10
Misconceptions about Taekwondo
Clearing
up the confusion Regarding TKD
by
J. Michael Plott
Just
10 years ago, the term tae kwon do was so unknown that South Korean
masters would call their martial art "Korean karate." Today,
however, most martial artists (as well as the general public) have
heard of tae kwon do and recognize it as both a sport and a system of
self-defense.
Despite
its new popularity, tae kwon do is still misunderstood in many
circles. Martial artists, in particular, seem to have vast
misconceptions about the style. There are two primary reasons for
this. First, some people are confused by the fact that within tae kwon
do there exist substyles, just as there are different systems of
karate. Tae kwon do was created jointly by masters of different Korean
styles, and while it is theoretically a unified system, the training
will vary somewhat according to each instructor's background. The
second-and primary-reason there are misunderstandings about tae kwon
do has to do with the South Korean
ranking
|
system. While most Americans tend to think a black belt is the
ultimate rank attainable in the martial arts, that is not true for tae
kwon do. A first-degree black belt in TKD signifies that the holder of
such rank is accomplished enough in the basics to begin serious
training. Even second- and third-degree black belts signify only
levels of skill in advanced training, not mastery of tae kwon do. In
South Korea, you must possess a fourth-degree black belt to be
considered an instructor, and you must have a fifth-degree black belt
to be considered a master instructor. Although a first-, second- or
third-degree black belt may be well-qualified to teach students of
lower rank, that same instructor is not to be considered an expert who
knows all there is to know about tae kwon do.
Most of the information about tae kwon do comes from people who have
studied the style. Unfortunately, most of the people who study TKD do
not achieve the rank of black belt. Consequently, most of the information about the style comes from individuals who have not even
received sufficient basic training, much less advanced teachings. If
your perceptions of tae kwon do have developed from contact with TKD
practitioners under the rank of fourth-degree black belt, it is quite
possible that you have developed some misconceptions about tae kwon
do. Following are 10 of the most common misinterpretations about tae
kwon do.
|
Many
people believe tae kwon do is simply a sport and not a valid
self-defense art, but noted instructor Jhoon Rhee demonstrates
the style's effectiveness against a would-be assailant's grab.
|
1
Tae kwon do is an ancient Korean martial art. This is not exactly
true. Tae kwon do is actually less than 50 years old. There is
evidence to suggest that martial arts existed in Korea 2,000 years
ago, but TKD is a blend of several of these systems, and it didn't
evolve until just after World War II.
Because
Korea was occupied by Japanese troops for approximately 40 years prior
to 1945, some people make the assumption that Korean martial arts are
influenced by Japan and are therefore not truly Korean, but instead
mere imitations of Japanese combat systems. While there may indeed be
some Japanese influence in Korean martial arts, to conclude that tae
kwon do is a "pirated" system ignores the fact that, in
centuries past, Korea conquered and occupied many parts of Japan. It
could therefore be argued that Ko- rean styles first influenced the
Japanese martial arts. Suffice it to say that tae kwon do is a Korean
martial art developed within the past 50 years, with roots in the
native Korean styles practiced more than 2,000 years ago.
|
There
are those who believe that the choreographed fighting forms of
tae kwon do have no real self-defense value because they are
simple and are forever changing.
|
2
Tae kwon do is a martial "sport," not a martial
"art." Tae kwon do is actually both a martial art and a
national sport derived from the martial art. Because the term
"tae kwon do" is used to describe both the sport and the
martial art, confusion is understandable. Do not, however, make the
mistake of assuming that tae kwon do is not a combat art. To the
contrary, it is a very complete self-defense system which includes
hand, elbow, foot and knee techniques, as well as pressure-point
strikes, groin and eye attacks, joint locks, throws and sweeps.
3
Tae kwon do stresses kicking, particularly high, flashy kicks that
have little self-defense value. It is true that tae kwon do emphasizes
kicks and that TKD practitioners are taught to use kicking techniques
whenever possible since they are more powerful than punches. But while
high, spinning, "flashy" kicks are part of the TKD arsenal,
they are not necessarily recommended for self-defense purposes. Quick,
strong kicks to targets below the midsection are, in fact, part of the
self-defense curriculum at most tae kwon do schools.
4
Tae kwon do has few hand techniques, and a TKD stylist is helpless
once you penetrate inside kicking range. Although training strategies
vary from school to school, most tae kwon do instructors spend a lot
of initial practice time on developing students' kicking skills.
Because people use their hands for many tasks and their legs primarily
just for walking, they generally have more hand coordination than foot
coordination. Tae kwon do training attempts to reverse that condition
by emphasizing the use of the legs, particularly in beginning and
intermediate students. Hand techniques are taught during the first
years of TKD training, but are downplayed in favor of kicking
techniques. Once a practitioner is skilled at defending and attacking
with primarily his legs, he is taught to integrate other techniques
(hand, elbow, etc.) with his highly developed kicking skills.
