About "The Last Hours"

 

 

Question:-

I have been reading "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight" by Thom Hartmann which has become popular and has also been recommended by N.D. Walsch (whose book, "Conversations with God" I asked you to comment on .) This book also seems very sensible to me and also says pretty much the same thing as you say in your book and articles. Is this impression correct or are there some differences?

Answer:-

It seems to me that the following comments are appropriate:-

(1) The book "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight" describes the way this planet is being destroyed by the present Dominant Western Civilisation that commits crimes against humanity and causes increasing differences in wealth owing to continuous transfer of it from the majority to a small minority that controls all affairs in its delusional self-interest. Hartmann has correctly seen that there is a reciprocal relationship between man and his environment - that the condition of this planet earth which affects human life, itself depends on the behaviour of human beings and their societies and that depends on the thoughts and ideas that govern them; and that these ideas depend on their state of being. But he does not appear to have noticed that their level of development depends on factors that drive human evolution. Nevertheless, it is very good book that has brought together some of the very serious environmental, social and ideological problems that the world is facing today and also presents some solutions. It is a book that should be widely read and newer information from modern research should be added. The developments brought about by Western Civilisation is certainly causing the world to head straight for a major global disaster, which the newly emerging Powers such as China and India are adding to by their imitation.

 

(2) Hartmann correctly notes that humanity is in the grip of a web of misinformation, illusions, delusions and superstitions of all kinds created by the self-interests, mainly of those who have the power and control, and his book does much to penetrate the fog. The problem, however, is that the majority of people are only interested in trivialities and fantasies that render them psychologically and politically too impotent to make any difference. It seems that the power groups that control all affairs including industry, government and information wants things to remain so and actively encourage it in the power group's own interest because it makes people much more controllable and exploitable. But it is the members of the power group themselves who have become victims of this process and see it as normal. Humanity is in a vicious circle, a trap from which there is no escape, except through an awakening that requires its own special techniques.

 

(3) As Hartmann points out, people are "disconnected" from each other and from nature - In the terminology I used they are "alienated" from Reality, and therefore from each other, from Nature and from themselves and from God. It is evident from a study of the contemporary state of man that far from the claims to civilisation, freedom and even Democracy made by the so called "advanced" nations, they are still barbaric and that they are trapped in fantasies, illusions and superstitions though of a different kind from the past. They do not, in fact have freedom but are slaves to ignorance and self-indulgence and far from the self-determination that Democracy implies affairs are manipulated by a small group of those who hold the wealth, power and prestige, who are themselves enslaved. It is the System that controls people and not the other way round.

 

(4) Though somewhat simplistically described, Hartmann has noted that there are two ways of life:- The Ancient Tribal System where people saw themselves as part of nature and lived in self-sustaining environments, in small tribes that were stable and organised in an egalitarian and cooperative manner. This system was disrupted with the development of City States, a new Dominating System, where self-centred egotism sought power and control over all things including nature and other human beings, leading to the creation of hierarchies, mutual exploitation, group conflicts and great inequalities. It also led to expansionism that has plundered, vandalised and disrupted the environment. This is also associated with male dominance over all affairs, including women, animals and property. He points out that the teachings of Jesus were in conformity with the life style of these ancient people and incomprehensible for these Domineering cultures and that is why his followers were persecuted and then transformed and assimilated. The Church undertook the same domineering policies as history, particularly of the invasion of the Americas by Europeans shows. He notes that the idea that the so called "civilised" people are superior to the "primitive" people and that "progress" has been made is an illusion. He also points out that changes in nature are not a continuous ascent but that there are cycles of progress and degeneration.

All this is true. It is, however, necessary to point out that from the religious point of view, at least the Islamic one, the aim of existence is the expansion of consciousness (to know God), though the cycles of "awakening" and "sleep" are also recognised. Knowledge has certainly expanded, though much of the awareness that people closer to nature had, has also been lost. The two ways of life constitute a pair of opposites that appear to reflect also the two sides of the human brain. There has to be a third stage yet to come where this pair of opposites is reunited and transcended (51:49-50).

