Judging a Bardic Competition
- by Teleri the Well-Prepared
There are many ways to judge a bardic competition. Some of them are better than others, and nearly all have their time and place. The following is a very formal way to rate a set of performances. Its main advantage is that it provides examples for its ratings, so that (hopefully) a '5' means the same thing to one judge as to another. Its main drawback is that it requires a piece of paper per performer per judge, as well as extra time to tally all the scores.
Perfomer's Name:
Title of Performance Piece:
Type of Performance:
Technical Ability
How adept is the performer with his/her voice/instrument/gestures?
1 | No voice control/instrumental skill at all. |
2 | |
3 | There was some evidence of technique, but this piece needs a lot more practice. |
4 | |
5 | This piece was practiced; a few notes/words were out of sorts, but it was overall well done, and there was some style to it. |
6 | |
7 | Solid performance piece. I didn't hear any mistakes at all, and there was a good deal of style. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | Technically perfect! Every note/word in place, evidence of lots of practice and a well-developed style. I would consider taking lessons from this person. |
Emotional Projection
How well did the bard project some sort of emotion to the audience?
1 | There was no emotional projection in the piece
|
2 | |
3 | I realized the bard was trying to evoke an
emotional response, but the attempt failed
|
4 | |
5 | I chuckled/got a little misty/felt my pulse go up
a bit
|
6 | |
7 | I guffawed/sniffled/stomped my feet |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | I collapsed in laughter/burst into tears/sprang to
my feet and roared with my fist in the air
|
Audience Interest
How well did the performer hold your attention?
1 | I stopped listening after the first 30 seconds |
2 | |
3 | It wasn't painful to hear, but I'd rather have
been chatting with another judge instead
|
4 | |
5 | I listened politely and was fairly interested in
hearing the rest of the piece
|
6 | |
7 | I would shush my friends up to hear this performer
better
|
8 | |
9 | |
10 | I was utterly absorbed in the piece and would make
efforts to hear it again/get the words or tune.
|
Medieval Atmosphere
How well did the performer evoke the spirit of the Middle Ages and Reniassance, in your opinion?
1 | Not at all. The performer did something blatantly
and unredeemably modern.
|
2 | |
3 | Not very well. There were some really obvious
anachronisms in the piece that even a new person would
recognize.
|
4 | |
5 | Fairly well. Nothing was glaringly out-of-period,
as far as the average Scadian could tell. (Author's Note: I
realize 'Average Scadian' is vague.)
|
6 | |
7 | Really well. I felt like I was hearing something
that helped create a medieval atmosphere.
|
8 | |
9 | |
10 | Extraordinarily well. I could close my eyes and
envision myself listening to a performer of the
period.
|
Overall Impression
Did you like it?
1 | Not at all. |
2 | |
3 | It had its moments, but needs some serious
practice.
|
4 | |
5 | Yeah, that was pretty good. I'd probably like to
hear is again sometime.
|
6 | |
7 | Hey! That was really good! I'd like this
performer to do that at feast again.
|
8 | |
9 | |
10 | Wow! Does this performer have a CD or other
recording of their recitation/song/music? Can I buy
it to listen to over and over? |
Authenticity
Did the piece adhere to the authenticity requirements for this competition?
Yes | X points (Importance of authenticity to competition determines size of X) |
No | 0 points |
Time
Did the performer adhere to any time limits required for this competition?
Yes | 0 points |
No | -Y points (Importance of time requirement to competition determines the size of Y) |
If this doesn't suit your needs, you might try The Most Efficient and Informal Bardic Competition.
Return to the Bardic Resources Page.
|