of those prisoners who died of starvation was innumerable. They were both criminals and political prisoners. Among them were ethnic highlanders who were rounded up into prisons during the Chinese invasion into the six provinces along the Sino-Vietnamese frontier. The prisons and camps' boards of supervision could not make enough coffins for the victims. Since there were not enough coffins to keep up with the demand, the supervisors made an "all-purpose" coffin. This kind of coffin was made with bolts fastened at the bottom. One only needed to unfasten the bolts, and the corpses would then automatically released into the ditch. That was very convenient. One coffin was enough for innumerable deaths!

Hoang Hai Thuy recalled the deaths of his two friends, Nguyen Hoat and Duong Hung Cuong who were both well-known writers: Nguyen Hoat died of high blood pressure due to the lack of medical treatment. He was detained at Collective Room II, Phan Dang Luu prison, which was close to Hoang's room, 10 ED. Khuat Duy Trac, who was detained in Room 9, one night, heard a certain prisoner cried out to the cadres in charge of Room ED that there was a man who was seriously ill. It was an emergency case, and Nguyen was already unconscious. His roommate had to carry him on the back to the Chi Hoa prison's dispensary. Nguyen left the ED quarters at 11:00 p.m. The next morning, at about 9:00, Hoang and his friends heard that Nguyen died. Duong Hung Cuong died at the solitary confinement quarters of C1. Those prisoners transferred from Chi Hoa prison to Phan Dang Luu prison later recounted that Duong possibly died from a pneumonia; he was alone in his cell. At 6 o'clock in the morning, when the wardens came to make a roll call, they found him already cold dead (Hoang Hai Thuy, 1995: 34).

Executions

Anyone caught trying to escape from a reeducation camp would be shot on sight, without any semblance of a trial. Accomplices are dragged in front of the other prisoners and bludgeoned on the soles of their feet to set an example. They are then left in the prison yard, without medical treatment, without food or water, to be preyed upon by swarms of flies and ants until they die. Lieutenant colonel Pham Ba Ham at Long Thanh Camp died this way. Another barbaric method employed is chaining prisoners to a jeep, dragging them around town until they die like in the Italian westerns. This was the fate of prisoners who took part in the uprising on the second day of the 1978 Tet in the center of Ben Tre (Washington Area League for Human Rights, 1978: 18).

Nguyen Thanh Tham, who had been detained for thirteen years in reeducation camps, reported that he knows cases of savage execution of officers of the Republic of Vietnam. Lieutenant Colonel Vo Vang was executed while he was sent to clear forest at Bong Mieu, Ky Son, Quang Nam Province in 1976. He was separated from his work team and ordered by a warden to go in a different direction. After fifteen minutes, three gun shots were heard. Back at camp in the evening, the warden said that Vo Vang tried to escape and was shot dead. Lieutenant Ha Thuc Long was shot dead in a similar situation at Ky Son in 1977. After an abortive scheme to escape from camp, Air Force Captain Nguyen Dien was secretly executed at An Diem, Quang Nam Province in 1979.

Revenge on the Prisoner

Nguyen Quoc Quan, Chairman of the International Support Committee for the High Tide Movement for Humanism, informed in August 1994, that the Hanoi administration avenged on Nguyen Dan Que. Hanoi failed to compromise Nguyen Dan Que before it prepared a meeting between Nguyen Dan Que and U.S. Senator Charles Robb. On August 29, 1993, Nguyen Dan Que, from labor camp K3 in Xuan Loc, sent a short handwritten letter to Senator Charles Robb, the International Amnesty, and Nguyen Quoc Quan alarming that he was terrorized.

The letter said:

The Hanoi government's police officers are trying to take revenge on me and carrying out a lot of measures of repression against the political prisoners after the failure of the meeting between me and Senator Charles Robb. Having nonviolently struggled against [the regime], we denounce this before international opinions and call on them for their effective supports to prevent Hanoi's unpredicted black underhands. Before his visit to Vietnam in August 1993, Senator Charles Robb sent a letter to Socialist Republic of Vietnam Ambassador to the U.N. Le Van Bang. He informed him that he wanted to meet Nguyen Dan Que and give him medicine and a letter from his brother, Nguyen Quoc Quan. The ambassador said that he could satisfy the request. However, the Communist authority refused to allow the Senator to visit the camp.