Much
of the misunderstanding about tae kwon do's close-range fighting
techniques comes from martial artists of other styles, who believe
that because TKD practitioners emphasize kicking, their hand techniques must be weak. This may be true of beginners, but not of
advanced tae kwon do stylists.
|
Some
people argue that tae kwon do is best suited for young,
athletically inclined individuals (above) because of the
style's emphasis on flashy kicking techniques.
|
5
All tae kwon do training is the same, regardless of the school. This
is no more true of tae kwon do than of any other martial art. The only
true similarity between all tae kwon do schools is that they teach a
Korean martial art that emphasizes kicking. Every other variable, from
the type of uniform worn to the way in which classes are conducted, is
determined according to the desires of the school's owner/instructor.
Dojang( tae kwon do schools) affiliated with larger organizations
oftentimes will even differ from other member schools.
6
Tae kwon do is the most/least effective martial art. All practitioners
like to think their style is the best, including tae kwon do stylists.
The fact is, however, that any martial art taught by a competent
instructor will greatly enrich your life, both mentally and
physically. In that sense, tae kwon do is no better or worse than any
other martial art
|
Although
some individuals claim that tae kwon do's high jumping and
spinning kicks have little self-defense value, there are
skilled practitioners who can deliver such kicks effectively
in a real fight.
|
7
Because of tae kwon do's emphasis on kicking, it is best suited for
young, athletically inclined individuals. This is not true. Although
TKD does emphasize kicking techniques (some of which are extremely
difficult to perform), it does not require that a practitioner be able
to execute each and every kick taught.
Practitioners
need only to have knowledge of each technique, not necessarily the
ability to flawlessly per- form each one. Tae kwon do recognizes and
rewards effort and inner spirit, not just physical ability. There are
many instances of people attaining black belt rank in TKD who are
aged, infirmed, or even physically handicapped. Tae kwon do, like most
martial arts, is for everyone, both the strong and weak, and the young
and old.
8
In the United States, tae kwon do is controlled by a small group of
Korean Americans. This is a matter of perception. Because it is a
relatively new style, there are a small number of quality instructors,
many of them of Korean descent. The fact that many TKD schools and
organizations are operated by South Korean-born instructors does not
reflect any conspiracy by those of South Korean ancestry to control
tae kwon do in the United States. Instead, it merely reflects the fact
that there are many more teachers of Korean descent in the U.S. than
there are those of American heritage. This is slowly changing,
however, as more quality American instructors emerge.
|
People
argue that tae kwon do is weak in the area of hand techniques,
leaving practitioners helpless once they penetrate inside
kicking range. Yet, TKD stylists are taught effective hand
techniques.
|
9
All tae kwon do associations claim to be the "official"
representative of TKD, making it difficult to determine which
organization one should join. There are a great many organizations
which claim to "officially" represent tae kwon do-some
local, some national, and some international in scope. The two largest
organizations are the International Taekwondo Federation (ITF) and the
World Taekwondo Federation (WTF). When the South Korean government
decided to establish a national martial art, the various TKD schools
were combined under the banner of the ITF, and General Hong Hi Choi
was named head of the organization. A few years later, Choi angered
South Koreans when he made an unauthorized trip to meet martial arts
leaders in North Korea. Both Choi and the ITF were subsequently
shunned by the South Korean government, and Dr. Un Yong Kim then
filled the resulting vacuum by creating the WTF. Under Kim's
leadership, the sport aspect of tae kwon do has been greatly
emphasized; it was a demonstration sport at both the 1988 end '92
Olympic Games.
Because
the ITF was created first and was discredited only for political
reasons' many people believe it is the "official" TKD
organization. However, because the WTF is the only organization
sanctioned by the South Korean government (and recognized by the
International Olympic Committee), many people feel it is the
"true" representative of TKD. There are also many smaller
tae kwon do organizations which are not affiliated with either the ITF
or the WTF. The bottom line is that it is possible to learn and
practice quality tae kwon do without joining any parent organization.
In general, joining a large organization means only that your
certificate of rank may be more widely recognized.
10
Because tae kwon do forms are recent creations, are simple to execute,
and are forever changing, they have no merit. While part of this
statement is true, the conclusion-that TKD forms have no value-is
absolutely false. It is true that tae kwon do forms are fairly new
creations, and that they have been revised occasionally. This does not
mean, however, that the forms are inferior and possess no merit. On
the contrary,
most modern tae kwon do forms are designed
|
People
argue that tae kwon do is weak in the area of hand techniques,
leaving practitioners helpless once they penetrate inside
kicking range. Yet, TKD stylists are taught effective hand
techniques.
|
to show
actual fighting
techniques. Although many of these moves are simple to execute, they
are effective self-defense maneuvers. Most experienced martial artists
agree that the most effective fighting techniques are those which are
the least complex. A form that shows an exotic defense against a
horse-mounted warrior wielding a double-headed spear may have been
practical at one time. but has extremely limited application in
today's world-which is, of course, why TKD forms are occasionally
modified. The forms of most martial arts, in fact, have been changed
or modified at one time or another to reflect the changing conditions
of the world.
***
These
are but 10 of literally dozens of misconceptions people have about tae
kwon do. And tae kwon do is not the only martial art that suffers from
widespread misinformation. All martial artists would be better off if
they refrained from passing judgment, good or bad, on any other styles
and simply accepted each as a brother in the ways of the warrior.
|
|