Read Message | Help |
Back to Inbox | |
Prev | Next Download Attachments |
|
Dear
K.,
Thank you for your late night words (I love the full moon element, your words have that haunting "suchness" to them from the "whether one bowls of water or a hundred reflect, the moon still shines"...) I've committed myself to precinct walking on Saturday for my attorney Pat's brother Terence "Kayo" Hallinan, the S.F. D.A. (he's actually a very progressive guy, their dad was Vincent the waterfront/labor activist, their mom Vivian a prominent "limousine liberal," I suppose--a wealthy and dedicated socialist/socialite. I have to be in The City around 10:30 to start, but I can be back in Berkeley late afternoon, say 4:30 or so. Yes I suppose teaching these days can be a wee bit of a challenge. I tutored at Cal about a decade ago, in a special program starting up then for student/athletes; I was hired for the "creative writers" and upper-division Economics/English majors, through a buddy with whom I played hoop (almost religiously, I might add, the same group of players at "center court" for over twenty years--myself until recently considered one of the "newcomers"...). I expected lunkheads but was pleasantly surprised (most of my students turned out to be female--tennis, swimming--and hard-working). Twas there that I met Ms. Sherri Halgren, a fellow tutor who's gone on to become head of the Creative Writng Program at St. Mary's College (where Brenda Hillman, her good friend, teaches) and a regular book reviewer for the S.F. Chron. (She also is a co-director of the Napa Valley Writers Conference, from which I got a "Fiction Workshop" scholarship one year, 1990, I believe--and, no, I didn't sleep with her to obtain, my short stories each most certainly stood on feet of one's own...) As many of my puzzled students then were having difficulties with Mrs. Maxine Hong Kingston's "Woman Warrior," too, they were referred to me (as my buddy knew that I was very much a practicing Buddhist), and, yes, I have another story about myself and Maxine as a result (another missive, too much today already!). Found this kind of old one related to teaching for you: OCTOBER BLUES Strange
how each time
Swirls
of fall colors,
Shrug
of coat around,
colder
now, yet another summer
for
the first time in years...
ever
quite enough.
the
time has come for myself to leave…
Thomas
Francis Noonan 10/7/97
What I've been reading lately (a bit ruefully, given the elegance of the language): Sonnet CVIINot mine own fears, nor the prophetic soul[something I posted on the MIT Internet Shakespeare Discussion page last year--keeping my chops in shape, so to speak]: This sonnet appears early in the sequence; to me a big clue is contained in the previous sonnet (22) and seemly raiment. Our man Shakespeare is bemoaning his "disadvantaged" position, in that his "lowly" state of being—in comparison with the finery-clad dandies that he calls "prancing jacks" elsewhere (and too the Rival Poet's, Marlowe a.k.a. "Dr. Faustus," and Ben Jonson, a.ka. "Volpone Himself")—is "putting [him] besides his part," as in an actor, who, knowing all too well that he is merely "acting," becomes all too "imperfect" for the stage. Modern usage is "stagefright," but the complexity of the matter is well-put here. Too, as one forced to endure humiliation knows all too well, assuming a "fierce" countenance can make one seem a "thing" (or monster) "replete with too much rage." Continuing the acting analogy, one failing to deeply understand the "kingly" motivation of say, a Prince Hal (Henry V) might play the part too much of a bezerker ( a Nordic/Slavic warrior from the Middle Ages known for leveling a land with slaughter without any "second thoughts"); "Whose strength's abundance weakens his own heart" thus becoming clear in meaning—the wisdom is from the more ancient concept of "warrior" (in particular out of Vedic India and subsequent Eastern traditions) in which one flaws one's strategy with a heart too hardened to permit the tender notion of mercy . This process, especially, being the role a woman plays in bringing about the influx of the feminine as a warrior's redemption… And yet, knowing how all important this matter is—as a man to a woman—if the bond of "trust" is not present, the man, from "fear" of being rejected as umworthy, may not "get all the words right," so to speak: in his mind's eye seeing some "perfect ceremony of love's rite," again, based on ancient and medieval courtier rituals of love (think back to the Krishna, in particular, for our wellsprings of "love's rite," the double entendre of "right" with the meaning of being "right" for a woman's choice of love as opposed to force of "right" as some propertied privilege most powerfully present). Even when the words are merely I love you… The subtle grace and nobility of a soft-spoken Shakespeare—his "love's strength" of his "honey-tongued voice"—thus making him "seem to decay," i.e., by not being arrogantly bold (think the devilishly clever Richard III) his competition can make claim to be a sign of growing weakness… "O'ercharged with burden of mine own love's might," then, can be seen in the particularly Shakespearean way of his "having played kingly parts in sport" (as one well-known eulogy stated). Perhaps the meaning "encypher'd" here is that our man Will was what Thomas Jefferson was to term a natural aristocrat: one more "self-made" than merely born. As such Sweet Will was what we now would call an "alpha male," despite his disfavor with Elizabeth and the dandies of the Court: think of the wily old weasel "Justice" Burghley, her "legal advisor," and the way that anyone could be made subject to Elizabeth's edicts; in particular was her predilection for posing as a "kingly spiritual initiator," one, ironically enough, in the exact same Gaelic mode of being "married to the land as sovereignty" of the Irish she was attempting to exterminate. Thus the origin of her "matchmaker's cult," in which ,by hocus-pocus pronouncements, those in her disfavor were fiat declared as having to be gay or gone; the Elizabethans, and the James' to follow, deployed an arcane system of sorcery to hold not just the subjects but too the "inner circle" in check in which your fate after death ("the undiscovered country" the thoughts of which "must give one pause") was allegedly determined by these all too human rulers as Elizabeth and James… So, despite "mine own love's might," our man Shakespeare finds himself in a position of being unable, that is, his love here addressed is most likely a Lady of "standing" with the Court (mine own pet theory is the Countess Mary of Pembroke), thus his "burden"…Some "wall" of Elizabeth's making, which, when put into combinations of four and assigned human mobility, quite effective in ensuring this "upstart crow's" most mournful isolation… For solace he turns to books and seeks tales of past unrequited love. Finding the "eloquence" there through accounts of others presagefully struck "dumb" by the "might" of "love"… His "tongue" having already yattered too much away (perhaps an ancient Biblical allusion, as well, of "speaking in tongues" as the Tower of Babel meant, i.e., all these different "dialects" and "profusions" and still no understanding at all "express'd"), our man Will, humbled by the accounts of the others "Who plead for love and look for recompense," feels his "speaking breast," the finely spiritual way (think Moses having "hidden the blessings of Heaven in my breast") of love, in which one "silent" look from a Krishna, to a woman wishing to be his "consort," when properly "read," speaks volumes; in the same Vedic wisdom way training one's "eyes" to "hear" a divine path (known as "Bhakti Yoga," subtle devotion to one's beloved) "to love's fine wit"…[end posting] Gotta run and get a plane ticket to see HHDL in Burbank next month; I'm not working tonight (I'm a bit miffed about not being invited to the cast party Weds. night--my "network" has been dropping all kinds of "hints like anvils at this point" about the fact that I'm dying to "get back on my feet again" with the upcoming Irish play, Beauty Queen--I even told Terry, the subscription manger, who did get to attend, even though he has little use for the theatre, about the concept "roar of the greasepaint," a well-known phrase that, as I explicated, means that one knows one's play "has legs of its own" and is going to be a success when the actors begin to "hear" the roar of the greasepaint, i.e., when every time that the stage makeup goes on, some deep, profoundly "transcendental" silence descends (as in meditation) and each is magically transported to some place far away, long ago, as the sound of an audience's enthusiastic applause after a successful performance (with any luck in the actor's memory) becomes the faint roar of the sea, breaking on some moonlit beach... Let me know
what you want to do, I'll check my voicemail (510-549-8828#540) later (plus
the Aurora is now doing "The Glass Menagerie"...)
tom noonan ********** Date:
MILL VALLEY AUTUMN Here the leaves
don't turn
Good day for
now. Maybe I'll see you in Berkeley
Truly,
*********
We dream from the graves too. . . what an idea! I'm
|
Prev | Next Download Attachments | ||
Back to Inbox |