Terms of Detention

Nhat Tran, who was detained without trial, said that, in general, a term of detention is three years. Depending on the category into which he is classified, a camp detainee can be either released after three years of detention or more. Communist cadres often classify camp detainees according to categories: those officers and officials who are relatives of Communist high-ranking cadres and members of the Vietnamese Communist Party, those officers and officials who cooperated with or worked for the Communists during the war, those who are seriously ill and can't escape death, and those who work as spies in camps for the Communists...

During the first three years, camp detainees were under the control of the Communist troops. During the next three years, they are under the control of cadres from the Ministry for the Interior--the Secret Police. Camp detainees were then screened out and categorized according to their "crimes against the people." Those officers and officials who were considered the most dangerous elements were sent to camps in the North, and those who were less dangerous were retained in camps in the South. A term of detention varies along lines of favors, privileges, or "crimes." A Major can be released before or after three years of detention while a noncommissioned officer or lower level official can be detained for 5, 6, or 10 years (Nguyen Tri, 14 (December 1993)).

Vo Dai Ton, who ventured to go back to Vietnam to join the Resistance, related that the prison with the secret code B14 (Thanh Liet, Thanh Tri District, Ha Dong Province) is about 12 kilometers south of the center of Hanoi. It is under the supervision of the Ministry for the Interior. People call it Thanh Liet Camp. In principle, it is a temporary detention camp. All kinds of prisoners, both political prisoners and criminals, were under temporary detention there for interrogation. In practice, under the Communist legal system, temporary detention also means that you will be detained until death without trial and without a specific term of detention. The Ministry for the Interior only needs to sign a new term of detention for every three years, and you will be detained until death for the reason that you have not yet been well reeducated. Any political prisoner transferred to this prison would have an unlimited term of detention, which is elastic as rubber (Vo Dai Ton, 1993: 169).

Correspondence

No prisoner, no matter in what prison he is detained, has the right to contact his family, even by letter, only on Tet (New Year) and the Labor Day (May 1). On these days, he is allowed to write, provided that his letter should strictly conform with the Prison Superintendent's instructions and follow the three following topics: 1) I am well (whatever the prisoner's actual physical condition); 2) The Government is merciful to me (for all my wrong doings); and 3) At home, you must obey the orders of the Government, which is so generous to us (Washington Area League for Human Rights, 1978: 17-18 ).

Mails leaving camp that have not yet been censored by the camp authorities are restricted. All disciplinary deviations are met with solitary confinement coupled with being fettered in a mere 2.5 square meters cell. The mail contents should be coupled with the expression of political faith in the regime. There are by-laws for mail writing, and the camp prisoners have to comply with them strictly. So, the inmates often try to convey their hidden ideas through hints in their letters to their families. The following is the content of a letter of an inmate who developed beriberi.

My Dear ...,

I'm very well. You and the children don't have to worry about me. In the daytime, I labor happily. At night, I no longer lead a fast life or drink as I did years ago. Moreover, the Revolution really cares for me, materially and spiritually. I'm getting fat now.

Today, the Revolution gives me a favor, allowing me to write to you to tell you that I could receive a three-kilogram package of food and medicine for additional use. To tell you the truth, I practically don't need anything. But, if possible, send me the following items:

-- 3 packs of tobacco

-- 2 kilograms of raw sugar

-- 1 kilogram of brown sugar mixed in lime juice.

          -- Of most importance, Vitamin B1, the strongest one. Love,

Nguyen Van A.

P.S. Absolutely, no salted food. Specifically, I don't like meat.

P.S. Again, only 3kgs.. Otherwise, we will violate the camp by-laws. The best thing to do is to read carefully the official announcement in the newspaper.

The by-laws specify, among other things, that the mail contents must not be written in a foreign language, that they must not disclose the name or location of the camp, and that they must not contain any complaints or codes in any forms. Upon completion, the camp wardens censored the mail.. Under such strict living circumstances, the wardens exploited the inmates to the fullest of their obedience using even a bowl of rice or rice soup, or a more artful trick, a promise that they would allow them to receive a more than three-kilogram package, to incite the inmates to kill one another (Ha Thuc Sinh, 1993: 253-261).

Currency Exchange

The currency exchange system in camp is primitive and exploitative. Prisoners are not allowed to possess commonly used currency. Money given by prisoners' families are to be converted to "prison currency." They are instantly devalued by 50%. At the same time, of the prices of goods sold in camp are at least twice more expensive than the same goods sold outside of camp. Prisoners at Camp A20 can only survive on supplies from their families.