In this connection it is to be noted that the Islamic notion of Vicegerency and Stewardship rather than ownership has elements of both and neither system. Man as a conscious spiritual being is seen neither as part of Nature (though he is so physically) nor as someone that dominates, enslaves and exploits, but someone who as an agent of God (11:7, 18:7, 51:56, 67:2), has responsibilities for the welfare of the world and all things in it. He can be replaced if he does not fulfil his responsibilities (70:41, 14:19, 11:57). It is true that the Quran appears to support human dominance in verses such as 2:164 and 14:32, but that is a misinterpretation as it also tells us about natural laws and processes that cannot be dominated. Another interpretation is that all these processes were made for man that he could arise. But the correct interpretation is that these can be used to benefit us and that they provide lessons from which we can learn - they are "signs for people who can understand". Note that the coming of this Domineering Way of Life was already mentioned in the Quran as follows:-

"And when your Lord said unto the angels: I am about to place a Vicegerent (Agent, Successor, Inheritor) in the earth, they said: Will you place therein one who will do evil therein and shed blood, while we celebrate Thy praise and glorify Thee? Said (the Lord): I know what you know not." 2:30

As this refers to all human beings, the relationship between them is to be based on personal responsibility and "mutual consultation" (42:36-43) not coercion.

In the Domineering system a person is assessed as a slave or employee as having a value to the employer when the value of his output for the employer exceeds the value of what he consumes i.e. the wages he is paid by the employer. This surplus is the profit that the employer seeks to increase. In an Objective system where all human beings are seen as similar and related and forming a single system, each individual can be regarded as having a value equal to the difference between the value of what he consumes and produces for the development of the world, including the community and himself. This idea should become a Fundamental Controlling Principles (FCP).

 

(5) Though Hartmann has identified some of the psychological problems, it seems that he has failed to notice that it is the entry of women into the industrial and commercial sphere and the consequent break down of the family and the psychologically adequate bringing up of the new generation which is both the result and the cause of much of the greed, lust and self-centredness that has produced the world problems. It can hardly be denied that the relationship between the sexes and between parents and children have a most important influence on the psychology and behaviour of human beings.

Human motivation is controlled by three sets of drives - the self-preservative, the socio-sexual and the self-extensive. These normally emerge in turn as the previous one reaches satisfaction. It is arrested development, the fixation on the self-preservative that causes selfishness and greed. This also harnesses the sexual drive to form the pleasure principle leading to self-indulgence and the self-extensive drive becomes the desire for power. But in a healthy state, it is sexuality that joins the sexes and through reproduction where the two are blended in a harmonious manner, creates the society and that is a network of families bound by genetic links. It is this drive that harnesses the self-preservative as well as the self-extensive drives - it causes the feeling of self to expand and cover spouse and children and through them to other relatives. Being creative, it also through sublimation provides the creativity that is responsible for culture, the expansion of civilisation and human development. But there is no real understanding of the different natures and roles of men and women in the present dominant culture, and women are still oppressed but in a different way than formerly - They are either sex object or required to give up their femininity and behave like men and compete with them. Indeed, even men are suppressed in many ways, their rights eroded and required to apologise for their testerone. Both sexes have become largely irresponsible and frustrated because they cannot complement each other or obtain what they need from each other. Lest all this misunderstood as usually the case when a sensitive topic is touched on , this is not to say that women should be subordinated or suppressed as in the past - all have the right to self-fulfilment. But that their particular characteristics should be allowed full expression in order to maximise benefits to society. Value in religion is judged not by physical or mental power but by spiritual function, though the others may aid this. Though membership of a family and the married state occupies most of life, there is no education for it at all. In fact the educational system everywhere totally fails to educate people about how to live an intelligent life outwardly or inwardly.

