The Restaurant Business

Entry Barriers


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

The restaurant business is vast and varied from the sidewalk vendor or canteen truck to Chicago’s famous The Berghoff, a five star restaurant.  Even franchising is as varied from the typical quick service, McDonalds and Taco Bell, to the high-end establishments, Rain Forest Café and Planet Hollywood.  Before entering the restaurant business, one must determine the type of restaurant (meaning menu), and level of service (limited, semi, or full), then the decision between entering into a franchise agreement or developing a distinctive theme.   Not every potential restaurant entrepreneur wants to turn a single store into a multi-unit chain/franchisor operation, the goal may just be simply to survive, then thrive, and then pass on to the next generation.  Entry barriers for entering the restaurant business include conceptual, financial, local zoning laws and licensing, county and state laws and regulations, and federal laws and regulations.

      The conceptual barrier for most entrepreneurs is the hardest hurdle to overcome especially if they are going to develop their own distinctive theme.  To better understand the conceptual barrier one must just look at the restaurant business and see the signature foods.  Signature foods in the restaurant business are a competitive advantage between businesses operating at the same level.  Examples of signature foods include McDonalds Big Mac, Burger Kings Whopper, Taco Bells Chalupa, Hooters Hot wings, TGIFriday’s Jack Daniels Grille, and Chili’s Baby Back Ribs.  Along with the signature foods are signature themes including Steak-n-Shakes 1950’s diner, McDonalds Ronald McDonald and Friends, and Chi Chi’s Mexican cantina.  The conceptual barrier is a non-issue if the decision is to enter into a franchise agreement.  The conceptual barrier is a determinate of the type restaurant and level of service one is to offer.

      If you are going to compete with McDonalds, Burger King, etc. then your general concept will follow along the same lines; limited service, quick guest turnover, and low end pricing, average guest expenditure under seven dollars; with a signature food.  There are common concepts throughout the fast food industry based on the primary food sold, burgers/sandwiches (Burger King and Chic-Fil-A), fried chicken (Popeye’s and Kentucky Fried Chicken), Deli (Subway and Schlotzsky’s), Ethnic (Taco Bell and Sabarro), Bakery (Panera and Atlanta Bread Company), etc.; individual businesses within each niche have a recognizable theme.   No one would confuse a McDonalds for a Burger King.  Even as you move up the level of service ladder, going from limited service to full service, common themes still exist, the conceptual barrier resides more in the menu and developing recipes for the restaurant.  Common themes at the full service run the gambit from Bar and Grille (TGIFriday’s and Applebee’s) to Ethnic (Chi Chi’s and Olive Garden) to Fine Dining (“Five” star restaurants) to Family Style (Village Inn and Denny’s).  Competing at any service level requires a theme or concept distinctive, not always in the general theme, but different enough overall to attract new customers and create repeat customers. The theme includes the menu items, the interior appearance, the exterior appearance, the uniforms, the signage, etc.  According to Berlind, restaurants are the great melting pot by spawning the popularization of ethnic foods; Pizza Hut founder Frank Carney would only open a store where pizza was pronounced as “piz-a” (p.12). 

      Financing is the next hurdle the potential restaurant entrepreneur has to consider.  The straight out cost of opening a restaurant can range from around ten thousand dollars to several million dollars.  Financing and available funds often are the main determinant in the type of restaurant the potential restaurant entrepreneur is planning to open.  At this stage, the decision is still between franchising or developing something new.  In going the franchising route the cost are predetermined by the franchisor and can range from $100,000 (Larry’s Giant Subs and Blimpie) to over $1.5 million (Applebee’s and Panera’s).  Restaurants can be a capital-intensive business depending on the size, location, amount of specialized equipment (broilers, deep fryers, bread ovens, confection ovens, etc.), refrigeration and frozen storage, computerized equipment (POS terminals, cash registers, etc.), and fixtures (tables, chairs, etc.), etc.   It is understood the restaurant business is labor –intensive, someone to cook and someone to serve even if they are the same individual.  Other expenditures include new accounts with non-food, food and beverage suppliers, prepaying accounts usually is not necessary for franchised operations, and employer paid payroll expenses.

      The last group of barriers is the legal environment in which the business operates.  The legal environment at the local/county/state level includes liquor licensing, land use/zoning laws, fire codes, sanitation and disposal requirements, food service sanitation certification, smoke free establishments (currently only in California), “Happy” hour liquor sale laws, etc.  The legal environment at the federal level includes Equal Employment Opportunity Commission laws, American Disabilities Act compliance, Fair Labor practices, I-9 employment verification, and taxes. 

      Given the conceptual, financial, and legal barriers to entering the restaurant business it seems as on the surface franchising is the easier route but there are drawbacks.  Some drawbacks to franchising include exclusive regional/state/city contracts to limit intracompany (franchisor) competition, preselected or exclusive distributors, predetermined regional/national menu’s, pricing limitations, and maintenance of corporate standards.  The drawbacks make it sound as if the parent company, a.k.a. franchisor, is big brother looking into everyone’s business.  According to Silver (2002), the relationship between the franchisor and franchisee is at times hostile due to unprofitable discount campaigns and strong-arm tactics by corporate management (p. 48) but it does not have to be that way.  Several franchisor operations use a committee comprised of franchisees in idea generation and problem recognition/solution teams.  There are benefits to franchising as opposed to striking out new.  Benefits include regional/national advertising, name recognition, preconceived themes/menus, proven recipes, and proven operational techniques.

      In conclusion, barriers of entry into the restaurant business are conceptual, financial, and legal.   General themes or restaurant concepts unlike patented products are duplicated rather easily and often, and are dependant upon the level of service offered and type of restaurant.  Financial barriers are dependant upon the level of service offered and type of restaurant.  The legal barriers are not unique to the restaurant business but are still dependant upon the level of service offered and type of restaurant. The impact of the entry barriers is dependant upon the size, level of service, type (menu), and location of the restaurant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

Anonymous.  (July 30, 2001).   casual segment strong, wary of second half.  Nations Restaurant News v.35 no31.   p.46-48.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Berlind, J.  (January 15, 2002).  Yesterday and tomorrow.  Restaurants and Institutions v. 112 no 2.  p. 12, 14.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Berta, D.  (July 2, 2001).   Einstein buy puts Manhattan Bagel on top of the world.  Nations Restaurant News v.35 no 27.   p.1, 48.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Doss, L.  (April 15, 2002).  No monkeying around:  Larry’s Giant subs ready to rival sandwich shops.  Nation’s Restaurant news v. 36 no15.  p. 20.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

lagrassa, k. (March 2001).  entrpreneur of the year.  franchising world v.33 no2.  p. 8-9. Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

LaHue, P.  (october 2000).  atlanta bread co. on the rise.  restaurant hospitality v. 81 no10.  p. 132.   Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Myres, K.  (February/March 2002).  franchising 101: the most important decision you can make.  franchising world v. 34 no2.  p. 38, 40.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Mcgraw, K., Cobe, p., Bryant, k., Amer, s., & romeo, p.  (september 11, 2002).  extended runs.  restaurant business. retrieved september 11, 2002 from the world wide web:  http://restaurant…display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1644714

Ruggless, R.  (june 4, 2001).  schlotzsky’s “digital deli” traffic drives boost in web wired units.  nations restaurant news v. 35 no23.  p. 4, 65.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

Silver, D. (January 15, 2002).  Ties that bond.  Restaurants and Institutions v. 112 no2. p. 46-48,50,52.  Retrieved September 11, 2002 from Wilson Select Plus on line database (multidisciplinary publications)

 

1