Visits

On May 13, 1994, Tran Thi Thuc, in her letter to the Party leadership and government, presented the constraints of the arrest and the hardship on detention of her husband and the restrictions on her visit to him. The letter wrote, in part:

Recently, my son and I underwent so much hardship to travel as far as Nam Ha (Ba Sao Camp) to visit and supply my husband with some provisions. We came to the camp on May 1, 1994, exhausted after a long journey of thousands of kilometers from far away. Nevertheless, we were informed by the authorities at Ba Sao that my husband had been transferred to Thanh Cam Camp in Cam Thuy, Thanh Hoa Province, approximately 200 kilometers from Ba Sao Camp. I had to resign myself to leave, guessing my way to Thanh Cam. On May 2, we arrived at Thanh Cam, but the camp authorities resolutely refused to let my son and me see my husband. They only agreed to hand our gift weighing 5kgs to my husband. Finally, I resigned myself to leave the gift at the camp. I had to ask the camp authority to hand it over to my husband. After nearly a week-long journey of exhaustion and waiting, I was not allowed to see my husband even just for one minute.

In this letter of protest, I would like to extend to you my strongest protests, as far as my husband is concerned, because: 1. The Ministry for the Interior continually transfers him from one camp to another (Ham Tan, Xuan Phuoc, Ba Sao, Thanh Cam), farther and farther in the open forest with unhealthy climate, and detains him among dangerous criminals. 2. Doan Viet Hoat has never been convicted with a forced labor sentence. Therefore, he has the right to refuse to perform heavy work (such as rock breaking). Then, why has the camp administration coerced him to discipline and put him in solitary confinement? 3. My husband has a history of severe kidney stones. My family needs to follow up with his health condition regularly. Nevertheless, he has been continually transferred from one place to another. We often lose information about him, and when we can come to his place of detention, we are not allowed to see him. Then, how can we conclude whether or not his health is good.

Visits by international personalities are also restricted. Tran Manh Quynh recounted: That morning (Friday October 12, 1993), they brought me to see Mr. James Curtis Struble, Consul General and Counselor for Consular Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Thailand, at the meeting hall in Chi Hoa prison. There was a mystery about the visit. They had not let me know anything about it. They gave me a haircut and shave without my asking for it. They told me to change my clothes and take off my prison garments to meet my family. By that time, my mother was visiting Vietnam. I was thus perplexed. She might want to see me before she went back to the United States on Saturday, November 13, 1993. They probably gave her a favor so that she would say something advantageous to them. They usually used the same old trick!

During the meeting with Mr. James Curtis Struble, I presented to him all the violations of human rights by the tyrannical administration, several main points concerning my trial, which were not as detailed as this report. Security policemen of the tyrannical administration stood all around, but how could they prevent me from telling the truth? In this report, again, I would like to express my thanks to the Government of the United States and the World for their concerns over thousands of political prisoners who have been detained by the tyrannical administration. Could the impertinent statements by Under Secretary Le Mai that were completely untrue and that came out of infantile tricks and vile deceit in the political and foreign affairs beguile the world, again?

Mr. James Curtis Struble asked me if I wanted to express the facts I had disclosed to him to the Vietnamese communities, the U.S. Congress, the world, and my family. I answered: "Yes, I want to." He gave to me the piece of paper on which he had jotted down all the things I had done and all the incidents I had disclosed to him for my signature, but the group of security police present at the meeting did not agree to let me sign it (Tran Manh Quynh, 1994: 8).

On August 10, 1994, the Vietnamese Communist authorities debarred the American Human Rights activist David Phillips of the U.S. Congressional Human Rights Foundation from entering Vietnam to visit Dr. Nguyen Dan Que. He had the intention to meet with the Vietnamese Communist leadership to discuss the human rights issues in Vietnam. Phillips flew to Vietnam and arrived at the Tan Son Nhat Airport on August 9, 1994. immigration officials denied his entry. He had with him a prize awarded to Dr. Nguyen Dan Que by the Raoul Wallenberg human rights agency. It was known that the Vietnamese Communist authorities had not allowed Dr. Nguyen to come to the United States to receive the award.

