The State of Technology at
Saint Norbert College
"What forms of IT are being used in the classroom, and what is
the current state of technology here at Saint Norbert College?"
I've chosen to combine these two questions, because the answer to the
first of the two is so dependent upon the last. And, as far as the average
student is concerned, the answer to both is "low."
In the couple of technology oriented classes that I've had the level
IT present was (as expected) rather high. Microsoft PowerPoint was introduced
to the students and hypermedia programs like HyperCard and HyperStudio
(both on the Macintosh) were used quite a bit, both for presentations
and student portfolios. Very often students were given the option of submitting
their projects electronically rather than in "hard copy". Student
and teachers both used a variety of presentation mediums, ranging from
student created videos to computer-to-television links.
For the rest of my classes, though, the use of IT has been very low,
consisting mostly of transparencies and the occasional video, and sometimes
slide shows as well. Professors really cannot be blamed for not using
IT more in many of these situations, though. As a rule, if technology
is hard to use it won't be used, and for instructors in many
buildings it is very hard to use.
In Cofrin Hall the level of technology is pretty high and relatively
easy to integrate into the classroom. But in Boyle Hall there really aren't
any accommodations to make it easy for an instructor (or student) to roll
in a PC and project its information onto a screen, or to use forms of
IT other than transparencies and videos. For the classes I've had in PAC,
you couldn't even get a VCR and monitor into to view videos in the classroom
much less other forms of IT.
Those students interested in using IT for class projects are rather quickly
discouraged if they are dependent upon the resources supplied by Saint
Norbert College. The Bemis labs are very well equipped, but student access
is very limited. It is sometimes hard to predict when a class will be
working in there (closing it to other students) and its erratic lab hours
make it an unreliable, and therefore invalid, resource for students. Cofrin
Hall's level of technology is relatively high but has its limitations.
The DOS/Windows labs are overcrowded much of the time and the student
staff lacks expertise with the software, especially on the Macintosh machines.
The quality of Cofrin Hall's Macintosh lab is poor in general, both its
hardware and support for it. This is effects many students, but it especially
hurts Education majors since right now the Macintosh is the platform of
choice for educators at the elementary level. I've heard the Macintosh
lab is going to be updated and that this is why they haven't been repairing
it. This makes sense--not wasting resources on already out-dated machines
that won't be around much longer--but in the meantime students have to
deal with a lab that is slow, crashes often, and where several machines
don't have functioning disk drives.
On the up-side, the library has made great leaps in updating it's technology
and its new internet workstations are terrific. The fact that they are
specialized, with only selected information and internet search tools
available, means that students don't have to compete with people doing
email or writing papers. Having instructions for using the software is
easily and readily available makes it easy for novice users to use the
workstations. This update of technology in the library was an effective
use of funds, and I like the way that it demonstrates internet resources
like the WWW are legitimate research tools and not just high tech toys.
|