Here's a headline. Britney Spears Debuts in Yahoo Shop-Along. More like "I Wanna be a Slut and Dress like Britney!" Says here that she bought a T-shirt for $194.90. That's American dollars, folks. Call me an idiot, but anybody who would go out and buy that shirt just cuz Britney wears it, is an idiot. I mean, really, who is Britney's main fan base? Eight to fifteen year old girls? Yeah, they're gonna buy that stuff....

In other news, Martina Hingis sued her shoe company.

Isn't it fascinating the effect that big names have? Just because it's Martina Hingis, and her feet hurt, it makes yahoo news. Just because it's Britney and she's going shopping online, it makes yahoo news. Although that one might be because she was actually shopping at yahoo itself. They can't very well fail to cover a story involving themself. Which brings up another interesting point. Do you ever hear radio stations, or TV stations throwing in a plug for themselves? "The story of Martina Hingis's right foot hurting was broken by Yahoo News. Now Yahoo News has NEW breaking news. Martina's left foot is now hurting". Or something like that. You know? Probably not. I'm not being to clear I suspect. I'm practicing bad journalism. Is there such a thing as good journalism? I suspect that only free lance journalists can really be objective. And not even them, because they can't always publish what they want. Okay, I'll put you out of your misery and end this right here and now.

HELLLOOOO!!!!!