Protest at Camp

The Committee on Human Rights in Paris reported from reliable sources inside Vietnam saying that supervisors at Camp A20 duped the U.N. Human Rights Action Team, led by Louis Joinet, when they visited the camp on October 28, 1994. At 13:30 p.m on October 28, 1994, the supervisors at the A20 camp ordered all the prisoners, including ailing and sick prisoners, to leave the camp immediately. Before that time, a group of prisoners had been transferred to another camp. Still, another group of prisoners, among whom were Monks Thich Tue Sy Pham Van Thuong, Thich Phuoc Vien Le Hien, Thich Tam Can Nguyen Huu Tin, Pham Van Thanh, Le Hoan Son, Pham Anh Dung, and Nguyen Ngoc Dang, were isolated. At 16:00 p.m., the U.N. Human Rights Action Team visited the A20 Camp in Phu Yen Province, commonly known as "the Death Valley." There, 2,000 tombs still stood around the camp. They were the evidences of the deaths of prisoners of conscience and political prisoners. These prisoners died from maltreatment between 1976 and 1987. The team requested to visit the prisoners and 8 rows of houses in the camp. The camp's Board of Supervisors explained that "all the prisoners had been moved to assist in the flood aid actions in the Mekong Delta." The team only met 4 "model" healthy, neatly dressed prisoners. As a matter of fact, they "praised the regime and the policy of leniency of the Party and State towards prisoners." The visit lasted two hours, during which electricity in almost everywhere throughout the camp was cut, and prisoners were ordered not to make any noise to create an atmosphere of silence and emptiness. At 22:00 p.m., the prisoners were allowed to go back to their detention rooms. They did not even know about the presence of a U.N. team at camp and thus did not have a chance to meet them and present to them the severe measures against them in Communist prisons. The prisoners expressed their indignation at 5:00 a.m. on October 29, 1994. This expression of indignation quickly spread to other houses of detention. At last, all 250 political prisoners heatedly protested against the camp's board of supervisors for duping the U.N. Human Rights Team. Seven political prisoners were called in for interrogation, and 87 others were forced to calm down the situation. At 20:00 p.m. on the same day, political prisoner Pham Van Thanh announced a hunger strike. On the morning of October 29, 1994, political prisoners Hoang Xuan Chinh and Tran Nam Phuong announced their support for Pham Van Thanh and went on a hunger strike to protest against the camp's board of supervisors for violating international conventions and obstructing political prisoners from meeting the U.N. Human Rights Team. The hunger strike spread all around Camp A20.

Confronting the open protest of the prisoners in the whole camp, the camp's board of supervisors mobilized prison wardens, in cooperation with military troops, to crush down the political prisoners' protest. There were gunshots, and many political prisoners were wounded. On the evening of October 30, 1994, Pham Van Thanh was fettered and cooped up in a separate detention cell. The hunger strike lasted seven days and ended in the repression of the security police force.

Tran Manh Quynh said:

I challenged the tyrannical administration here in Vietnam demanding it to free thousands of political prisoners (and not just 585 political prisoners as claimed by the press abroad). It must respect and carry out the principles stipulated by the International Bill of Human rights. Their serious violations on human rights would make our fellow compatriots suffer more and isolate Vietnam from the world's progression toward peace and stability. I also demanded the tyrannical Communist administration to realize Democracy, accept political pluralism, develop all spheres of democracy to build the country and bring happiness and welfare sooner to the people to join others in this modern world. I hope patriotic associations and organizations that struggle for Freedom and Democracy in Vietnam will push forward this movement of struggle calling the world to support our just cause (Tran Manh Quynh, 1994: 6). Le Thanh, a high-ranking officer in the pre-1975 Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces, who was detained in camp for 13 and a half years, said: Now, we aren't in a time of savage when maltreatment is so seriously taken into account as it was in the years 1917-18 under the Soviet communism. Neither do we necessarily recall the genocide that occurred under the Pol Pot regime, which adopted a kind of primitive communism. We are now in the last decade of the 20th century when international commitments are to be correctly carried out. The Communists must respect the rights of prisoners to be treated with decency. The Communist administration must, under any circumstances, abide by international laws and treaties, and, particularly, regulations as stipulated in the U.N. International Bill of Human Rights which it pledged to obey when it was admitted to the U.N. membership (Trung Tan, 9 (May 1992)). Is He Really Free?

