We have established that members must be present to vote in our elections; however, in order to eliminate proxies altogether, if we adopt RONR at the beginning of our meeting, does the ruling on page 421 actually eliminate proxies or do our state statutes "require" that we allow them? Obviously, state statutes overrule RONR, but what is your interpretation and do we have the power to eliminate proxies? - Chuck Wade, Nov. 24, 1999
A:
I'm concerned about your phrase "adopt RONR at the beginning of our meeting...".
Normally, the adoption of a parliamentary authority appears in an organization's bylaws or constitution.
It would be improper to adopt an authority for a meeting, since the authority specifies the rights of absent members (such as rules for proxy voting).
Only at the beginning of mass meetings or meetings of unorganized bodies are a parliamentary authority adopted.
See RONR p. 15.
Your organization, being over 150 years old (see Is member represented by proxy "present"?) is certainly organized.
If your constitution actually does specify RONR as the parliamentary authority, then, as you point out, proxy voting would be prohibited.
If it does not, then proxies are allowed.
You should amend your constitution to either adopt RONR (the preferable solution for many reasons) as your parliamentary authority, or to explicitly prohibit proxies.
Check the details of your constitution for the proper procedure for their amendment.