°Chlorination°


Why We Chlorinate Our Water...



Throughout history there have been epidemics of disease brought about by contaminated drinking water. Cholera, Typhoid, and Dysentery...all water-borne diseases..have been the cause of death for massive anounts of people. It was not until the 19th century that scientists proved that by cleaning up our drinking water, we could end the killing by these persistant diseases.


°°°By the beginning of the 20th century,water in both of our rivers was SO polluted that MANY of our people died of typhoid fever & cholera every year. To combat these terrible diseases, our city began building its first water treatment plants in 1902. Treatment at that time consited of filtering the water through sand & allowing it to settle. When the first filter plants were put into service, typhoid deaths dropped to only 25% of what they had been. When Chlorine was added to the water back in 1913, typhoid & cholera were wiped out entirely!

There are many 3rd world countries where death rates caused by these organisms are still very high.


Below is some information I feel relevant to our treatment process.. The results of a cancer study pertaining to chlorinated, chlor-aminated water are shown...This information was found using the Awesome power of The Chemfinder. ...Use of Chemfinder was graciously donated to us by CambridgeSoft Corporation. Please click on the above links & give them a visit!

TR-392 Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Chlorinated Water (CAS Nos. 7782-50-5 and 7681-52-9) and Chloraminated Water (CAS No. 10599-90-3) (Deionized and Charcoal-Filtered) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies)

Chemical Formula (Chloramine): NH2Cl   -    3D Structure

Chlorine and chloramine are used as disinfectants in water supplies to prevent the spread of waterborne diseases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Congress, through the Safe Drinking Water Acts and Amendments, initiated studies to determine the most effective way to disinfect water supplies and, at the same time, minimize any potential long-term health effects associated with direct chemical exposure or indirect chemical exposure through the formation of byproducts. As part of this evaluation, 2-year studies of chlorinated or chloraminated deionized charcoal-filtered drinking water were conducted in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice to determine the potential toxicity and carcinogenicity associated with prolonged exposure and eliminate possible confounding effects of byproducts of chlorination.

Chlorinated Water Studies
Water containing 0, 70, 140, or 275 ppm chlorine (based on available atomic chlorine) was provided to groups of 70 F344/N rats or B6C3F1 mice of each sex for up to 2 years. Groups of 10 rats or mice of each sex were predesignated for evaluation at 14 or 15 weeks and 66 weeks.

Survival at 2 years of rats and mice receiving chlorinated water was similar to that of the controls. Mean body weights of dosed male rats, high-dose female rats, and dosed mice were slightly lower than those of their respective control groups. There was a dose-related decrease in water consumption by rats and mice. Water consumption by high-dose rats during the second year of the studies was 21% lower than controls for males and 23% lower than controls for females; water consumption by high-dose mice was 31% lower than controls for males and 26% lower than controls for females.

The incidence of mononuclear cell leukemia in mid-dose, but not high-dose, female rats was significantly higher than that in controls (control, 8/50; low-dose, 7/50; mid-dose, 19/51; high-dose, 16/50). The proportion of female rats that died of leukemia before the end of the study and the mean time for observation of animals dying with leukemia were similar among all dose groups and controls. Although the marginal increase in leukemia incidence in the mid- and high-dose female rats suggested a possible association with the administration of chlorinated water, the incidence of leukemia was not clearly dose related. There was no indication of reduced latency of leukemia, and the incidence of leukemia in concurrent controls was less than the mean for historical controls; furthermore, there was no supporting evidence of an effect in male rats. Thus, the marginal increase in leukemia incidence in female rats was considered equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity. There were no neoplasms or nonneoplastic lesions in male rats or in male or female mice that were clearly associated with the consumption of chlorinated water.

Chloraminated Water Studies
Water containing 50, 100, or 200 ppm chloramine was provided to groups of 70 F344/N rats or B6C3F1 mice of each sex for up to 2 years. The same control groups were used for the chlorinated water and chloraminated water studies. Groups of 9 or 10 rats or mice of each sex were evaluated at 14 or 15 weeks and 66 weeks.

Survival at 2 years of rats and mice receiving chloraminated water was similar to that of the controls. Mean body weights of high-dose rats and dosed mice were lower than those of their respective control groups. There was a dose-related decrease in water consumption by rats and mice. Water consumption during the second year of the studies by high-dose rats was 34% lower than controls for males and 31% lower than controls for females; water consumption by high-dose mice was 42% lower than controls for males and 40% lower than controls for females.

Mononuclear cell leukemia occurred with a marginally increased incidence in the mid- and high-dose female rats receiving chloraminated water (control, 8/50; low dose, 11/50; mid dose, 15/50; and high dose, 16/50). As in female rats receiving chlorinated water, the proportion of female rats that died of leukemia before the end of the study and the mean time for observation of animals dying with leukemia were similar among all dose groups and controls. The marginal increase in leukemia incidence in females receiving chloraminated water was considered equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity for the same reasons given for female rats receiving chlorinated water. There were no neoplasms or nonneoplastic lesions in male rats or in male or female mice that were clearly associated with the consumption of chloraminated water.

Conclusions
Under the conditions of these 2-year drinking water studies, there was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of chlorinated water in male F344/N rats receiving 70, 140, or 275 ppm. There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of chlorinated water in female F344/N rats based on an increase in the incidence of mononuclear cell leukemia. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of chlorinated water in male or female B6C3F1 mice receiving 70, 140, or 275 ppm.

Under the conditions of these 2-year drinking water studies, there was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of chloraminated water in male F344/N rats receiving 50, 100, or 200 ppm. There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of chloraminated water in female F344/N rats based on an increase in the incidence of mononuclear cell leukemia. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of chloraminated water in male or female B6C3F1 mice receiving 50, 100, or 200 ppm.

Pathology Tables, Survival and Growth Curves from NTP 2-year Studies

Report Date: March 1992

NTIS# PB92-191659


YOUR LOCAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT....Bringing the people of Your City, and It's Suburbs, the FINEST quality Drinking Water available anywhere in the World!


Go to the CapeCanaveral Top Menu

-- 1