The "Blood University" by Ha Thuc Sinh ended with a living scene near a stream running across the Ham Tan camp. The author and his fellow inmates just got their temporary release permits and had a bath in the stream before leaving the camp. Seeing the inmates happily wading in the stream, a security guard at the camp gate shouted:

-- Eh! you prisoner rascals, which battalion and which ward do you belong to? Why are you still having a bath at this time?

-- Dear cadre, we're already released. We're already free.

Hearing this, a second guard intercepted:

-- Watch your tongue! How dare you address to a cadre in such a manner? You think that you are already free?

[Ha Thuc Sinh concluded his report at this point.] The last question had no answer. But, it was literally and textually registered in his book for the readership to contemplate. Every now and then, a Communist made a slip of his tongue for a question, but quite a few people are unaware of it. If they are aware, the world would save much time, paper and ink, and blood (Ha Thuc Sinh, 1993: 821).

Under the Administrative Detention

Nguyen Thi Diep described how the Most Venerable Thich Quang Do lived under administrative detention:

Vu Thu isn't the Most Venerable [Quang Do] 's home village. I myself had, in secret, paid him several visits. Acting as if I were his niece, I was successful in passing the control of the local police and having contacts with him through the help of a cadre, who is one of my relatives. At first, the Most Venerable seemed to be embarrassed since I'm really not his niece. But, he soon realized that I was his visitor. He told me to wait for him in his small thatch house. He went to a pond nearby to wash his face, but, in fact, he observed the place to see if there were any cadres, who spied on him everyday. The Most Venerable Quang Do was given 13 kilograms of rice a month. He had to trade some portions of them for salt or household commodities. But since 1986, under the contract system, local authorities have ceased giving him his monthly rice ration. He was allocated a piece of land to cultivate and support himself (Thien Nhan, 7 (March 1992)). Le Thanh said: As is known, the Communists always isolate personalities of prestige from the old regime from the people lest their influence could again take root in the population and thus engender possible political opposition, a danger that is likely to happen any time in Communist Vietnam... It's not owing to the policy of "renovation" that took place after the Sixth Vietnam Communist Party Congress (1986) that officers and officials of the old regime were treated reasonably "leniently." One should remember that officers and officials of the Republic of Vietnam are, to the Communists, "lackeys" and "enemies of the people." They are treated reasonably "leniently" due to international intervention and the pressure by international human rights agencies. Besides, fearful of being isolated from international politics and cut off in financial aid by Western democratic countries, which they need to sustain the debilitated economy, the Communists loosen their grip on officers and officials of the old regime (Trung Tan, 9 (May 1992). Dinh Phu said: Anyone released from camp is subject to administrative detention. The term of detention varies with local policies and local authorities. In the Interzone V--Quang Nam, Quang Nghia, Binh Dinh, and Phu Yen provinces (Central Vietnam), where I belonged, the regulations were stricter. I was placed under administrative detention for three years. I had to keep a diary noting everything I did and thought during the day. I reported myself at the village security police office then at the province security police department at the end of every month. Many times I was summoned to report myself to these offices without prior notice. It was often an interrogation. They threatened me into reporting subversive activities of ex-camp detainees or anti-Communist elements and my connections with them and any attempts to escape from the country made by these people that I might know. They often invented stories about anti-Communist events to trap me, but I wasn't easily taken by their lies. And they knew it. They strictly controlled me with a web of local undercover agents, and I was without a penny. Having threatened me in vain, they allured me into cooperating with them. Security police captain Nguyen Trong A of Mo Duc district (Quang Ngai Province, Central Vietnam) once promised me privileges if I offered myself to engage in his counterrevolutionary plans--spying on anti-Communist organizations or attempts to escape from the country by ex-camp detainees. I refused saying that I was old and in poor health and thus wasn't fit for the job (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)). Mai A, a WAAC Major, said: I myself felt totally lost and desperate since I did not know how to start my life. Having been a former WAAC lieutenant in the Air Force, Ms. Y., who went to school for four years in the United States, committed suicide by drinking soda mixed with "optalidon" pills. She died in her sleep when she was only 25 years old. The reason for her death is the fact that, after being released from camp after two years of detention, she came to ask the Ho Chi Minh City Department of Health for a job. The Communists wanted her to work at Xuyen Moc forest, a dangerous place. Feeling so depressed, she killed herself. As for me, I graduated from the French School of Special Social Services--Centre Caritas, 38 Tu Xuong Street, Saigon. I also asked the Ho Chi Minh City Department of Health for a job. The reply was that the Department did not know of any position to which I could be assigned. They then sent me to work at an agricultural camp saying that practically working at the camp would help convert myself into a member of the working class, notably, I had been freshly "reeducated" at camp. With no other choices, I had to work at the agricultural camp so that my four children would not be forced to go and live in a new economic zone as many camp detainees' families would be (Trung Tan, 12 (August-September 1992)). Nhat Tran said: Under imprisonment in a Communist regime, any camp detainee would certainly wish to be released and go back and live with his family because this is to him an impossibility. Even when his name is called out among those prisoners who were about to be released, he would still be surprised and wouldn't believe his ears. More than a surprise to him is the fact that when a list of names of 34 prisoners is read out, only 32 of them walk out. The other two absentees died a year ago!