 

(6) There is also an answer in my articles to the problems posed by Hartmann's book. The gist of this as follows:-

Humanity is living on the energy of the sun, not only on that which is radiated onto the earth now, but also stored on earth over millions of years in the form of coal and oil that were once absorbed by plants and animals. This store is gradually running out and at an accelerating speed. We will then have to live only on the solar energy that is falling on earth now. This will either cause much starvation and death - animals are already going extinct - or it will be a stimulus to the development of alternative technologies or to space exploration and possible migration. The earth not only receives solar and other forms of energy from the rest of the cosmos, but it also radiates some it back directly R(d), absorbs and transforms R(t) some and re-radiates it R(r). It is only the balance between what is received and what is radiated that is available for the development of the earth itself. However, this can be stored as reserves or "obstructing fat", or the development can be positive or negative, constructive or destructive, and it may or may not be beneficial for man. Global warming and the resulting unpredictability of the weather that is causing much global distress is a result of such surplus energy. It is perfectly possible to improve the proportion of what is absorbed, radiated and re-radiated by more efficient means of absorption and transformation and also to utilise that energy in much more efficient ways. This is not yet fully realised.

Evolution is about increasing order or negentropy resulting from the absorption of solar and other cosmic radiations. Given a certain amount of order, it is possible for it to be distributed in several different ways:- (i) To produce technology (ii) To create order in the environment. (iii) To create social and political order of various kinds. (iv) To expand the bio-mass (v) To expand the population of higher animals (vi) To cause human evolution. It is not difficult to see that an increase in order in one of these can produce disorder in the others. Anti-social behaviour, riots and political conflicts can be results of oppressive order in the environment. Psychological development can be gained by sacrificing industrial production. In fact, whenever resources are used to manufacture order, this has to be paid for by disorder - e.g. waste and pollution. This accumulates unless processed in reverse. Problems are caused when the rate of recovery, as in most cases, is slower than the rate of wastage.

 

(7) Hartmann notes that one of the characteristics of the Domineering Civilisation as part of the desire to subjugate and control, is the tendency to centralise, assimilate, standardise, remove diversity and create uniformity, which also leads to intolerance.

All this is true. We can see this continuing to happen as the pressure exerted by economic and political forces bring cultural uniformity to the world as globalisation proceeds or a clashe of civilisations takes place. This process, of course creates rule bound and inflexible organisations and conflict between them. This narrows down the range of possibilities and militates against adaptation and evolution which require diversity so that what is best fitted to changing conditions will thrive. Here again, we find that Islam has a solution in that it recognises all religions and is able to accommodate all cultures and did so. It is only the attack by other systems that has led to the need to retaliate against them.

 

(8) Hartmann thinks that a solution to the world problems is the equalisation of wealth. He suggests that the highest income should be no more than about 10 to 20 times the lowest income. This does not, however, get rid of the domination of the few over the many. Attempts have been made at a fairer distribution of wealth but have failed. This is because the Economic system that has been set up does not allow it. It depends wholly on profit, the extraction of more than is put in, without which it would simply come to a halt.

It is true that the great differences of wealth create social division, alienation and conflicts, but also two other kinds malfunctions those of deprivation and those of over-indulgence. The poor are debilitated and deprived of the means to health, education and organisation as well as of a sense of self-value and hope. The rich, apart from suffering the organic and psychosomatic diseases caused by an unnatural way of life, have to construct psychological barriers against others in order to suppress natural sympathy and empathy and by rationalisations that damage objective perception, thought, motivation and action. 

The Islamic solution is the Zakat (Obligatory Charity), Spending rather than hoarding, and the abolition of interest and also the replacement of the employer-employee relationship with partnerships, and the requirement that there should be no unnecessary waste of resources or disruption of the ecological system. There is a big difference between a system that values giving above receiving or taking and a system which values the reverse. One of the major causes of the difference of wealth and many other evils is the existence of National Barriers. The removal of these would allow the migration of people from areas poor in resources to richer areas as in the past. The Islamic system is not based on territory but on the community and common ideology.

