Everyone in the SETI community knows that ET broadcasts in the microwave region of the radio spectrum between 1400 and 1700 megahertz. Any suggestion to the contrary is met with shouts of ridicule. The idea that we might look for ET at very low frequencies, therefore, would probably put most of these people on the floor in fits of hysteria.
In fact no one has the slightest idea where to look for a signal from ET. None of the so called experts have ever found an ET signal.
Ever. Even once.
There was a time when all of the aviation experts knew that the only way to build a flying machine was to use flapping wings. That's why none of the early aviation experts ever actually flew.
Ever. Even once.
It wasnt until the Wright brothers tried something completely different that it turned out to be possible.
Let's try something completely different. Let's look for ET at the other end of the radio spectrum.
Granted, "let's look somewhere else" is not a powerful argument. I only mean to make the point that when we dont know what we are doing and get nowhere for a really long time, that a new approach is often called for. I am suggesting that VLF SETI is a valid approach and that it is defensible on its own merits for several very good reasons:
Not only is VLF a reasonable way to communicate locally, but it would allow local communications THRU and AROUND a planetary mass. It is not just one of many possible methods, it is among the best possible methods!
VLF is not only one of the best possible methods for space probes to use for communications, but it can also be used it to study any worlds they approach.
So, lets see now, in the very range of frequencies that we think might be useful to alien space probes, for communications and environmental measurements, we have already found a lot of "noise" that we can't explain.
Meteors? Are they all meteors?
In 40 years of SETI no one has ever heard anything in the water hole. And NO ONE is trying to build a beacon, because we all agree that there is no point to it. It would need funding for thousands of years and no one involved in it would live long enough to see the results, if any. So, why do we think anyone else would see any point to it?
In the mean time, what's all that noise in the VLF portion of the spectrum??
Penicillin was discovered while doing research on bread mold.
Wouldn't it be interesting to make a video tape of UFOs in action and record some VLF sounds on the soundtrack? A few weird hoots and whistles that correlate to their movements would be a real attention getter. If this actually happens it would open up a whole new area of research. Maybe we could even TRACK them on Bi-static radar while we video tape! My wife has a camcorder in layaway, I'll let you know how it turns out.
How about a webcam watching the sky all night in my backyard for passing "meteors" and recording the pictures and VLF sounds together?
Data aquisition: The Soundblaster card
The spectrum analysis software mentioned in this section takes its input from a Soundblaster card and requires no other data aquisition card. The signal simply goes in thru the "mic" input and you are in business. The Soundblaster card, or a compatible, is required.
Frequency Range
For our purposes we will consider Very Low Frequency to mean, below approximately 20 thousand hertz, ( 20khz ), because the Soundblaster can handle any frequency in this range without external hardware.
If you choose to explore other frequency ranges, converters are available, or can be built for any range you like.
Theory
For information on theory, antennas, construction practices, definition of terms, and VLF spectra, I stongly suggest that you check out these websites:
You really should look at them before going on. I will make a reasonable effort to explain things as we go along, but a little background first, would be helpful. When you go to, "Radio Waves Below 22KHZ", scroll down to the bottom of the main page and look at the "unexplained signals" section. There is some very strange stuff out there.