A week before his release, the camp detainee's family in the South is summoned to the city or province security police office to be informed of the news. In reality, his family members are warned of their liability for his activities once he is back home and advised to keep a lookout on him. Upon his return, he has to report himself to the local security police. There, they verify the release order and stamp on the camp certificate. This, the veteran camp detainee will use as an identity verification for movement outside his home. Once a month, he has to come to the local precinct security police office and present to the authorities in charge the notebook with reports on his daily activities (Nguyen Tri, 14 (December 1992)).

Political and Social Discrimination

According to Le Thanh, political discrimination is very strong. In many cases, a private, a sergeant, a second lieutenant, a teacher, a priest, a writer, or even a businessman could be detained in camp for 10 or more years if he was a prominent personality whose prestige may influence the population in the local area, and if he is likely dangerous to the Communist regime. Once released from camp, such individual is not allowed to return to his home town. He is often placed under the control of the local police or confined in some other areas.

There was no surprise when the Communists engaged in using the administrative personnel body of the Republic of Vietnam. To maintain the status quo, they needed them to normalize public administration. However, after they had stabilized their control over the administrative systems, they gradually replaced officials of the old political regime with cadres from the North. Many officials of the old regime were then dismissed or displaced.

As regards specialists and experts, the Communists employ only those they consider the most necessary, those whom they can't find anyone to replace. The Communists are not much concerned about employing personnel with diplomas. They are particularly concerned with state workers and officials with absolute loyalty to the Communist party and communism. They don't need cadres with a creative mind. They need those who carry out, with complete obedience, commandments and orders from the party central committees. Who, among veteran camp detainees, would be employed by the State?

Ho Nguyen said:

Whoever believes that the Vietnamese Communist administration has carried out the policy of leniency and national concord right after the takeover of South Vietnam is dead wrong. Some people said that the Communist government employed all the civil servants of the old regime, except those who were summoned to reeducation camps. I think that's only a lie. Civil servants, experts, and specialists in the public administration and industry of the Republic of Vietnam were employed after the takeover of South Vietnam. There were even engineers and specialists who had been summoned to camps being called back to work in factories and firms where the Communists couldn't find anyone to replace them. The then Vice-Director of the Ha Tien Cement Factory and the then Vice-Director of the Cogido Paper Mill fell into this category. Nevertheless, they were all sent back to camp after a short time. We should remember that the new administration also recruited a new contingent of personnel, the larger part of it was cadres' relatives and those who worked for the Communists during the war. In most cases, the communists are concerned with employees with good personal political backgrounds--those who are Communist-affiliated members or agents (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)). In their negotiations with US delegates to allow veteran political prisoners to leave the country on the HO programs, Mai A believed, the Vietnamese Communists followed a twofold purpose. One, they want to prove that, like the Americans, they themselves are humane. Two, by allowing veteran political prisoners to leave the country, they will probably clean out an overlaying danger: political opposition. So long as a great number of officials and officers of the old regime remain in Vietnam, they will likely either boost a revolt against the political regime or work in collaboration with overseas elements towards overthrowing the Communist regime (Trung Tan, 12 (August-September 1992)) .