 

(9) Hartmann notes that :- (i) apart from the sources of energy, coal and oil being used for energy, they are also used (ii) to produce such things as plastics and even the machinery that is to use renewable sources as wind, waves and sun. (iii) That resources are used to manufacture arms and ammunition which have only a destructive use so that destroyed things have to be replaced. (iv) As technology makes more resources available the population increases, thereby putting more pressure on the environment. (v) As more resources are used more pollution is created which has to be counteracted and (vi) it becomes more and more difficult to extract and refine resources. Hartmann, however, appears to have ignored Nuclear Fuel. This, of course, also depends on resources that are exhaustible and the there is (vii) a mounting problem of the disposal of the radio-active waste and other waste

The fact is that there are further problems:- (viii) Not only is the population increasing but demand per person is also increasing. (ix) A great proportion of the resources are used to produce no benefit whatever but may also cause harm. (x) If the way of life designed to extract and use resources causes harm directly or indirectly then resources have to be used to counteract or undo the harm e.g. hospitals, medicines and medical equipment, nurses, social workers etc. have to be employed. (xi) If the harm is not undone, the malfunctions themselves cause waste of resources. For instance, greed and selfishness that may result from the feeling of insecurity will need to be fed with the hoarding of resources. This insecurity may itself result from the recognition of the greed and selfishness of others. (xii) This greed and fear leads to aggression, non-co-operation, and the construction of security systems, locks, fences, guards, police, courts, numerous rules for accounting and also the arms race. All this absorbs vast proportions of the resources.

In general, the economic system is so set up that the real cost of manufacture is not reflected in the price of goods owing to the fact that the State finances much through taxes and other corporations such as those providing water and waste disposal services. The diseases caused by the industrial system are treated by the medical and social services and their costs are not paid for by the industries. Centralisation of factories means that raw materials, goods and workers have to use cars, trucks and railways to move backwards and forwards from and to factories. These modes of transport and the roads and railways use resources but they are made necessary only by this centralisation. To an extent they make themselves necessary - the manufacture and distribution of means of transport make the means of transport necessary.

 

(10) The solution, Hartmann thinks, to the problems of the world is to apply a new science of living. He notes that this is already contained in the teachings of the religions though not understood or applied. Some of the solutions he offers are the rediscovery of these techniques; the propagation of "New Stories"; reconnection with nature and ourselves; learning to create awareness; re-empowering women which will also encourage population control and better upbringing of children; the removal of greed for more than what is necessary and beneficial; respect for other cultures and communities; renouncing war against all living things; changes in technologies and how they are used; removal of addictions to TV and other sources of illusions; creating Intentional Communities; and recreating our daily lives and rituals. All this and more has been mentioned in "The Alternative Way" and my other articles. It is not difficult to see that what Hartmann is recommending is a complete new Way of Life, a Religion in fact. But it cannot be implemented without faith and requires a comprehensive educational system that includes all aspects of life and the whole of culture. Such a teaching already exists in Islam, though not implemented. It is true, of course that the Quran and Hadith had to cater for the conditions of life that existed in the past. Nevertheless, there is something in them that also looks forward to the future. But neither of these can be judged by means of present day prejudices particularly those that derive from the Western system.

 

(11) Hartmann points to the power of thought to bring changes. He speaks of certain basic attitudes created by what he calls "stories". But they could be seen as Myths, Values, Memes or Psychons and are really normally subconscious assumptions underlying the Way of Life. They could be called "Fundamental Controlling Principles" (FCP). There was a change, for instance, from regarding the ownership of slaves as perfectly normal to seeing it as evil. There is a culture of admiration for "the fighting spirit", of war and military power, and we have expressions such as "war against poverty and disease" etc. An assumption that controls people in the "Developed" world, propagated by Commercial interests, and which creates the consumer society, is the idea that the greater the number of possessions the happier a person will be. It is supposed that people are "rich" when they have material wealth most of which is useless but controls their life, brings tension, anxiety, insecurity, conflict and physical, mental and spiritual disease and unhappiness. But in reality what is unconsciously sought and beneficial to man is that which leads to self-fulfilment. This myth needs to be changed.

