|
![]() |
CAT Tracks for August 8, 2007
IL BUDGET CRISIS |
From the STLtoday.com website...
Illinois schools are left hanging during budget crisis
By Kevin McDermott
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Even as school districts around Illinois prepare for the
delay of millions of dollars in scheduled state aid this week because of the
state's budget crisis, a pending law that could ease their plight sits unsigned
on the desk of Gov. Rod Blagojevich.
State lawmakers and school district officials expressed frustration Tuesday
that Blagojevich had yet to sign into law House Bill 357, which would allow
school districts to more easily move money among various funds within their
budgets.
The bill is a routine three-year extension of a legal authority that expired
for the districts on June 30. It was sent to Blagojevich almost two months ago
without a single "no" vote in the Legislature. It gives districts more leeway
in moving money around among their different budgetary funds — such as
transportation, maintenance and education — to shift the money to where it's
most needed.
"Right now, we're not even sure if we have the authority to do that," said
David Elson, superintendent of Alton School District 11.
The district is preparing for the delay of some $623,000 that it is supposed to
get from the state by Monday.
State Rep. Roger Eddy, R-Hutsonville, a co-sponsor of the fund transfer bill,
said it was designed to address situations such as this one, in which school
districts need to juggle their finances to deal with unexpected funding losses
or delays.
"It gives school districts flexibility," he said. "In the current situation,
flexibility from day to day is crucial."
Rep. Jim Watson, R-Jacksonville, another of the many co-sponsors of the bill
from both parties, said Blagojevich's lack of action on it illustrated a wider
frustration with his governing style.
"He hasn't signed much of anything, unless it's high-profile," said Watson.
In fact, delays in taking action on bills have been the norm for Blagojevich
lately. Of more than 700 bills sent to him this year, he had acted on about 30
of them as of Tuesday, according to legislative records.
The administration didn't immediately return messages asking why the fund
transfer bill hadn't been acted upon.
If Blagojevich doesn't sign or veto the bill by Saturday, it automatically
becomes law, under a constitutional provision that requires the governor to act
on legislation within 60 days of receiving it.
But some school districts would have liked to have had that authority in the
past few weeks. More than 900 districts are shuffling their budgets to cover
the delay of $170 million that schools were supposed to get from the state
within the next few days but now probably won't because of the budgetary
impasse.
"It absolutely does make it easier" if districts can move money around among
funds when facing the delay of state checks, said Brent Clark, executive
director of the Illinois Association of School Administrators.
Clark said school officials statewide were experiencing anxiety about the state
budget showdown. Although virtually all districts affected by the funding
delays will be able continue operating after next week, the problem will only
get worse if the impasse continues, because school aid checks are scheduled in
bimonthly payments.
"We're doing our best to prepare for a worst-case scenario," said East St.
Louis District 189 Superintendent Theresa Saunders, whose district is supposed
to get about $2.5 million from the state twice a month, including a payment
late this week or early next week that is likely to be delayed by the
Springfield budget impasse.
Lee Triefenbach, the East St. Louis district's chief financial officer, said
the district's budgetary reserves could get it past a few missed payments,
assuming that money is repaid upfront by the state as soon as a budget
agreement is finally reached. Saunders predicted that would happen soon.
"I don't believe either party wants to incur the wrath of their communities" by
putting schools in jeopardy, said Saunders. "We're not panicked here. We're
concerned, but we expect things to turn around."
However, there was little indication of that on Tuesday in Springfield, where
the Legislature remains in session more than a month into the new fiscal year
without a budget.
Blagojevich is demanding major new spending on health care, education and
infrastructure. Legislative leaders say the state can't afford Blagojevich's
budgetary agenda. Neither side has budged.
State Comptroller Dan Hynes, whose office issues state checks, says the state
lacks legal authority to send out school aid, government employee pay or other
kinds of state government payments.
Blagojevich's office disputed that conclusion on Tuesday, saying the state
should be able to pay workers because the state still has money even if it
lacks a budget. However, an appellate court decision cited by the attorney
general's office specifies that state paychecks can't legally go out in the
absence of a budget.
POST-DISPATCH SPRINGFIELD BUREAU
From the chicagotribune.com website...
Governor gets off high horse, but is it too late?
Eric Zorn
Gov. Rod Blagojevich told a surprising tale earlier this week at a bill-signing ceremony.
He said he was jogging in Springfield recently when he passed a man who shouted, "'Hey, governor, you...' and I better not say the next word, but it rhymes with luck."
The surprise wasn't so much that the governor was in Springfield -- though that's unusual for him -- or that a stranger would have a low opinion of his recent performance in office.
The surprise was that Blagojevich told such a story on himself. It suggested a self-effacing nature, even humility, that the usually self-righteous chief executive has kept under wraps most of his political career.
To date, he has been all about the preen: His boast about his "testicular virility," his insistence that God himself endorses his health-care plan, his sanctimonious attacks on those whose priorities don't align with his own.
The Blagojevich of yore wouldn't have told the jogging story unless the punch line was, "Hey, governor, keep on fighting the good fight for the children and working families of Illinois!"
Now, it's true that you don't go from being a campaign aide to Ed Vrdolyak to being the governor of Illinois in just 15 years if you're excessively modest. And Blagojevich is hardly the only state and local pol who has a hard time concealing his enormous self-regard.
I doubt these current travails have turned him into a humble man, but his telling of a humbling tale suggests he may have realized at last that his air of aggrieved piety has become insufferable.
Having, or at least pretending to have, a sense of humor about the fact that people detest you freely is a step on the road toward being less detestable.
* * *
Among those exhibiting open contempt for Blagojevich these days is state Sen. Dan Cronin (R-Elmhurst), who on Monday introduced a resolution in Springfield to institute recall elections in Illinois.
Blagojevich blasted the move as "Republican partisan politics," though anger at him during this record-setting overtime legislative session crosses party lines. But, the governor added, "I think the concept and the idea of having people have the ability to recall their elected officials and put term limits on terms is a good idea."
Cronin's proposal would allow disgruntled citizens to circulate petitions for special elections on whether to oust unpopular elected officials before the expiration of their terms. Recall has populist cred, having been promoted for years by Lt. Gov. Patrick Quinn and other grass-roots types. It adds a layer of accountability to the performance of officeholders, an extra democratic check on deceivers, rogues and flip-floppers.
Yet Blagojevich is wrong. It's a bad idea.
Five reasons why:
1. Special elections are expensive. For example, California's special gubernatorial recall election of 2003 cost about $60 million, according to the Los Angeles Times.
2. Officeholders are already too poll-driven. One animating idea of representative democracy is that what's right in the long run isn't always what's popular in the moment. Jerking elected officials around on the short leash of a recall threat risks a form of mob rule.
3. Big-money interests gain power under a recall system. Well-funded petition drives would have little trouble putting officials on the recall hot seat (a little more than 400,000 valid signatures would be required to force Blagojevich into a recall election using Cronin's formula), meaning that special interests would hold just one more lever.
4. Regular general elections already give us a form of recall. Disgruntled Democrats had a chance to bounce Blagojevich in favor of Edwin Eisendrath in the primary last year but didn't. Voters in the general election could have elected Republican Judy Baar Topinka or Green Party candidate Rich Whitney but didn't. Another chance to send him packing comes in three short years.
5. For truly dire cases of misbehavior, there's always the impeachment option, already written into the state constitution.
This recall proposal will die a well-deserved death in committee. When it comes to Blagojevich, Illinoisans are another word that rhymes with luck: Stuck.