Pham Sy explicated:

After the Communist takeover of south Vietnam, almost all of the most able officials and officers of the Republic of Vietnam were summoned to concentration camps. The Armed Forces of the Republic of Vietnam was disbanded. Officials of the lower ranks in the administration of the old regime still stayed with the new regime, although they weren't willing to serve under it. Many civil servants, including teachers, were cautious since they didn't know how the new regime would look on them. To maintain the status quo, the communists, on their part, kept them unwillingly at work. A number of opportunists showed their eagerness to cooperate with the new regime. At the local offices in the districts, sub-districts in the cities, or villages in the provinces, there also appeared a new wave of opportunists whom people called "revolutionaries of the [April] 30" (April 30, 1975 was the day the Vietnamese communists troops took over Saigon). These hooligans helped the Communist troops take over the administration at the infrastructure levels. In the cities, most of these opportunists were cornerboys and hooligans who wore red armbands and who took such jobs as controlling the traffic at crossroads or directing access to office buildings (Van Chuong, 10 (June 1992)). Requests

Political prisoner Pham Van Thanh specifically requests the United Nations Commission on Human Rights: 1) to investigate into the deaths of religious leaders such as the Venerable Thich Thien Minh, Buddhist monk, who died at Camp A20; the Venerable Thich Tri Thu, Buddhist monk, who died at Thong Nhat Hospital; the Reverend Nguyen Van Vang, Catholic priest, who died while under separate confinement in 1986; the Reverend Nguyen Luan, Catholic priest, who died while under separate confinement in 1986; and the Reverend Minh, Catholic priest of the St. Vincent Order, who died under separate confinement in 1986; 2) to conduct investigations regarding medical conditions at Camp A20 where only aspirin is prescribed regardless of illness! Admission to the hospital almost assures death to follow (as in the cases of Truong and Truc, who both died when reaching Tuy Hoa Hospital); 3) to conduct investigations regarding inhuman conditions at Camp A20 such as imprisoning political prisoners with criminals such as murderers, rapists, and robbers to allow the latter to keep surveillance on the former. Political prisoners could be abused or degraded at will by those criminals. This type of ill-treatment will torture their minds to an insufferable limit of tension; 4) conduct investigations into all forms of violations of religious freedom. Prisoners are forbidden to pray, to celebrate the Holy Mass, to burn incense, to place religious symbols and idols on top of their beds. All other religious activities such as promulgation of faith or expression of religious belief are strictly prohibited; and 5) to conduct investigations into the exploitation of prisoners' labor which is devoted to enriching a small number of wardens and guards. These incidents are too numerous to be itemized.

Remarks

1. Code 71 in the 1992 Constitution states that "No citizen is considered guilty when not tried and sentenced by a court." This shows that only the sentence handed down by the court is legal. Any addition or subtraction to the court's sentence in any form and by any individuals or organizations during the time of the sentence is served is clearly violating Code 71 of the current Constitution.

2. The serving of the sentence stands other laws abiding document; therefore, one cannot violate the spirit and content of code 71 as well as other codes in the Constitution that is the highest law. In other words, the serving of a sentence cannot go beyond the sentence handed down by the court, regarding the time served and penalty. Practically speaking, forced labor, especially manual hard labor, is only applied constitutionally and legally to the sentences if the court decides to have such penalties (hard labor, light labor) carried out.

3. In the current judicial system, there are only sentences for detention, and there is no decision on whether forced labor, light or hard, is to be applied. Therefore, any forced labor, in any form, is clearly a violation of the sentences of the courts. If forced labor continues, then it violates code 71 of the current Constitution, the international public laws and norms and especially the Universal Covenants on Civil and Human Rights regarding legal process and detention.

Recommendations

After reviewing the living and working conditions in the prison camps, Doan Viet Hoat, Tran Tu, and Tran Manh Quynh recommended the Vietnamese Communist authorities: 1) To establish a national commission to inspect prison camps. This commission must be totally independent of all institutions involved in the organization and operation of prison camps. This committee should be placed directly under the National Assembly, the Prime Minister and be vested with the responsibilities to inspect all prison camps, to study the situations in the prison camps, and make recommendations for changes in prison policy. 2) To review all legal documents relating to every aspect of organization and management of prison camps as well as the implementation of the courts' sentences. Any violation of the spirit and the content of the current Constitution must be corrected, and 3) While waiting for these major corrections, a number of immediate changes to the current working and living conditions in the camps need to be made to lessen the negative effects and increase the educating effect during the detention. They recommend, in particular, a) to abolish all forms of extreme hard labor and to reduce working hours; b) to organize classes to teach literacy, foreign languages, vocations, etc.; c) to allow entertaining activities such as music, exercises, sports, etc.; and d) to utilize the abilities of the prisoners themselves to organize the above activities (Pham Van Thanh, 1994).

| Trang bìa | Ðầu trang
1