In fact, what is needed is a change in consciousness, of seeing the consistency of things in a wider context. As Hartmann says, and philosophers and others have noted, this consciousness is accompanied by a vivid awareness of ones "presence" in the "now". It is an Awakening. Usually when thinking begins, consciousness stops, and vice versa. But a new consciousness brings new thoughts. The spread of Christianity and Islam were due to a change of consciousness first and then they stimulated thought which then fossilised as habits. So he recommends meditation. It is true that People normally live is a state of sleep, of sub-consciousness, unaware of themselves or their surroundings and that is why things go on uncontrolled mechanically downwards. The Quran too asks us to Awake (34:46, 5:52, 79:13-14). It is said that we shall awake when we die being released from mental bondage to the body. But it can interpreted more widely as being "dead" to the worldly life. The Quran recommends the practice of "Remembering" (Zikr). This should revive the dead (6:123, 8:24).

 

(12) Hartmann, as many other people who keep themselves informed about the results of scientific research, have noted that the fundamental units of which things are made are not particles but waves. They represent probabilities. These waves only collapse into a particle and actualities when observed. It is the focusing of attention that causes what we call reality to arise. These units are not wholly separate from one another. Some are so "entangled" that changes in one instantly cause changes in the others without considerations of space or time. There is obviously a non-physical communication between things that has also been observed in organic life forms. He presumes, therefore, that "The universe is made of Consciousness...and nothing else."

This view is close to the Islamic view. Fundamentally, there is a field of probabilities which is similar to what in Religion is called Spirit and which is connected with consciousness. However, it is not all there is. There is also an ordering principle called "The Word of God" in religious terms, also defined as Truth (6:74) by which all things in heaven and earth are created (15:85). The contents of the Universe could be regarded as the Thoughts of God by which all things are defined (15:85).

We can form an Explanatory Hypothesis about what Reality is probably like as follows:- There is Universal Consciousness of which we and all other things are a part, and our consciousness is a small part of that. We can define the Spirit, Universal Consciousness as the Mind of God that contains His thoughts in accordance with the Quran (6:18, 104, 34:1, 8:47, 41:54, 65:12 etc.) It is the interaction between Universal Consciousness and Personal Consciousness that produces our Personal Reality. This is, however, only a small part of Universal Reality, that which is in the Mind of God. But that is a creation and a part of Absolute Reality (Quran 2:267, 4:131, 27:40, 38:65, 39:4 etc.). Human evolution consists of expansion of consciousness until it coincides with Universal Consciousness and that fulfils the Hadith Qudsi "Allah said: I wished to be known therefore I created the World." As the Spirit of God is within us (32:9), this is also achieved by knowing oneself. This is best known by interaction with one's fellow human beings and the world created by God. Note, however, that the soul (nafs) which arises from the Spirit (ruh) is specific to an individual, knowing one's soul is to know one's particular function, "Who one is". But through it, one comes to know the Spirit and through that one comes to know God.

This view requires the admission that there is an objective Reality to which we must conform or "surrender". It is not compatible with the view that man is god, the creator of Reality as some people assert, unless, of course, Reality is identified with subjective Personal Reality. But the definition of Reality given in the Quran is:

"That is because Allah, He is Reality, and that whereon they call instead of Him is the False, and because Allah, He is the High, the Great. See you not how Allah sends down water from the sky, and on the morrow the earth is green? Verily, Allah is Subtile, Aware. Unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and that is in the earth; verily, Allah is the Absolute, the Owner of all Praise." 22:62-64

There is a Collective Soul from which all individual souls derive (4:1). On the death of the individual the soul is recycled. The experiences, thoughts and desires etc. of the individual return into the Collective Soul and when an individual is created then it receives a portion from the collective soul. Each person can, therefore, be seen as contributing something constructive or destructive, good or evil, to the Collective Soul. Human evolution or involution is the result of this. It is thought that there is also some kind of structure and association between different parts of the Collective soul and interaction or exchange between ascending and descending souls.

----------<O>----------

Contents

 

 

1